Played a 3 v 3 game where the build for one opponent was 3 Maxims, 1 AT Gun, 3 Maxims.
Played a 3 v 3 game where the number of T34's rolling in was 5.
Played a 4 v 4 game where the number of Shermas rolling in was 6.
I've played games where I've rolled in 4 Volks.
Aside from the Fuel / map control comments and the "it's not balanced in 2v2 or 3v3 or 4v4", if there was an increasing Pop Cap value added to multiples of units, would this minimize the spamming?
For example, the Popcap formula would look like:
1st unit is X
2nd unit is X x 1.2
3rd unit is X x 1.6
Think about the Pop cap for a second Tiger, second ISU, third Easy 8, or fourth MG?
These values would be adjusted (for conscripts for example) and this does is not prevent it, but makes it less practical and moves towards a more balanced army approach to the game - for all factions, for all Tiers.
This is what keeps me up at night.
Pop Cap as an increasing Value to stop Spam?
24 Jul 2014, 17:21 PM
#1
Posts: 71
ostheer
okw
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
92 | ||
 |
|
|
31 | ||
 |
|
|
21 | ||
 |
|
|
14 | ||
 |
|
|
8 | ||
|
|
|
|
163 | ||
|
|
|
|
14 | ||
 |
|
|
8 | ||
 |
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
|
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.653231.739+13
- 2.839223.790+2
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.592234.717-1
- 5.278108.720+29
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.645.928+5
- 8.922406.694+1
- 9.1122623.643+3
- 10.265138.658+2
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
10
Download
1245
Board Info
815 users are online:
815 guests
0 post in the last 24h
0 post in the last week
28 posts in the last month
0 post in the last week
28 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49427
Welcome our newest member, Baqis73421
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Baqis73421
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM