On Top CAS is fine.
![;) ;)](/images/Smileys/wink.gif)
Posts: 559
Posts: 611
Considering this doctrine only relies on infantry because of all the fuel getting coverted into munitions, it won't have any armor out unless the game lasts till the late game.
This gives you a lot of breathing space and you will only need to invest into AI.
Like, when I use it I often see these noobs build AT for no reason. And when I play against it I just spam AI, and if played right (meaning avoiding getting blobs caught by strafe runs), you will win because he will have to invest into AT, and you don't. Self-propelled howitzers and armored vechiles like the M8A1 Howitzer is very good counters to this doctrine, all you need to do is to make sure to avoid any AT strafes, which is easy. Whenever you see the recon plane, just move them.
Doctrine doesn't need nerf. You need the right units
Posts: 611
Posts: 1705
Posts: 1705
Posts: 959
You don't need this really.
CAS AT strafe will destroy any arty effortlessly, so while before you had to use 190 mun for it, now you need just 140 to make 600mp go bye bye.
Such balance, much relic.
Posts: 72
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently Bannedall skillplanes can be dodged. working as intended.
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently BannedPosts: 2779
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
So, u think arty should not be countered with this commander?
I haven't tested AT strafe against arty, but there's really not much difference, AT strafe is 110, and stuka bombing is 160 (not 110) and u're certain u kill the arty, and when u use CAS the 50 ammo difference doesn't matter much at all. The only reason u may consider using AT strafe against that is when u haven't reached enough CP for Stuka bomb and ur opponent is pressuring u much with dat b4
Posts: 1217
Posts: 2779
No, stuka dive bomb should counter it.
Cheaper stuff, that I find imbalanced.
While ML-20 is safe, B4 will die 100% of the time.
Posts: 1702
Posts: 2779
Well, i guess this doctrine isint too OP. STUG E is more ridiciluos.
CAS is okay.
Posts: 611
Well, i guess this doctrine isint too OP. STUG E is more ridiciluos.
CAS is okay.
Posts: 1702
Stug E is only Op when players blatantly fail to prepare for it. It can easily be fended off with a couple of bazookers but most people don't bother because they believe zooks dont do enough damage.
Watched a game tonight where Northwestfresh spammed 3 of them doing huge damage to his opponent. But his opponent failed the same way usf fail against CAS, by failing to adapt. No mines on choke points, blobbing infantry and trying to attack areas where stug e was present. Instead he threw away huge advantage and game because he wouldn't adapt.
Posts: 611
You don't actually play this game.. Do you?
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1702
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
14 |