As a CoH1 vet, if you still believe its better then CoH2, you should be locked up in asylum.
As a CoH1 vet, I think you're an idiot.
Posts: 393
As a CoH1 vet, if you still believe its better then CoH2, you should be locked up in asylum.
Posts: 1006
Posts: 2238 | Subs: 15
Posts: 260
Posts: 250
CoH1 is the past.
CoH2 is the future.
Posts: 449
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
Posts: 126
Posts: 46
Posts: 2819
Posts: 46
Posts: 368
Posts: 65
Posts: 368
coh1 and coh2 are seperate games with seperate mechanics. Both are enjoyable in their seperate regimes.
Posts: 2115 | Subs: 1
Posts: 368
coh1 and coh2 are seperate games with seperate mechanics. Both are enjoyable in their seperate regimes.
Posts: 1944 | Subs: 2
Does it matter? Play CoH1 if you prefer CoH1, play CoH2 if you prefer CoH2. Play both if you have fun playing both.
As a CoH1 vet, I think you're an idiot.
Posts: 211
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
+1
Its not "nostalgia" if you've played both of them recently, derp. CoH2 has better sniper system and WFA has good doctrines. CoH1 is still a class above in many aspects. Light vehicles don't hard counter each other in half a second, territory defined pop cap, target tables, different units had different upkeep, no instant infantry engine damage abilities, no super tanks, doctrinal tanks didn't cost fuel so you could play your tiered units and still use your doctrine late game instead of deciding one or the other, and support teams were more fluid as someone said earlier. Oh and CoH1 had a much better mine system.
Posts: 420
750 hours logged in CoH1, about 200 so far in CoH2.
... up until just recently they didn't even bother to include a game lobby.
1 | |||||
22 | |||||
12 | |||||
4 | |||||
1 |