Why is the IS2 accuracy so bad?

Jump back to quoted post17 Apr 2015, 21:49 PMAlexzandvar

It does do deflection damage, and yes the Tiger is better AI. Although I would say versus USF mostly since the IS2 is normally shooting at 4 men squads while the Tiger is shooting at 5 and 6 men squads.

The big weakness as you point out of the heavy's is they have low DPS, but the IS-2's 375 frontal armor and high speed means it can get in and out of sticky situations faster than a Tiger or KT can.

Jump back to quoted post17 Apr 2015, 21:49 PMAlexzandvar

It does do deflection damage, and yes the Tiger is better AI. Although I would say versus USF mostly since the IS2 is normally shooting at 4 men squads while the Tiger is shooting at 5 and 6 men squads.

The big weakness as you point out of the heavy's is they have low DPS, but the IS-2's 375 frontal armor and high speed means it can get in and out of sticky situations faster than a Tiger or KT can.

Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2015, 07:15 AMKatitof

It doesn't for well over a year.

Another bs gunned down.

And stop the bullshit about IS-2 being fast. Its not.
Sure, it is compared to JT or ele, but its not fast so stop spitting it out already.
Blitzing Tiger and KT are still faster then it and IS-2 having no defensive abilities that Tiger can have means it have MORE PROBLEMS getting out of bad situations then Tiger.

Jump back to quoted post20 Apr 2015, 07:36 AMdaspoulos

Well I surely wouldn't consider the is2 slow. Speaking from personal experience. The is2 has such good survivability partly due to its speed. Its the most maneuverable heavy tank in game. Tigers and king tigers may have blitz. But having passively higher speed and having the same or more armor is more effective than a short term speed boost.

While I'm not trying to imply that is2s need nerfs or germans need buffs. I'm merely saying speed definitely is an advantage for the is2. Quit trying to downplay it.