Obersoldaten laugh at anything that doesn't use threads to move.
A fine example of a treaded piece of airborne american engineering. Obers don't laugh at these guys, that's for sure.
Sorry, that just had to be done
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Posts: 708 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1304 | Subs: 13
4 man crew(easy to kill with small arms) retarted animation of setup/desetup. Overpriced at 280 manpower and 35 manpower to reinforce. T2. Captured Mg34 with 6 man crew is far better.
Posts: 1702
Posts: 665
Posts: 1130
It's a good weapon, but a bit overpriced (280 MP for an MG that comes from T2?) and the crew is just way too fragile. Against Axis superior weapon damage, 4 men with received accuracy penalty just melts. It stops Volks and close-range infantry, but LMG42 grens and anything bigger can usually just outsnipe it.
The MG34 is not a great comparison point since I think it's a bit overpowered. At the very least it needs a price increase.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Posts: 665
this is a classic l2p . do you think that the germans have it any easier with the high dps of riflesquads? mg are not supposed to get hit period.
Posts: 1130
1- Don´t all support weapons (except AT guns) get increase received accuracy?
2-@Jaigen performance of Rifles shouldn´t be an excuse for performance of HMG. I would rather have people trying other builds rather than 4rifles LT light vehicle.
Posts: 1130
Third, MGs are not supposed get hit, ok so I imagine you would be totally fine if rifles or guards could stand in an MG42's field of fire and decrew it faster than they are being suppressed? I did it several times with Obers and Pfusiliers. Your Mgs will get hit so long as your opponent is not comatose. While the Maxim may be too durable, the M2 crew just dies too fast.
Posts: 665
You think rifles cannot do that? because they do. and once again your mg's are not supposed to get hit. second part 50 cals performs way better in buildings then the german mg's at its not a liability to put a mg inside a building.
Posts: 1026
this is a classic l2p . do you think that the germans have it any easier with the high dps of riflesquads? mg are not supposed to get hit period.
Posts: 1130
Back when they had 25% accuracy buff instead of a 25% recieved accuracy penalty, it was a fine unit. One of the better MGs. But it wasn't a balance issue, or OP. Now it's quite weak.
Posts: 708 | Subs: 1
You think rifles cannot do that? because they do. and once again your mg's are not supposed to get hit. second part 50 cals performs way better in buildings then the german mg's at its not a liability to put a mg inside a building.
Posts: 1702
In what way is it weak? it has the highest burst damage of any of the mg's and you are basically guaranteed a model loss if the 50 call starts firing. is it weak in suppression? nope its the highest suppressor in the game with the largest aoe. mobility ? fuck that its even more mobile then then the maxim. durability? same as the mg 42 or 34 and their is talk to nerf the maxim to 4 man.
the 50 cal is superior to the mg42 or mg34 by a mile. anybody saying this unit is weak is simply nuts.
Posts: 1221 | Subs: 41
the 50 cal is superior to the mg42 or mg34 by a mile. anybody saying this unit is weak is simply nuts.
Posts: 1026
In what way is it weak? it has the highest burst damage of any of the mg's and you are basically guaranteed a model loss if the 50 call starts firing. is it weak in suppression? nope its the highest suppressor in the game with the largest aoe. mobility ? fuck that its even more mobile then then the maxim. durability? same as the mg 42 or 34 and their is talk to nerf the maxim to 4 man.
the 50 cal is superior to the mg42 or mg34 by a mile. anybody saying this unit is weak is simply nuts.
Posts: 1130
It's actually the least durable MG in the game due to the fact that all axis units have proportionally higher DPS, to balance againts the higher 6 man squad sizes of soviets.
It's around the durability of a 2.66 man axis team weapon
59 | |||||
33 | |||||
5 | |||||
59 | |||||
48 | |||||
16 | |||||
3 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |