Hi everyone,
I have played this map a few times and I win/lose on it about as often as I do on any other map, so this isn't a whine thread.
This map is great for 1v1 but for 2v2 it's just terrible because it's so small. The fighting is so close to the bases that you barely even need to get reinforcement bunkers as Ostheer. There is barely any room for flanking and it encourages static game play.
I think in the future I will spend one of my vetoes on this map when searching 2v2. Is this the right call, or is the map fine for 2v2 and I'm just playing it wrong?
Crossing in the Woods - not a 2v2 map?
14 Sep 2014, 05:28 AM
#1
Posts: 508
14 Sep 2014, 06:47 AM
#2
5
Posts: 16697 | Subs: 12
I can tell you that the map maker, OnkelSam, never intended it to be a 2v2 map.
14 Sep 2014, 06:51 AM
#3
Posts: 239
It kinda turns into a camp fest in 2v2's in my experience.
14 Sep 2014, 06:54 AM
#4
Posts: 896
Yes this is a good map for 1v1 and a bad map for 2v2. The problem is that there are worse maps in 2v2 automatch (manily the new campy wfa maps), so I never get the chance to veto it.
14 Sep 2014, 09:09 AM
#5
Posts: 589
There are many maps, in many modes that are simply not suitable to be there.
It's just laziness on relics behalf.
It's just laziness on relics behalf.
14 Sep 2014, 09:27 AM
#6
Posts: 2779
I wonder what would Langres become, if it adds into 2v2 pool.
14 Sep 2014, 09:33 AM
#7
Posts: 431
It is way too small for 2vs2. Better kick maps like this out of 2vs2 and bring Pripjat Winter back.
14 Sep 2014, 10:02 AM
#8
Posts: 254
14 Sep 2014, 10:35 AM
#9
Posts: 680
Love this map in 2v2 as you get to use mortars and arty which youll never or seldom get to use othervise. Great 2v2 map!
15 Sep 2014, 21:04 PM
#10
Posts: 61
I also think this is a great 2v2 map, it's a CQB map with lots of fast play and pressure.
15 Sep 2014, 21:08 PM
#11
Posts: 2238 | Subs: 15
horrible map for 2v2. Remove from 2v2 map pool RELIC...
what happened to OnkelSam?
what happened to OnkelSam?
15 Sep 2014, 21:20 PM
#12
2
Posts: 2181
I also think this is a great 2v2 map, it's a CQB map with lots of fast play and pressure.
for me it is the opposite; both sides camp the river bank with support weapons until the unflankable 70 range vehicles arrive.
Good map, but not for 2v2.
But people should have the choice so I prefer more vetoes over maps being compeltely removed from auto
PAGES (1)
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
42 | |||||
7 | |||||
51 | |||||
27 | |||||
23 | |||||
18 | |||||
3 | |||||
2 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.35057.860+15
- 3.1110614.644+11
- 4.624225.735+2
- 5.920405.694+4
- 6.276108.719+27
- 7.306114.729+2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
VS
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1236
Board Info
658 users are online:
658 guests
0 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49152
Welcome our newest member, Cummings
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Cummings
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM