Does CoH1 have a future?

Jump back to quoted post20 Jul 2015, 21:48 PMCieZ

Since when is being outside of the top 200 "almost top 100"?

15 games played in nowhere near enough time to properly calibrate your true ranking.

You played the strongest faction during a period of the community pretty much unanimously agreeing that Soviets are straight busted in 1v1s.

You got completely demolished by the only notable player you got matched up against.

You failed to beat anyone in the top 200, whilst playing Soviets... 1v1.

Meanwhile your normal account is rocking a sweet sub 50% win as USF 1v1.

/slowclap

But sure. You're really good and stuff. You're also still missing the entire point of this thread.

Jump back to quoted post20 Jul 2015, 21:58 PMCieZ

Somehow the quality of Nekron's posts have declined.

Didn't think it was possible. Not surprised though.

Jump back to quoted post20 Jul 2015, 23:17 PMnekron

inverse is a fucking rts pro gamer

Jump back to quoted post20 Jul 2015, 21:48 PMCieZ

Since when is being outside of the top 200 "almost top 100"?

15 games played in nowhere near enough time to properly calibrate your true ranking.

You played the strongest faction during a period of the community pretty much unanimously agreeing that Soviets are straight busted in 1v1s.

You got completely demolished by the only notable player you got matched up against.

You failed to beat anyone in the top 200, whilst playing Soviets... 1v1.

Meanwhile your normal account is rocking a sweet sub 50% win as USF 1v1.

/slowclap

But sure. You're really good and stuff. You're also still missing the entire point of this thread.

Jump back to quoted post20 Jul 2015, 22:37 PMd00z

I wasn't listing those as tactical, I was telling you the features that make CoH 2 the shittiest possible sequel to an incredible title that was CoH 1. And there is more to say on that, but it's useless. Game is unfixable.

Jump back to quoted post20 Jul 2015, 23:39 PMInverse

Nah, I was 135 after 15 games going 14-1 before losing a few games due to the reasons I mentioned in my post, both of which were easily winnable. And in those games the only possible improvements I could have made short of choosing a different build order were losing less units and picking different commanders. There was no further granularity beyond that, just two players throwing units at each other until one loses more than the other.

For someone who's apparently clueless about CoH2, I was expecting it to be more difficult.

Jump back to quoted post20 Jul 2015, 19:23 PMInverse

I almost got into the top 100 in a single day with zero strategic knowledge using standard commanders and a build from the beta, and that whole time the only important strategic decisions I made were commander selections. The rest was just micro and situational awareness. That shouldn't be possible in a strategy game.

Jump back to quoted post21 Jul 2015, 00:14 AMnekron

place 7 in 2v2 ranked it says nothing only abuse shit