What Mobas have that CoH franchise do not, is their player base is huge. Most players begin playing because some of their RL friends play, so they suck up the fact that they are stomped and stick with the game to improve and play with their already decently skilled friends. I see no incentive like this in CoH, except if a bunch of friends pick up the game and keep playing together past the noob level (that would probably happen, but far less often that for games like LoL or Dota2).
I also think the WW2 themed multiplayer market is strongly occupied by WoT, which is quite popular (and as much noob-unfriendly as MOBA games). The community brings new people in a game, not the game itself (well to an extent, if they enjoy the SP content a lot, they'll stick with the game, but as someone mentioned, they'll most probably only play compstomps afterwards).
Enf of 2014, Coh2 gaining players
6 Jan 2015, 10:15 AM
#21
Posts: 400
6 Jan 2015, 10:41 AM
#22
9 
Posts: 1094 | Subs: 20
What Mobas have that CoH franchise do not, is their player base is huge. Most players begin playing because some of their RL friends play, so they suck up the fact that they are stomped and stick with the game to improve and play with their already decently skilled friends. I see no incentive like this in CoH, except if a bunch of friends pick up the game and keep playing together past the noob level (that would probably happen, but far less often that for games like LoL or Dota2).
I also think the WW2 themed multiplayer market is strongly occupied by WoT, which is quite popular (and as much noob-unfriendly as MOBA games). The community brings new people in a game, not the game itself (well to an extent, if they enjoy the SP content a lot, they'll stick with the game, but as someone mentioned, they'll most probably only play compstomps afterwards).
That's a very good point you mention there. CoH2 lacks a ladder system that keeps people motivated (similar to the Lvl 20 system in vCoH). The ladder system as it is right now does not provide this.
6 Jan 2015, 11:12 AM
#23
1 
Posts: 641 | Subs: 1
That's a very good point you mention there. CoH2 lacks a ladder system that keeps people motivated (similar to the Lvl 20 system in vCoH). The ladder system as it is right now does not provide this.
Exactly. i have been saying this since release. BUT you know its 2015, we must be EXCITED <DRINK>
ketetof shudnt b allaud tew tawlk abowt balence hee s biasd
6 Jan 2015, 14:13 PM
#24
4 
Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
What Mobas have that CoH franchise do not, is their player base is huge. Most players begin playing because some of their RL friends play, so they suck up the fact that they are stomped and stick with the game to improve and play with their already decently skilled friends. I see no incentive like this in CoH, except if a bunch of friends pick up the game and keep playing together past the noob level (that would probably happen, but far less often that for games like LoL or Dota2).
I also think the WW2 themed multiplayer market is strongly occupied by WoT, which is quite popular (and as much noob-unfriendly as MOBA games). The community brings new people in a game, not the game itself (well to an extent, if they enjoy the SP content a lot, they'll stick with the game, but as someone mentioned, they'll most probably only play compstomps afterwards).
+1. that's what happened when i got into dota2.
if i hadn't found some ppl to play with online in coh2 after like 2 months, i don't think i would have been playing it until now.
 | Playercard of Bo-Bobby Lion | |||||||||||||||
|
6 Jan 2015, 14:33 PM
#25
Posts: 165
.... and the numbers are back down to sub 4000.
6 Jan 2015, 14:43 PM
#26
Posts: 1
New guy reporting for duty! Whats my appointed station sir?
6 Jan 2015, 14:47 PM
#27
Posts: 1802 | Subs: 1
Well that's good news for SEGA. Even if they stop playing, they have already paid for the game.
6 Jan 2015, 14:59 PM
#28
Posts: 2238 | Subs: 15
.... and the numbers are back down to sub 4000.
Like I said: less than 2 weeks.
COH3 COMPETITIVE SERIES PACK #1
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2961573188&savesuccess=1
https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=2961573188&savesuccess=1
6 Jan 2015, 15:33 PM
#29
Posts: 1963 | Subs: 1
New guy reporting for duty! Whats my appointed station sir?Report To Field Marshall AmiPolizeiFunk. You'll find him in Berlin, Private!
_____________________________________________________________________________
6 Jan 2015, 17:32 PM
#30
Posts: 341
.... and the numbers are back down to sub 4000.
LOL. Does this mean I should feel good if over two and a half thousand people have subscribed to one of my maps since I uploaded it on the 19th Dec?
Or bad because it probably won't get much higher than that?
6 Jan 2015, 20:03 PM
#31
Posts: 165
Good ... must be a great map!
6 Jan 2015, 20:48 PM
#32
Posts: 1534 | Subs: 1
Don't judge the player base from the information on steam charts.
Steam charts only shows the number of players online per hour, it cannot tell you if they're the same players always logging on, also remember timezones, when 6k of EU log off another 3K log on from another part of the planet.
Steam charts only shows the number of players online per hour, it cannot tell you if they're the same players always logging on, also remember timezones, when 6k of EU log off another 3K log on from another part of the planet.
6 Jan 2015, 20:52 PM
#33
Posts: 1534 | Subs: 1
On another note this is a great article about how valve implemented some key features which made cs:go an esports success and the same formula was applied to dota 2 aswell.
How CS:GO turned itself around
How CS:GO turned itself around
6 Jan 2015, 22:11 PM
#34
Posts: 449
On another note this is a great article about how valve implemented some key features which made cs:go an esports success and the same formula was applied to dota 2 aswell.
How CS:GO turned itself around
CS:GO's success makes me sad. It's basically a shitty game filled with asperger-bait fluff to suck people in and keep them playing, creating and spending.
7 Jan 2015, 02:21 AM
#35
4 Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
CS:GO's success makes me sad. It's basically a shitty game filled with asperger-bait fluff to suck people in and keep them playing, creating and spending.
wuattt? if the core game wasn't that good (it's fantastic and unique imo), all the 'asperger-bait fluff' wouldn't have done much to keep ppl around.
| Playercard of Bo-Bobby Lion | |||||||||||||||
|
7 Jan 2015, 04:02 AM
#36
Posts: 300
I still dont find myself actively playing simply due to matchmaking. In a nutshell I either stomp guys who barely know what they're doing with almost no challenge or get destroyed by guys with 500+ hours (I have around 50 legit hours and alot of that was singleplayer)
| Playercard of PyroPlazma | |||||||||||||||||||
|
7 Jan 2015, 04:06 AM
#37
Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2
There are plenty of people with loads of play time who are not that good
I might be one of them
Also you only have a rank in 1v1 US, in any other mode you don't have enough games to have a rank so you'll be assigned at random
I might be one of them
Also you only have a rank in 1v1 US, in any other mode you don't have enough games to have a rank so you'll be assigned at random
Resident Soviet Whiner and Grand Master Bias Jedi; General Secretary of the Soviet Whine Hydra Collective; Axis Hating Sheeple; Allied Butt Buddy! Collect Them All!
Also the African Branch of TAB Bulletins
PS: The Italian Army fought with courage and skill
Also the African Branch of TAB Bulletins
PS: The Italian Army fought with courage and skill
7 Jan 2015, 04:08 AM
#38
Posts: 1963 | Subs: 1
There are plenty of people with loads of play time who are not that goodCount me in.
I might be one of them
_____________________________________________________________________________
7 Jan 2015, 04:16 AM
#39
Posts: 300
There are plenty of people with loads of play time who are not that good
I might be one of them
Also you only have a rank in 1v1 US, in any other mode you don't have enough games to have a rank so you'll be assigned at random
I only queue 1v1 or 2v2 im not stupid enough to play 3v3/4v4 as allies
| Playercard of PyroPlazma | |||||||||||||||||||
|
7 Jan 2015, 17:52 PM
#40
Posts: 449
wuattt? if the core game wasn't that good (it's fantastic and unique imo), all the 'asperger-bait fluff' wouldn't have done much to keep ppl around.
And yet the core game hasn't changed significantly since release (I don't consider balance changes to be part of the 'core' but rather game engine, abilities, options).
Or look at it this way: how many other games would see a significant spike in users and user retention if they included an equivalent of marketplace, workshop, operations, etc?
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
16 | ||
 |
|
|
2 | ||
 |
|
|
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.653231.739+13
- 2.839223.790+2
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.592234.717-1
- 5.278108.720+29
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.645.928+5
- 8.922406.694+1
- 9.1121623.643+2
- 10.265138.658+2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
10
Download
1244
Board Info
978 users are online:
978 guests
0 post in the last 24h
0 post in the last week
28 posts in the last month
0 post in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49401
Welcome our newest member, caraejoyce
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, caraejoyce
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM