Login

russian armor

Panzershrecks outrange T70 and T34

2 Jan 2015, 23:05 PM
#21
avatar of BrutusHR

Posts: 262



Oh man coming from the guy with literally 8 allied games

spare all of us with ur bullshit


Don't need more than that


Just FYI question, does this playercard reads games against bots?
2 Jan 2015, 23:06 PM
#22
avatar of LemonJuice

Posts: 1144 | Subs: 7



no one builds t3 anymore. u wont be fighting p4's u will be fighting panthers and above, not to mention a vet 2 p4 will consistently bounce zooks. That's my main issue with usf.

if shreks rape ur shermans, ( as wher could call a heavy or tech for panther) u cant tech and call in a heavy or wait for a call in. if obers rape ur rifles, u have no non doc elite infantry to fight them. its like playing as wehr with super grens that don't scale well and p4's

once the panther hits vet. zooks have become a waste.

and for the shreks. the shr3ks wont kill the Sherman. a panther, pak, or anything else will make short work of it


except that rifles scale better than lmg grens thanks to the fact you can buy 2 bars or 2 lmgs on them (dont say 'oh it costs more' yeah no shit but it still means they scale better). hell, vet 3 rifles with 2 bars can literally charge over open ground, and consistently kill vet 3 lmg grens in green cover. imo shermans are the best medium armor since it can come out pretty fast, costs 110 fuel, and has the highest squad wipe potential with HE rounds as well as having the best mounted MG.

as usf you just want to bully the shit out of the enemy player in the early game.

the problem for me is WHEN to tech bars. i havent experimented enough, but i THINK the best time is probably after major, but i think theres viability in getting bars after your first light vehicle to really bully volks and grens.
2 Jan 2015, 23:14 PM
#23
avatar of QueenRatchet123

Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2

Permanently Banned


Don't need more than that


Just FYI question, does this playercard reads games against bots?


I guess with 8 games u must know everything about sov and usf?

stop with the sarcasm. almost everyone here has more credibility than you

@lemon I agree with all ur points, but basically ur saying win fast or lose hard?

not very fun when u can have long fun games with OKW. and the opposite while playing usf
2 Jan 2015, 23:27 PM
#25
avatar of LemonJuice

Posts: 1144 | Subs: 7

yah im saying win fast. why play for the late game when youll have a tougher time then.
2 Jan 2015, 23:30 PM
#26
avatar of BrutusHR

Posts: 262



I guess with 8 games u must know everything about sov and usf?

stop with the sarcasm. almost everyone here has more credibility than you


Sarcasm? Never heard of it, and sorry, but last thing to be worried is credibility by people like you, didn't even knew that i had any on this forum, heh, but thanks for such a cheap laugh.

QueenRatchet123 and credibility. oxymoron* right there
2 Jan 2015, 23:35 PM
#27
avatar of Von Kluge
Patrion 14

Posts: 3548 | Subs: 2

Let's stop with the personal attacks here and be nice kiddo's!

thanks
2 Jan 2015, 23:38 PM
#28
avatar of Purlictor

Posts: 393



hell, vet 3 rifles with 2 bars can literally charge over open ground, and consistently kill vet 3 lmg grens in green cover.


Source? Because judging from my experience this is far from true.


imo shermans are the best medium armor since it can come out pretty fast, costs 110 fuel, and has the highest squad wipe potential with HE rounds as well as having the best mounted MG.


For sure, the Sherman is a beast and doesn't incur the big teching penalties Ostheer runs into when trying to get T3.

The problem with panzerschrecks is that pretty much every OKW squad will have them and are incredibly easy to use. Just a-move to the tank. They almost never miss. Not to mention they are the perfect supporting AT. I guess OKW needs it since they lack a good AT gun but it just makes OKW even easier to play than it already is since you need not worry about good positioning with your volks/rakketenwerfer when comparing them to traditional ATGs.
2 Jan 2015, 23:40 PM
#29
avatar of Sarantini
Honorary Member Badge
Donator 22

Posts: 2181

ya shreck are way too accurate at long range, they should be a defensive midrange tool imo
2 Jan 2015, 23:43 PM
#30
avatar of BrutusHR

Posts: 262

Let's stop with the personal attacks here and be nice kiddo's!

thanks


Sure thing boss. But this is pure gold! :thumbsup:


Back on topic... If we are looking for a shreck nerf, then a okw AT need a serious buff. imo

2 Jan 2015, 23:45 PM
#31
avatar of Jaigen

Posts: 1130



no one builds t3 anymore. u wont be fighting p4's u will be fighting panthers and above, not to mention a vet 2 p4 will consistently bounce zooks. That's my main issue with usf.

if shreks rape ur shermans, ( as wher could call a heavy or tech for panther) u cant tech and call in a heavy or wait for a call in. if obers rape ur rifles, u have no non doc elite infantry to fight them. its like playing as wehr with super grens that don't scale well and p4's

once the panther hits vet. zooks have become a waste.

and for the shreks. the shr3ks wont kill the Sherman. a panther, pak, or anything else will make short work of it


Last time i checked the okw consisted out of vehicles and heavy tanks. and the shreks do not automatically penetrate the is2 or kv1.
3 Jan 2015, 00:07 AM
#33
avatar of LemonJuice

Posts: 1144 | Subs: 7



Source? Because judging from my experience this is far from true.



For sure, the Sherman is a beast and doesn't incur the big teching penalties Ostheer runs into when trying to get T3.

The problem with panzerschrecks is that pretty much every OKW squad will have them and are incredibly easy to use. Just a-move to the tank. They almost never miss. Not to mention they are the perfect supporting AT. I guess OKW needs it since they lack a good AT gun but it just makes OKW even easier to play than it already is since you need not worry about good positioning with your volks/rakketenwerfer when comparing them to traditional ATGs.


source is just some testing ciez and i did. this isnt taking into consideration anything other than the fact that its a vet 3 rifle squad with 2 bars, running over no cover, at vet 3 grens in green. rifles win with 1 or 2 models standing. bar dps is actually quite impressive. we ran it multiple times to see if it was just rng the first time, but each time the rifles won.





3 Jan 2015, 00:22 AM
#34
avatar of sneakking

Posts: 655

Permanently Banned


source is just some testing ciez and i did. this isnt taking into consideration anything other than the fact that its a vet 3 rifle squad with 2 bars, running over no cover, at vet 3 grens in green. rifles win with 1 or 2 models standing. bar dps is actually quite impressive. we ran it multiple times to see if it was just rng the first time, but each time the rifles won.







Tests are worthless without proof of tests, either take lots of screenshots or upload replay. Not that I'm calling you a liar, just saying. And how many times did you run the test? 2 or 3 trials wont give you a very accurate picture.
3 Jan 2015, 00:49 AM
#35
avatar of LemonJuice

Posts: 1144 | Subs: 7



Tests are worthless without proof of tests, either take lots of screenshots or upload replay. Not that I'm calling you a liar, just saying. And how many times did you run the test? 2 or 3 trials wont give you a very accurate picture.


i dont really care if you believe me or not, and i dont really feel like redoing them either. its not like these tests are difficult to reproduce on your own with cheat mod.
3 Jan 2015, 00:52 AM
#36
avatar of sneakking

Posts: 655

Permanently Banned


i dont really care if you believe me or not, and i dont really feel like redoing them either. its not like these tests are difficult to reproduce on your own with cheat mod.


I just said that I did believe you :facepalm: and yes given how easy the tests are producing tangible results to be shared should be equally simple.
3 Jan 2015, 01:10 AM
#37
avatar of Jaigen

Posts: 1130



Tests are worthless without proof of tests, either take lots of screenshots or upload replay. Not that I'm calling you a liar, just saying. And how many times did you run the test? 2 or 3 trials wont give you a very accurate picture.


simply looking at the stats should be sufficient. the shrek does do slightly more dps and if every single shot of the zooka penetrates it can kill the p4 around the same as the shrek.
3 Jan 2015, 01:29 AM
#38
avatar of NinjaWJ

Posts: 2070

DPS doesn't really matter if we are comparing schrecks and bazookas. No one is going to let their tank sit there for more than 20 seconds ( im being very generous). What really matters is range, penetration and damage, and to an extent, aim time and reload.
3 Jan 2015, 02:45 AM
#39
avatar of Casparitus

Posts: 154 | Subs: 2



I watched that game, it was on Stephenns stream, was hilarious.


https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=66g5IqICuB4

It was me.

WOW, hahaa, didnt realize this post had accumulated to many replys since yesterday... Ah well.
3 Jan 2015, 02:59 AM
#40
avatar of Nuclear Arbitor
Patrion 28

Posts: 2470

yah im saying win fast. why play for the late game when youll have a tougher time then.


sounds like eldar vs SM in DoW2. officially sanctioned shitty match up btw.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

651 users are online: 651 guests
0 post in the last 24h
0 post in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49427
Welcome our newest member, Baqis73421
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM