Would it improve the game to make it so MGs, mortars, AT guns, snipers and units in HTs couldn't cap?
That way any army which made heavy use of support units would suffer some drawbacks.
We have a precedent in coh1 where no army had a support weapon that could fire while capping.
I think it could change the early-game meta for the betta. Thoughts?
Remove capping ability from all support weapons?
18 May 2014, 00:21 AM
#1
Posts: 987
Let's keep it constructive
18 May 2014, 00:27 AM
#2
Posts: 155
Looks like im snailworm
18 May 2014, 00:31 AM
#3
Posts: 987
Heh, sorry for the silly vote names, I'm the real snailworm for phrasing it that way 
But please say why you think it wouldn't improve the game.
But please say why you think it wouldn't improve the game. Let's keep it constructive
18 May 2014, 00:43 AM
#4
Posts: 66
too extreme but they should cap territories at a lower speed
18 May 2014, 00:51 AM
#5
5 
Posts: 1157 | Subs: 2
I would be in favor of reducing the cap speed to half like the old ostruppen. This would make toxic strats like maxim spam less viable once mid game rolls around, without totally gimping the maxim as a support unit.
18 May 2014, 01:04 AM
#6
Posts: 308
Let them cap but reduce speed
18 May 2014, 01:07 AM
#7
Posts: 987
Agreed, reduced speed is a good option too. Thx for the constructive replies!
Let's keep it constructive
18 May 2014, 02:12 AM
#8
Posts: 3293
i obstained to wording in pole (creating bias) but id be snailworm. now tbh id be all for reduced cap rate as them capping at the same rate as infantry is kinda odd.
i like that change tbh capping cirlces bring alot to the game and capping points. and i like that support teams can cap its a matter of do they cap to fast maybe its better this way or maybe reduceing there cap rate would be better.
(creating bias) but id be snailworm. now tbh id be all for reduced cap rate as them capping at the same rate as infantry is kinda odd. i like that change tbh capping cirlces bring alot to the game and capping points. and i like that support teams can cap its a matter of do they cap to fast maybe its better this way or maybe reduceing there cap rate would be better.
Failure is always an option. 
It's a happy massacre?! (yes, yes it is!)
Caffeine illegal for WiFi's to ingest in 48 states, 2 colonies, and 1 providences. 
To make most awesome thing in universe combine Bears and Nicholas Cage! 
and remember kids, we didn't start the flame-war!
18 May 2014, 02:51 AM
#9
Posts: 168
1 option could also be a cap mode like with soviet tanks at vet 1
When activated the unit would be unable to setup the weapon
When activated the unit would be unable to setup the weapon
18 May 2014, 03:14 AM
#10
Posts: 598
I just played vCoH again and I just realized much better it was that mgs can't cap points. It makes infantry feel so much more important.
18 May 2014, 03:52 AM
#11
Posts: 1355
I just played vCoH again and I just realized much better it was that mgs can't cap points. It makes infantry feel so much more important.
Sorry to spoil it for you but MGs can also cap in vCOH.
18 May 2014, 04:09 AM
#12
Posts: 598
yes, but they can't cap and fire at the same time.
18 May 2014, 04:48 AM
#13
Posts: 783 | Subs: 3
You are already sacrificing AT-nades or panzerfaust by using a weapons team, and you are risking giving equipment to your enemy. No point in nerfing weapons teams.
That idiot thought he won. In fact, he was wrong. Completely mistaken.No M3 he what things are not，just one moron.
The German oil scarcity, rare tanks cannot fight the Allied torrent. Kill the house to kill the German oil.
Every time lose may feel bad. Probably not the word lose your subconscious. Maybe I win you Not for the first time Maybe you you should go to recall,
The German oil scarcity, rare tanks cannot fight the Allied torrent. Kill the house to kill the German oil.
Every time lose may feel bad. Probably not the word lose your subconscious. Maybe I win you Not for the first time Maybe you you should go to recall,
18 May 2014, 05:11 AM
#14
![avatar of 1[][]](/uploads/avatar/9394.png?updated=1397144681)
Posts: 172
nerf weapons teams
18 May 2014, 05:44 AM
#15
Posts: 987
You are already sacrificing AT-nades or panzerfaust by using a weapons team, and you are risking giving equipment to your enemy. No point in nerfing weapons teams.
What you're saying is true and should be taken into account.
Would it not mean that if they had their capping removed that both sides would have to make more careful strategic decisions and maybe build more infantry? This would open the games up a bit, make it all more mobile.
Here's an ImperialDane shoutcast (love his shoutcasts
) where the soviet player at 6 minutes has 6 Maxims and an AT gun.https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AnKsKPJM7K4
It's one of the dullest early games to watch
Let's keep it constructive
18 May 2014, 05:53 AM
#16
Posts: 1702
hey guys! Lets make combined arms even more hard to use!
Combined arms in this game is already not as rewarding as it should be. Like spamming grens/cons/maxims whatever is already easy enough. Why make combined arms even more hard to pull off?
Combined arms in this game is already not as rewarding as it should be. Like spamming grens/cons/maxims whatever is already easy enough. Why make combined arms even more hard to pull off?
18 May 2014, 06:08 AM
#17
Posts: 578
Snailworms FTW!
18 May 2014, 06:08 AM
#18
Posts: 60
Dislike.
18 May 2014, 06:38 AM
#19
4 
Posts: 813 | Subs: 1
Very biased poll... But, no. Keep them the way they are. Yes some ppl spam maxims and cap, but I find them to be quite few. Let's keep the game open to options, let's not completely remove strats because you don't like them.
18 May 2014, 06:47 AM
#20
Posts: 2779
hey guys! Lets make combined arms even more hard to use!
Combined arms in this game is already not as rewarding as it should be. Like spamming grens/cons/maxims whatever is already easy enough. Why make combined arms even more hard to pull off?
Yes, almost 100% of 2v2 Soviet is one purely consspam and one purely maxim spam, this shit surely a combined arms hur?
Before in vCOH, two US players did the same thing, but required much more skills and easier to breakthrough than the current maxim shit here now. Rifles has very high upkeep and 30 cal can be easily countered by bike snipers, now cons and maxim almost have no upkeep and the game itself encourage spam.
3 users are browsing this thread:
3 guests
Livestreams
 |
|
|
86 | ||
 |
|
|
15 | ||
|
|
|
|
9 | ||
|
|
|
|
8 | ||
 |
|
|
160 | ||
|
|
|
|
26 | ||
 |
|
|
14 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
3 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.829222.789+35
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.483190.718-1
- 4.587233.716+3
- 5.1095612.641+19
- 6.894399.691+4
- 7.280162.633+8
- 8.1004649.607+5
- 9.304113.729+4
- 10.379114.769+1
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1006
Board Info
940 users are online:
940 guests
1 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
26 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
26 posts in the last month
Registered members: 48787
Welcome our newest member, Morisseau11
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Morisseau11
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM