Fixed positions is automatch

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 76

So as title and poll says.
Do you agree that automatch should have fixed positions?

Personally i dont like it and i have no idea why relic did it.

Posts: 710

Plain and simple: no.

Please change this Relic.

Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2

Playercard of Bo-Bobby Lion

	3v3: P	streak: - 3
	3v3: P	streak: + 8
	3v3: P	streak: - 3
	3v3: P	streak: - 2

Playercard of Bo-Bobby Lion

3v3: P	streak: - 3
2v2: P	streak: - 2	with Ohme
2v2: P	streak: + 1	with Ohme
2v2: P	streak: + 3	with Medman

Multi Quote

Posts: 431

I feel like the maps are this way designed that some spwans favor different factions. So yes please, keep them as they are.

Posts: 188

I think its good cause it means maps can be balanced knowing what factions will have their base where

Posts: 641 | Subs: 1

so you are forced to play as one faction on fixed position in tourney but thats not good for automatch? i dont get it. i love the change tbh

Posts: 431

Germans starting at the left on Semois? In the North of Langres? This would be strange since the map balance is different this way.

Posts: 467

Yes I like it more tbh.

Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2

30 Oct 2014, 12:07 PMRandomName

I feel like the maps are this way designed that some spwans favor different factions. So yes please, keep them as they are.

that's good point. but tbh, many maps are just blatantly/fairly one sided no matter the faction. and the fact that one faction gets that side all the time isn't far

Playercard of Bo-Bobby Lion

	3v3: P	streak: - 3
	3v3: P	streak: + 8
	3v3: P	streak: - 3
	3v3: P	streak: - 2

Playercard of Bo-Bobby Lion

3v3: P	streak: - 3
2v2: P	streak: - 2	with Ohme
2v2: P	streak: + 1	with Ohme
2v2: P	streak: + 3	with Medman

Multi Quote

Posts: 934

They could keep fixed spawns if they reversed the Allies/Axis spawn for the majority of 1v1 maps. I honestly wouldn't mind this, however at the moment it is all wrong and is literally unfair/boring.

For automatch I still prefer random positions as it lets you use a lot more strategies and increases replayability.

Posts: 44

30 Oct 2014, 12:31 PMpigsoup

that's good point. but tbh, many maps are just blatantly/fairly one sided no matter the faction. and the fact that one faction gets that side all the time isn't far

That's what it seems like to me also. So they either need to randomize spawns again, or (better yet) fix the maps.

Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

30 Oct 2014, 12:40 PMStephennJF

They could keep fixed spawns if they reversed the Allies/Axis spawn for the majority of 1v1 maps. I honestly wouldn't mind this, however at the moment it is all wrong and is literally unfair/boring.

For automatch I still prefer random positions as it lets you use a lot more strategies and increases replayability.

My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.

Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.

Multi Quote

Posts: 1970 | Subs: 5

random is better for variety and fun, fixed is better for competitive. In automatch I could see it either way. But yeah a lot of maps need to be reversed.

Playercard of Romeo

1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: P
1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: None	4v4: P
1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: P	4v4: P
1v1: P	2v2: P	3v3: None	4v4: None

Multi Quote

Posts: 2238 | Subs: 15

the E-sport plan....

Posts: 732

30 Oct 2014, 18:51 PMRomeo

random is better for variety and fun, fixed is better for competitive. In automatch I could see it either way. But yeah a lot of maps need to be reversed.