This is a dreadful commander. After minute 8, or whenever a p4 rolls out, it's completely useless.
As someone has already said, it should be renamed Light Vehicle Hunter Tactics.
Sovs have so few commander's that are actually viable in 3v3's and 4v4's it's a joke really.
New Soviet Commander: Tank Hunter Tactics
15 Sep 2014, 17:17 PM
#61
Posts: 41
15 Sep 2014, 18:02 PM
#62
Posts: 818
I think this commander could be viable with penal spam then getting cons later instead of AT guns, only it depends on how effective the penal spam is and would be munitions intensive, mabye need a cache or to control both points all game
But that sounds hard and risky so ill probably just stick to call in tanks which clearly work well.
But that sounds hard and risky so ill probably just stick to call in tanks which clearly work well.
 | Playercard of Hon3y | |||||||||||||||||||
|
15 Sep 2014, 18:04 PM
#63
Posts: 1617
It's one of the most useless commanders in-game atm.
15 Sep 2014, 19:01 PM
#64
Posts: 896
This commander would work against okw players that like to spam armored vehicles like the puma/ht/p2. Against them this commander would do well with a late t1.
15 Sep 2014, 19:16 PM
#65
Posts: 971
If T4 were able to deal with heavy tanks then this commander could be useful.
But SU85s are too weak against flanks/schrecks and their pathing is so horrible that you still need IS2 or ISU to have chances to win.
Any competitive doctrine needs a infantry and tank call-in because soviets doesn't have useful stock units. Sadly Tank Hunter Tactics doesn't have none of them.
But SU85s are too weak against flanks/schrecks and their pathing is so horrible that you still need IS2 or ISU to have chances to win.
Any competitive doctrine needs a infantry and tank call-in because soviets doesn't have useful stock units. Sadly Tank Hunter Tactics doesn't have none of them.
24 Feb 2015, 01:45 AM
#66
Posts: 104
I got romeo to cast a game a while back using this commander 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EV3fug9I9JU&list=PLLzJ-mmAx7RhBtZ6qfPK4RSeAe8DsWdps&index=66
It has a decent demonstration, would have like to used the anti-tank volley more often but the chance didn't arise
Its a nice Fresh commander that is actually a lot of fun to play. Bigger games or small ones.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EV3fug9I9JU&list=PLLzJ-mmAx7RhBtZ6qfPK4RSeAe8DsWdps&index=66
It has a decent demonstration, would have like to used the anti-tank volley more often but the chance didn't arise
Its a nice Fresh commander that is actually a lot of fun to play. Bigger games or small ones.
24 Feb 2015, 02:07 AM
#67
Posts: 1042
Finally used the Anti-tank bombing run in a ToW...
Knocked out about 30% health off a P4 and stunned it.
180munis just for that? You've got to be joking...
I remember when it was in testing the bombing run destroyed 2 tanks easily.
What a shame... the rest of the doctrine is just as bad.
Knocked out about 30% health off a P4 and stunned it.
180munis just for that? You've got to be joking...
I remember when it was in testing the bombing run destroyed 2 tanks easily.
What a shame... the rest of the doctrine is just as bad.
24 Feb 2015, 02:49 AM
#68
Posts: 104
Check the video , at about 18 mins, ish (if your not interested in whole video) I used the stun mine on a panther and called in the strike. took 90% of the panthers hp out. take a look 
24 Feb 2015, 02:51 AM
#69
4 
Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
Finally used the Anti-tank bombing run in a ToW...
Knocked out about 30% health off a P4 and stunned it.
180munis just for that? You've got to be joking...
I remember when it was in testing the bombing run destroyed 2 tanks easily.
What a shame... the rest of the doctrine is just as bad.
i think that is decent. it is basically fragmentation bomb on crack.
and salvage gives just shit ton of resources.
| Playercard of Bo-Bobby Lion | |||||||||||||||
|
24 Feb 2015, 03:45 AM
#70
Posts: 1042
^^
Still strikes me as a bit of a bad buy for 180 munis. The Il-2 normal bombing run costs about as much and ruins panzers...
What's a situation where this doctrine would actually work?
Still strikes me as a bit of a bad buy for 180 munis. The Il-2 normal bombing run costs about as much and ruins panzers...
What's a situation where this doctrine would actually work?
24 Feb 2015, 05:34 AM
#71
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
My controls weren't working
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
And if they were, you were playing dishonorably,
And if you weren't, you were playing without skill,
And if you were, it's not fun to play that way,
And if it is, you only care about winning.
Bible of Scrublord, Psalt 3:16.
24 Feb 2015, 07:40 AM
#72
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
^^
Still strikes me as a bit of a bad buy for 180 munis. The Il-2 normal bombing run costs about as much and ruins panzers...
What's a situation where this doctrine would actually work?
weird, i once used it on a panther and it was a juicy hit. dealt about 80%.
servant to the vet 5 königskübel
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
b4 and soviet FHQ enthusiast
fan of the illustrious black prince
24 Feb 2015, 10:51 AM
#73
Posts: 1042
Could be something to do with Theatre of War maybe, I've not survived long enough with the doctrine to be able to use the bombing call in.
24 Feb 2015, 13:09 PM
#74
4 Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2
yep. this game was what i think about whenever i try this doc. potent.
| Playercard of Bo-Bobby Lion | |||||||||||||||
|
24 Feb 2015, 13:19 PM
#75
Posts: 4630 | Subs: 2
PTRS avaible since 1CP or 2CPs.
Guards - 2CPs but PTRS - 3CPs
Guards - 2CPs but PTRS - 3CPs
24 Feb 2015, 13:25 PM
#76
Posts: 170
Wow that is a very interesting game to watch.
I believe Lenny could've won that pretty easily if he would've been a bit more careful having his tons of script squads a bit more active ie. decapping axis fuel and right vp more often especially in the mid to late game.
24 Feb 2015, 13:31 PM
#77
Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3
I wish that this fuel scavenging ability was add to more soviet commanders. That ability is just crazy.
If you need to know stats of certain unit: http://stat.coh2.hu
Which faction is OP and which is UP? Check it out here
Tips for beginners and wannabe pro's
Which faction is OP and which is UP? Check it out here
Tips for beginners and wannabe pro's
24 Feb 2015, 13:39 PM
#78
Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1
I wish that this fuel scavenging ability was add to more soviet commanders. That ability is just crazy.
That ability works well only if you already winning (successfully dealing with enemy vehicles).
It won't bring you back if you're losing (salvaging your own dead vehicles).
Therefore it falls under definition of win-more ability.
24 Feb 2015, 13:52 PM
#79
Posts: 170
Hmm what about kubels, light vehicles, medium tanks.
I think it can be quite powerful if executed correctly.
I think it can be quite powerful if executed correctly.
24 Feb 2015, 14:35 PM
#80
Posts: 1484
PTRS need a major buff honestly. Perhaps more armor penetration to at least make it close to the RPGs and make Guards useful.
| Playercard of WingZero | |||||||||||||||
|
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
130 | ||
 |
|
|
73 | ||
 |
|
|
126 | ||
 |
|
|
25 | ||
 |
|
|
13 | ||
|
|
|
|
10 | ||
|
|
|
|
9 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.35157.860+16
- 4.599234.719+7
- 5.934410.695-1
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
11
Download
1259
Board Info
523 users are online:
523 guests
0 post in the last 24h
12 posts in the last week
24 posts in the last month
12 posts in the last week
24 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49884
Welcome our newest member, Buchl759
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Buchl759
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM