I understand that this opinion may be unpopular but I belive that what we need to ballance LMGs is to make them realistic.
As some one who grew up with the Close Combat games i can see what you mean and you raise some good points.
Suggestion to LMG change
30 Jan 2015, 15:45 PM
#21
Posts: 229
As some one who grew up with the Close Combat games i can see what you mean and you raise some good points.
AKA Domestic Dude
30 Jan 2015, 16:50 PM
#22
Posts: 1164
+1 ferwiner
That sounds in the right direction. Using a squad with an LMG should feel very different to a normal squad.
Having a bit more set up time would make it feel like more of a fire support weapon which it is, and would make a squad which is moving a lot perform better without one.
It would also better reward an opponent who flanks and or uses names against them by forcing the squad to keep repositioning.
That sounds in the right direction. Using a squad with an LMG should feel very different to a normal squad.
Having a bit more set up time would make it feel like more of a fire support weapon which it is, and would make a squad which is moving a lot perform better without one.
It would also better reward an opponent who flanks and or uses names against them by forcing the squad to keep repositioning.
31 Jan 2015, 08:09 AM
#23
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
I still don't like this idea. I mean as cruzz said, any more utility or buff for infantry would encourage people to blob MOAR.
Just look at Defensive stance. People just put a squad behind their lines so you can not flank them, they don't have set-up/break-up time so they easily doge grenades, mortar etc. We desperately need some LMG changes (nurfz) but I still think giving suppression to LMGs would change things for worse.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think every weapon had a suppression value in vCoH, even bolt action rifles. So a major force of LMGs, assault rifles and tank top gunners could suppress your units after a while. I did not like that.
Just look at Defensive stance. People just put a squad behind their lines so you can not flank them, they don't have set-up/break-up time so they easily doge grenades, mortar etc. We desperately need some LMG changes (nurfz) but I still think giving suppression to LMGs would change things for worse.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but I think every weapon had a suppression value in vCoH, even bolt action rifles. So a major force of LMGs, assault rifles and tank top gunners could suppress your units after a while. I did not like that.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
133 | ||
 |
|
|
35 | ||
|
|
|
|
24 | ||
 |
|
|
13 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
68 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.845.944+25
- 2.843223.791+6
- 3.1103405.731+8
- 4.37559.864+21
- 5.943411.696-1
- 6.281108.722+32
- 7.308114.730+4
- 8.725441.622+3
- 9.10729.787+8
- 10.19465.749+7
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
13
Download
1278
Board Info
334 users are online:
334 guests
2 posts in the last 24h
14 posts in the last week
67 posts in the last month
14 posts in the last week
67 posts in the last month
Registered members: 50677
Welcome our newest member, Warzxxec33
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Warzxxec33
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM