I don´t think the Pershing would be a good addition to the game. I like that the US have this realistic flair of not relying on heavy tanks. One commander alone could destroy this gameplay and you would see Pershings in most of the games.
What´s needed (for the heavy tank skin) is a Sherman Jumbo. There was a 75mm and a 76mm armed version of it.
Who wants a M26 Pershing ?
14 Aug 2014, 15:06 PM
#21
Posts: 978
14 Aug 2014, 15:31 PM
#22
Posts: 1003
In team games it is 90:10 for germans. Why? 
Better late game tanks, decisions team games.
Better late game tanks, decisions team games.
I want to have the same chance, to win for each side.
14 Aug 2014, 18:38 PM
#23
Posts: 1210 | Subs: 1
No.
14 Aug 2014, 22:39 PM
#24
Posts: 954
43%ppl will pay for it.....good chance to grab money reric!
First off all. Tripwire so gud, 10 ammo for a whole dead squad ? + sight.
Vehicle capture point can win games, blitzkrieg save a tank. Fair Deal i think
14 Aug 2014, 23:00 PM
#25
Posts: 395
Pershing will be here with Ardennes offensive
I bought vCoH on January 3rd, 2007.
Still missing the days of vCoH 1.71. It had it's issues, like paks sniping 57s, and the strafe didn't work, but overall, it was probably the most balanced time in CoH history.
OF ruined that. CoH 2 is....balanced in a nasty way. Everyone has an equal stockpile of gamebreaking bullshit. USA is full of early game BS while the OKW doesn't get its BS until late game. It's just a question of how badly you exploit the faction's shit and how quickly, after a patch, you discover the gaping holes of bullshit Relic leaves. But either way, it's all BS. The only "BS" in vCoH that was gamechanging was the fast m8 vs a bunker.
Still missing the days of vCoH 1.71. It had it's issues, like paks sniping 57s, and the strafe didn't work, but overall, it was probably the most balanced time in CoH history.
OF ruined that. CoH 2 is....balanced in a nasty way. Everyone has an equal stockpile of gamebreaking bullshit. USA is full of early game BS while the OKW doesn't get its BS until late game. It's just a question of how badly you exploit the faction's shit and how quickly, after a patch, you discover the gaping holes of bullshit Relic leaves. But either way, it's all BS. The only "BS" in vCoH that was gamechanging was the fast m8 vs a bunker.
14 Aug 2014, 23:10 PM
#26
Posts: 618
Pershing will be here with Ardennes offensive
Well first of all the Pershing wasn't even used in the Battle of the Bulge and second of all where are you getting that from?
14 Aug 2014, 23:35 PM
#27
Posts: 395
Well first of all the Pershing wasn't even used in the Battle of the Bulge and second of all where are you getting that from?
Intuition. Could be wrong. But they're bringing in 3 new companies. The Battle of the Bulge saw superior German tanks rolling through American tanks. Probably will include some sort of company about leveling the playing field
but just a guess
I bought vCoH on January 3rd, 2007.
Still missing the days of vCoH 1.71. It had it's issues, like paks sniping 57s, and the strafe didn't work, but overall, it was probably the most balanced time in CoH history.
OF ruined that. CoH 2 is....balanced in a nasty way. Everyone has an equal stockpile of gamebreaking bullshit. USA is full of early game BS while the OKW doesn't get its BS until late game. It's just a question of how badly you exploit the faction's shit and how quickly, after a patch, you discover the gaping holes of bullshit Relic leaves. But either way, it's all BS. The only "BS" in vCoH that was gamechanging was the fast m8 vs a bunker.
Still missing the days of vCoH 1.71. It had it's issues, like paks sniping 57s, and the strafe didn't work, but overall, it was probably the most balanced time in CoH history.
OF ruined that. CoH 2 is....balanced in a nasty way. Everyone has an equal stockpile of gamebreaking bullshit. USA is full of early game BS while the OKW doesn't get its BS until late game. It's just a question of how badly you exploit the faction's shit and how quickly, after a patch, you discover the gaping holes of bullshit Relic leaves. But either way, it's all BS. The only "BS" in vCoH that was gamechanging was the fast m8 vs a bunker.
15 Aug 2014, 00:12 AM
#29
Posts: 218
As pretty much a USF-only player, I'm rather content with the tanks we've got now. Jacksons and Shermans can pretty much solve all my ailments.
If anything, a damage sponge like a KV-1 in the form of the Sherman Jumbo would be nice (but that's for another thread).
So, I pretty much don't care if a Pershing is added or not - yay if it is! But I'll still be here if it isn't.
If anything, a damage sponge like a KV-1 in the form of the Sherman Jumbo would be nice (but that's for another thread).
So, I pretty much don't care if a Pershing is added or not - yay if it is! But I'll still be here if it isn't.
15 Aug 2014, 02:04 AM
#30
Posts: 88 | Subs: 1
As a sometimes USF player I don't see the pershing getting used in 1v1 but in team games it can greatly help out an all USF team. I'm just gonna point out that not all commanders are meant for 1v1, some are designed for team games.
15 Aug 2014, 06:19 AM
#31
Posts: 2487 | Subs: 21
I wouldn't mind seeing the Pershing considering the new factions were introduced during the late period of the war. I would also recommend getting the Crocodile Sherman and Calliope introduced as well. And for those saying balance would be messed up, compare the Pershing to the Panther.
16 Aug 2014, 12:15 PM
#32
Posts: 13
Permanently Banned
16 Aug 2014, 12:37 PM
#33
Posts: 2807 | Subs: 6
I'd like to see Jumbo rather than Pershing
16 Aug 2014, 13:02 PM
#34
Posts: 88 | Subs: 1
As long as it's fat and can take a pounding I don't think any USF player would complain.
16 Aug 2014, 13:28 PM
#35
Posts: 175
The game already has enough heavy tanks. This is basically crying for more company of call-ins.
16 Aug 2014, 14:30 PM
#36
Posts: 542
Of course, more stuff is always good and I like fighting against big things even if I don't play Americans. Relic just has to balance them properly.
16 Aug 2014, 15:22 PM
#37
Posts: 88 | Subs: 1
The game already has enough heavy tanks. This is basically crying for more company of call-ins.
And the game will continue to get bigger so as long as it has a specific role that it can fill, why not? Also Relic is already testing ways to weaken call-in strats so I don't see this as a problem.
16 Aug 2014, 18:46 PM
#38
Posts: 598
In team games it is 90:10 for germans. Why?
Better late game tanks, decisions team games.
The percentage of players doesn't prove that one faction is more powerful than the other.
16 Aug 2014, 18:48 PM
#39
Posts: 2053
I want Jumbos. Which gun, i dont really care, since the Jackson will provide all the AT support a meatshield needs, but as long as the Jumbo has a lot of health and can deflect shots like mad, then im happy.
I dont want a Pershing because Pershings arent spammable.
I dont want a Pershing because Pershings arent spammable.
17 Aug 2014, 04:18 AM
#40
Posts: 578
I am more an axis Player but i also like to Play US and soviets and i would love to see the Pershing for the USA. If relic would add him this would be my favourite US commander.
I m also looking Forward for the Calliope, rangers and jumbo.
I m also looking Forward for the Calliope, rangers and jumbo.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
Offline
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.615222.735-2
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.918405.694+2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1236
Board Info
799 users are online:
799 guests
0 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49138
Welcome our newest member, trevinehickman
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, trevinehickman
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM