Western Front: New Screenshots and pics
Posts: 578
KING TIGER PHOTO:
US Army:
German OKW:
Source:
http://www.polygon.com/2014/5/29/5758212/company-of-heroes-2-the-western-front-armies-preview-release-date-price-relic-interview
On the Foto session of the side yo can enlarge the pics to get a better view.
Posts: 2819
Thanks!
Posts: 2053
Posts: 252
Posts: 4785 | Subs: 3
Posts: 1162
was ist das?
Posts: 1571
Also, I see it now but I missed it earlier:
there is a US 75mm Pak Howitzer !!!!
This means that Airborne may get airdropped artillery (I'm thinking similar to SU-76 barrages)
Posts: 578
was ist das?
Jagdtiger!
the most heaviesy Piece of armor that saw battle in WW2.It has a 128mm Pak 44 gun and 250mm armor.
Posts: 4928
Thanks. And why is the color scheme of the flak truck completely different from the other units? Looks pretty ugly because it is out of place.
One of the reviews said that the Flak Trucks were OKW's version of base buildings. If you'd look closely, you'd realise it's sandbagged in pretty heavily, and the Flak Guns are it's personal defense (since it can't carry the MG bunkers with it). The trucks are kinda like Opels, granting resources but being fragile, so there's a risk / reward factor in actually putting them out there.
Personally I think trucks would have fit the Americans better, since we were the only fully mechanised Army in WW2, where for every platoon of soldiers, we had a truck to carry them. On the other hand, the Russians walked and the Germans used horses.
Posts: 1571
80% of the Soviets and the German divisions were horse drawn (in terms of supplies, artillery, equipment, etc.). All regiments walked from the railhead outside of bicycle mounted battalion or companies (fusilier, which is also in the game). The Germans however, used more motor vehicles in their infantry divisions than the Soviets in order to provide life for essential support services.
US infantry regiments were not fully mobile. The transport could lift a regiment at a time, but not all 3 unless special provisions were allocated.
Posts: 578
Posts: 1162
Posts: 1571
I believe the chassis used by the M8 was the same as the Stuart light tank.
It'll probably be like the US version of the SU-76, but with with even less AT pen ability.
Posts: 1664
Posts: 578
Posts: 4928
Jagdtiger!
the most heaviesy Piece of armor that saw battle in WW2.It has a 128mm Pak 44 gun and 250mm armor.
I have to wonder how they're going to balance such a beast. The Pak 43 and Elefant with their 88m guns already have 440-360 penetration, 320 damage, and 100 range. What's a 128mm gun gonna do? You can't make it any stronger without getting OP!
Posts: 1571
The Jagdtiger is the OKW's version of the ISU except with more penn and more armor? Slower?
Posts: 4928
The ISU-152 was 152mm.
The Jagdtiger is the OKW's version of the ISU except with more penn and more armor? Slower?
The ISU-152 is an Assault Gun mounting a 152mm Howitzer, the Jagdtiger is a Tank Destroyer mounting a 128mm Anti-Tank Gun.
Besides the ISU-152 isn't exactly a key picture of balance at the moment...
Posts: 2053
Posts: 1571
I think it is likely that the Jagdtiger would be a merging of the Elefant and the ISU-152. It would probably be even slower than these two vehicles, as well.
The ISU-152 is an Assault Gun mounting a 152mm Howitzer, the Jagdtiger is a Tank Destroyer mounting a 128mm Anti-Tank Gun.
Besides the ISU-152 isn't exactly a key picture of balance at the moment...
Livestreams
595 | |||||
10 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.829222.789+35
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.587233.716+3
- 4.1095612.641+19
- 5.882398.689+4
- 6.280162.633+8
- 7.997646.607+1
- 8.379114.769+1
- 9.300113.726-1
- 10.717439.620+1
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
capiqua
3 posts in the last week
23 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, sunwinctcom
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM