Login

russian armor

Sandbox should be switched back to Pio & Engi

Sandbox should be switched back to Pio & Engi
Option Distribution Votes
47%
35%
18%
Total votes: 17
Vote VOTE! Vote ABSTAIN
18 May 2014, 12:57 PM
#1
avatar of Porygon

Posts: 2779

Now Cons are short/mid range mobile unit, assume in far range, Grens in green cover can still able to win Cons in sandbag cover, isn't it ridiculous?

In some maps that is not enough green cover, why should it only favoring Soviet which only able to build homemade green cover?


Opps it should be Sandbag, but I can't edit :(
18 May 2014, 13:00 PM
#2
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

Pick a doctrine with trenches or get unupgraded bunker?
And yes, trench hp should be buffed.
18 May 2014, 13:27 PM
#3
avatar of Burts

Posts: 1702

If cons lose then sandbags, i want DP for conscripts.



It's called assymetrical balance desing.

Cons get oorah, sandbags and grens get LMG 42 and free grenades and fausts (no fuel cost)

I'd trade LMG 42 for oorah and sandbags any day.
18 May 2014, 14:05 PM
#4
avatar of Porygon

Posts: 2779

Wow, I didn't suggest Soviet lose sandbag but leave it back to Engi, calm the hell down.
18 May 2014, 14:06 PM
#5
avatar of Puppetmaster
Patrion 310

Posts: 871

So I take it you would also be in favour of only Pio's being able to build bunkers?
18 May 2014, 14:07 PM
#6
avatar of Katitof

Posts: 17914 | Subs: 8

jump backJump back to quoted post18 May 2014, 14:05 PMPorygon
Wow, I didn't suggest Soviet lose sandbag but leave it back to Engi, calm the hell down.


He does have a point thou.

Why do you believe exclusive soviet abilities should be shared, but exclusive german ones should stay germans?

Why didn't you suggest taking away bunkers from grens and giving CEs MG nests as well?
18 May 2014, 14:11 PM
#7
avatar of Porygon

Posts: 2779

So I take it you would also be in favour of only Pio's being able to build bunkers?


Yeah, so should Soviet get bunker, why not?
I mean, those are totally basic stuff shouldn't bind to one faction.

This is crazy but I think Relic is crazy enough to lock sandbag to OKW in the western front.
18 May 2014, 14:35 PM
#8
avatar of Kronosaur0s

Posts: 1701

Trench? lolotov
18 May 2014, 16:37 PM
#9
avatar of Omega_Warrior

Posts: 2561

jump backJump back to quoted post18 May 2014, 14:11 PMPorygon


Yeah, so should Soviet get bunker, why not?
I mean, those are totally basic stuff shouldn't bind to one faction.

This is crazy but I think Relic is crazy enough to lock sandbag to OKW in the western front.
But they aren't basic stuff to COH2. COH1 was different but all the easily placed defenses made things way too campy.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

1001 users are online: 1001 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49082
Welcome our newest member, 23winlocker
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM