Posts: 1026
I cant believe the community honestly thinks USF is the weakest faction in 2v2s and above. They absolutely wreck havoc in 2v2s+ in the early games through sheer overwhelming numbers and capping power when used by good players.
Posts: 542
In a 1v1 it's much easier to knock out your opponent early on and capitalize on your victories quickly. 2v2's go longer on average, and very frequently reach late-game. In the late-game, the USF are at a huge disadvantage.
Posts: 1026
![avatar of 1[][]](/uploads/avatar/9394.png?updated=1397144681)
Posts: 172
What arty? 155 mech doctrine I guess. Double USA is incredibly weak lategame though, sans maybe that doctrinal strike (which I don't have).
Posts: 1026
Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2
No, it doesn't. But neither does it take less skill. You need 3 or 4 people to be collectively more skillfull then opposing team. And it does not just mean four better 1v1 players. You often need different skills in 1v1 and in 4v4. Some players love to be a solo hero, others prefer team play.
Posts: 952 | Subs: 1
Maybe get some higher rank before talking to me. Pretty sure you are the real (Herman) troll here
Posts: 84
Snipers for example are good 1v1 but less seen 4v4, this is one reason why long 4v4s turn into tank battles because everything else dies
Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2
Posts: 390
Permanently Banned
1. What's with the obsession with rank? Is only the top player of each faction permitted to give their opinion on balance?
2. Even if you choose to pull rank into this, your stats are a heck of a lot worse than his... so why bring it up?
No offence intended, just curious.
Posts: 503
Maybe get some higher rank before talking to me. Pretty sure you are the real (Herman) troll here
I am not the one who started judging someone by his playercard. That was some other guys. Thou shall not wander why I refer to his playercard
 |
|
|
121 | ||
 |
|
|
66 | ||
 |
|
|
46 | ||
|
|
|
|
21 | ||
 |
|
|
2 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
