4 VS 4 is as important as 1 VS 1
- This thread is locked
Posts: 42
I have not made a post here since a long time. I did post on Relic's forum. but the axis propaganda and fanboys are so crude over there, that i am triyng here to see other opinions. Maybe i'm the only one feeling this way after all.
As of now, i see two possible options for Relic : shut down the 3 VS 3 AND the 4 VS 4 (if it's not important ... and if it's only for fun, then it is not fun actually so why bother) ... till they can balance the game or just let them go if they don't want to have fair 4 VS 4. But if they are really looking for eSport, they have to consider that there are players that love TEAM Sports. Why, because it's fun. And it offers a lot of options for strategy and so on. And, it's true that WW2 was not won by a single army ...
As of now i will just stop playing the game alltogether. After playing a couple of 4 VS 4 as axis player (i did not play them a lot, and have not for the past months) it was just a walk in the park ... No challenge whatsoever. No interest in waiting in a line for killing some poor people (wanting to have fun) playing allied. For me it feels like the americans are figthting with sticks and stones ... No glory in winning a game as a german.
And for those interested in the pseudo historical values, i have to remind them that in the end, the axis lost it all ... Too bad to have to let go a game that i love. I still think fondly of Company of Heroes Online. Yes it was unbalanced, but you could always try something new, there were epics fights and reversals, and most of all: It was really FUN. COH2, in the present state, is not.
I still cherish the fights fought on the road N13, on Steelpack and Montargis ...
So long soldiers.
Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8
4v4 is not and will never be balanced, get over it, its impossible.
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently BannedBattles are based on LOCAL victories.
But, i agree with the op, allied players are non-existent. Relic needs to change this...
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
Posts: 2280 | Subs: 2
Permanently BannedAll these 4v4 activists reminds me of CoH2 version of FEMEN.
4v4 is not and will never be balanced, get over it, its impossible.
Wow./ the army of relic defenders appear to defend their poor design choices.
For Real! stop saying it wont ever be balanced.
The 4v4 player base is much larger than the 1v1 and 2v2 player base. Saying things like this. is excluding a huge part of this community.
Shit! i bet if 4v4's were balanced and 1v1's were not. You would feel the same as the OP
Posts: 2070
Posts: 42
And i persist, even if it was unbalanced, COHO was challenging and fun at the same time, in 1 VS 1 up to 4 VS 4.
Posts: 42
Posts: 951
You are about 3% of the player base yet you sweep all before you.
All your game modes R belong to us.
Posts: 951
4v4 was never balanced nor competetive in any sense. COH was never about 3v3 or 4v4. Play 1v1 if you want the best balance and possibly game experience possible.
Wow. Just.... wow.
Posts: 976
But knowing how corporate staff like money, they will pressure the devs to fix the game, it's just a matter of time. Just go play another game and come back when there is a meaningful patch fixing the 4vs4 allies side.
Thanks.
P.S : 4vs4 don't need to be perfectly balanced, but it just need to be enough fun to worth playing it...
Posts: 692
All these 4v4 activists reminds me of CoH2 version of FEMEN.
4v4 is not and will never be balanced, get over it, its impossible.
How would you know? You've got to have 3x as many posts as games played. You've got to be the most ignorant person here outside of vetlolcake
4v4 doesn't have to be completely balanced, but blatant problems can and should be fixed
Stop posting this crap
Posts: 432
Livestreams
14 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.829222.789+35
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.587233.716+3
- 4.1095612.641+19
- 5.894399.691+4
- 6.486194.715-1
- 7.280162.633+8
- 8.1004649.607+5
- 9.304113.729+4
- 10.379114.769+1
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger