Quality or Quantity tanks
10 Oct 2014, 17:21 PM
#1

Posts: 7
What i mean is panzer IV's VS Tiger, t-34's VS IS-2 panzer II -jagdpanzers VS a king tiger etc. One can always buy like 2-3 T-34's for a IS-2 or 2 panzer 4's for a tiger or more.And one can also keep making those "quantity tanks".What i wonder is,which one is better to go for ? A IS-2 seems to have a lot of punch but not fast as t-34's.And in numbers t-34's can always win.Same goes for panzer IV'S
10 Oct 2014, 18:39 PM
#2

Posts: 2807 | Subs: 6
thanks to Relic we can even spam Tigers or IS-2, ISU-152's, for now Tier tanks are not a good idea to spam them while you can have good quality tanks in big numbers
10 Oct 2014, 21:38 PM
#3


Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2
Heavy tanks will live and gain vet while not costing fuel
Medium tanks have to be expendable to fight heavies but are too expensive to be expendable
Medium tanks have to be expendable to fight heavies but are too expensive to be expendable
11 Oct 2014, 01:04 AM
#4

Posts: 818
I think it depends on the map and your playstyle. But The only tank worth spamming that isn't from a doctrine is the panther, however teching costs make that very hard to do
11 Oct 2014, 17:29 PM
#5

Posts: 365
you have to micro each tank individually to make good use of it. so as you add each tank to your army, the quality of each tank goes down. if i build 2 t34s its so i can repair one while i fight with the other and then swap them out. Only time i might bring in both of them is if the other player tries to make a power player with a big tank and i manage to pin it (so i start sending everything i have at it)
12 Oct 2014, 09:59 AM
#6

Posts: 7
Thank you all for answers.
I think il go for a good tank and preserve it and vet it.

13 Oct 2014, 15:21 PM
#7

Posts: 154 | Subs: 2
Spamming doctrinal tanks is what 99% games comes down to.
17 Oct 2014, 15:05 PM
#8

Posts: 1225
Spamming doctrinal tanks is what 99% games comes down to.
What this man says. Worse, 34/76s are specifically very vulnerable to Tigers, and PIVs are even more vulnerable to IS-2s.
17 Oct 2014, 15:48 PM
#9

Posts: 399 | Subs: 1
Quantity has a quality all it's own
22 Oct 2014, 16:55 PM
#10

Posts: 344
If you have many tanks it's hard to micro them specially on small maps with city areas.
22 Oct 2014, 20:25 PM
#11

Posts: 432
I think many that play as Americans or Russians don't quite understand the strength in quantity and how it allows for more options overall.
The biggest problem I have ever faced as Germans is never having enough units on the field to counter any large blobbed action.
There always seems to be so many more shocks/rifleblobs and so many more jacksons/shermans that it seems near impossible to take such overwhelming odds head on. You gotta bait them into losing half their force on an assault, blunting themselves against your defenses.
The biggest problem I have ever faced as Germans is never having enough units on the field to counter any large blobbed action.
There always seems to be so many more shocks/rifleblobs and so many more jacksons/shermans that it seems near impossible to take such overwhelming odds head on. You gotta bait them into losing half their force on an assault, blunting themselves against your defenses.
23 Oct 2014, 14:57 PM
#12

Posts: 2070
Ill just leave this quote by Relic here:
"Allies are more difficult to play as a result of their high unit count and low power ratio per unit. For example, instead of heaving one super heavy Tiger, the USF have two or three Sherman Tanks. In theory, the USF player possesses a relatively similar army value; in practice the execution of this army requires greater coordination. Short term, our goal is to target a few problematic units or upgrades to better align the factional balance. Long term, we will be addressing faction scaling, how the power of a faction compounds into the late game, and difficulty of play related to Allied army composition.
That said, other factors will likely be added to that list as we further investigate some of the challenges players are facing."
"Allies are more difficult to play as a result of their high unit count and low power ratio per unit. For example, instead of heaving one super heavy Tiger, the USF have two or three Sherman Tanks. In theory, the USF player possesses a relatively similar army value; in practice the execution of this army requires greater coordination. Short term, our goal is to target a few problematic units or upgrades to better align the factional balance. Long term, we will be addressing faction scaling, how the power of a faction compounds into the late game, and difficulty of play related to Allied army composition.
That said, other factors will likely be added to that list as we further investigate some of the challenges players are facing."
PAGES (1)

1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
SHOUT IT OUT!



KoRneY: @aerafield It's possible that it is underpriced for what it is capable of now, no need to go full retard and take it immediately as a massive problem. It costs 60 more MP than a pz.3 and in 2v2 the barrage can be quite strong.
Last Friday, 19:14 PM
Last Friday, 19:14 PM
OKSpitfire: I do like that they made the Stuka more expensive instead of nerfing it into the ground though. Found it pretty unsatisfying to use before that buff a while back....
Last Thursday, 16:35 PM
Last Thursday, 16:35 PM
aerafield: USF already is by far the shittiest faction in terms of countering blobbing and turtling, now they supposedly have one overtuned tool locked behind a BG and it's immediately a massive problem?
Last Thursday, 13:33 PM
Last Thursday, 13:33 PM
Lady Xenarra: I think post-2.0 Whizbang buffs, the price is too low esp since the Stuka got nerfed in cost too. Speaking of which, how exactly is one supposed to successfully dive this Sherman in disguise? Med tank spam running into SSFs?
Last Thursday, 12:13 PM
Last Thursday, 12:13 PM
OKSpitfire: A powerful, doctrinal unit that outperforms stock stuff? Colour me shocked! 
Last Thursday, 10:49 AM

Last Thursday, 10:49 AM
Lady Xenarra: WTB Whizzbang for DAK instead of Stuka, 5 fuel cheape, 60MP more expensive and next to impossible to dive. 
Last Wednesday, 20:27 PM

Last Wednesday, 20:27 PM
Rosbone: It is also hard to expect Relic to help Coh2 when they cant even make working menus in Coh3 yet, 2 years after release and at full price+ for DLCs. Thats like asking a fish to do calculus.
Last Tuesday, 02:58 AM
Last Tuesday, 02:58 AM
Rosbone: But this last patch has made good progress for grabbing players. All we can hope is Coh3 gets to Coh2s quality level before everyone abandons the franchise. Its Relic so they will completely f*%k it up as usual. But its a hope/cope.
Last Tuesday, 02:55 AM
Last Tuesday, 02:55 AM
Rosbone: Relic wants Coh2 to fail so players will migrate to Coh3. It is hard to blame them since Coh3 sucks so bad. It needs all the help it can get.
Last Tuesday, 02:53 AM
Last Tuesday, 02:53 AM
situsgbo777: Platform game online terpercaya dengan berbagai pilihan permainan seru dan peluang menang besar. Nikmati pengalaman bermain terbaik hanya di GBO777
Last Monday, 06:48 AM
Last Monday, 06:48 AM
aerafield: @OKSpitfire tbh I find it quite challenging to get the Pershing in time, having to suffer through the CoH3 tickrate and this endless bullshit meta of massive blobs going back and forth to the forward heal truck
01 Mar 2025, 17:24 PM
01 Mar 2025, 17:24 PM
OKSpitfire: Well... going to be seeing the Pershing a lot for a little while, that thing is a monster.
01 Mar 2025, 11:44 AM
01 Mar 2025, 11:44 AM
Livestreams
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
182 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
107 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
14 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
32 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
19 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
2 | ||
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.42963.872+7
- 2.52875.876+1
- 3.303163.650+3
- 4.289112.721+1
- 5.12644.741-1
- 6.312114.732+8
- 7.756435.635+4
- 8.14760.710-2
- 9.13765.678+5
- 10.6817.800+6
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★
-
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel
-
Heartless Jäger

Einhoven Country

Honor it
13

Download
1333
Board Info
308 users are online:
308 guests
0 post in the last 24h
18 posts in the last week
62 posts in the last month
18 posts in the last week
62 posts in the last month
Registered members: 52349
Welcome our newest member, republicaneagle1
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, republicaneagle1
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM