Login

russian armor

Two new free Commanders today!

PAGES (8)down
24 Apr 2014, 16:38 PM
#41
avatar of BeltFedWombat
Patrion 14

Posts: 951

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Apr 2014, 15:13 PMAffe

I want to have a german commander that can build T-34 and IS-2!


Over-entitled dick.
24 Apr 2014, 16:39 PM
#42
avatar of Smirnoff
Patrion 14

Posts: 111

The allied supply drop varies but the axis one does not?


Soviets can drop their stuff where they want. That means you can drop your stuff next to your base. But Axis have to drop it at a fuel or ammunition point (correct me if i´m wrong). Besides the plane overflies the point frequently and the soviets know where the supplies drops.
24 Apr 2014, 16:41 PM
#43
avatar of Omega_Warrior

Posts: 2561

So I tried out the soviet one:

Supply drops come from enemies base, using it while they have AA is a bad idea.

Shermans seem to hit as hard as a 76 but has a faster rate of fire. It's role is bit like a T34/85 with less pen and more DPS.

Guards in the halftrack dont have PTRS. I think I counted 3 Phsh and the rest have rifles. A good anti infantry light vehicle calll in and the two units work well when seperated so you can always throw on an upgrade on the M5.

Overall it a good vehicle based doctrine, good with T4 strategys. I give it a 9/10.

24 Apr 2014, 16:45 PM
#44
avatar of BIG RON
Donator 11

Posts: 172

So I tried out the soviet one:

Supply drops come from enemies base, using it while they have AA is a bad idea.

Shermans seem to hit as hard as a 76 but has a faster rate of fire. It's role is bit like a T34/85 with less pen and more DPS.

Guards in the halftrack dont have PTRS. I think I counted 3 Phsh and the rest have rifles. A good anti infantry light vehicle calll in and the two units work well when seperated so you can always throw on an upgrade on the M5.

Overall it a good vehicle based doctrine, good with T4 strategys. I give it a 9/10.



Nice feedback Omega, I can't wait to get home and try it! :)
24 Apr 2014, 16:47 PM
#45
avatar of 89456132

Posts: 211

Thanks Smirnoff for the info.

My favourite part of new units are the unheard voice lines.
24 Apr 2014, 16:55 PM
#46
avatar of van Voort
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2

Mobile Defence Commander

0CP Counterattack

This is presumably similar to the version in the 1941 TOW Rostov scenario*


2CP Smoke

Nice


3CP Ostruppen

Meh

6CP Puma

We'll see what it is like

8CP Command Tank



This looks nice, and it is interesting to see that this a doctine where people will probably skip T3 and go straight for T4



*Cue incoherent nerd rage when this gets realised

"I don't want more paid DLC"

"Ok have some free DLC"

"This DLC looks like something that already exists, I am insulted"
24 Apr 2014, 16:58 PM
#47
avatar of BeltFedWombat
Patrion 14

Posts: 951

Just tried the Puma... solid at infantry harassment / kiting and with half-decent Anti Armour. I predict Puma spam... they are very cheap.
24 Apr 2014, 17:00 PM
#48
avatar of Lümmel
Patrion 14

Posts: 542 | Subs: 1

Imo Puma comes way too late from what i experienced in 3 4v4 games so far.
By the time Puma comes, there are already multiple P4 from my mates.

Doesn't say a lot about 1v1 tho.
24 Apr 2014, 17:00 PM
#49
avatar of Baionetto

Posts: 90

thx for the new commanders relic :)
24 Apr 2014, 17:08 PM
#50
avatar of Speculator

Posts: 157

M5 Assault Group with PPSH Guards. I guess pqumsieh really wanted the Pio spam counter of clown car PPSHs to be a legit tactic :P.
24 Apr 2014, 17:29 PM
#51
avatar of Zupadupadude

Posts: 618

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Apr 2014, 15:20 PMAffe
I just complain that the soviets still missing there own Units like KV-85, ISU-122, SU-122 and SU-100 and while all this is still missing we get now american Equipment that already come in june with the USA faction.

WHY MUST IT BE THE SHERMAN?
WHY NOT SU-100 ISU-122 OR KV-85?
WHY?


Because getting new units into the game (with completely new models and so forth) costs a lot of money. And since the Russians used the M4A2 Sherman (M4C as the Russians designated it) then why not?
24 Apr 2014, 17:30 PM
#52
avatar of Aerohank

Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Apr 2014, 17:00 PMLümmel
Imo Puma comes way too late from what i experienced in 3 4v4 games so far.
By the time Puma comes, there are already multiple P4 from my mates.

Doesn't say a lot about 1v1 tho.


4v4 does not count. You can get a panther as your 5th unit in that game mode.
24 Apr 2014, 17:39 PM
#53
avatar of Affe

Posts: 578



Because getting new units into the game (with completely new models and so forth) costs a lot of money. And since the Russians used the M4A2 Sherman (M4C as the Russians designated it) then why not?

New models?
SU-100 is a SU-85 with a longer gun.
KV-85 is a KV-1 with the turret of the T-34/85.
there is nothing new.
24 Apr 2014, 17:46 PM
#54
avatar of Kronosaur0s

Posts: 1701

^Typical whining dude that does not thank Relic for free content and new and interesting units.

Thanks Relic for this :)
24 Apr 2014, 17:50 PM
#55
avatar of nigo
Senior Editor Badge

Posts: 2238 | Subs: 15

24 Apr 2014, 18:00 PM
#56
avatar of van Voort
Honorary Member Badge

Posts: 3552 | Subs: 2

Lend Lease

2CP Dishka

Which is now buffed and in a non sucky commander

4CP Allied Supply Drop

Looks like trade 100 Muni for about 20-40 fuel

5CP Conscript Repair
Meh

5CP Guards Assault Group

Guards without PTRS and with PPSH in an M5, and these cannot get the LMG either
Handy to enable you to skip T3, and proabably better than the German Mech Groups

8CP Sherman

Hard to say what is this and what is the changes to tank war, but it seems fast and mobile


This commander looks like it will complement T1 and T4 well, with the Dishka enabling you to hold ground and T4 for the Su-85 that will be able to handle heavy armour
24 Apr 2014, 19:24 PM
#57
avatar of The amazing Chandler

Posts: 1355

M5 Assault Group with PPSH Guards. I guess pqumsieh really wanted the Pio spam counter of clown car PPSHs to be a legit tactic :P.


:rofl: Good one!!!
Btw i like this unit!
24 Apr 2014, 19:24 PM
#58
avatar of Zupadupadude

Posts: 618

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Apr 2014, 17:39 PMAffe

New models?
SU-100 is a SU-85 with a longer gun.
KV-85 is a KV-1 with the turret of the T-34/85.
there is nothing new.


Who honestly gives a shite, it's free. Be grateful for once.
24 Apr 2014, 19:35 PM
#59
avatar of Speculator

Posts: 157

Curious, the Sherman the Puma are the first units not to get any bulletins after their release.
24 Apr 2014, 20:23 PM
#60
avatar of korgoth

Posts: 170

jump backJump back to quoted post24 Apr 2014, 15:20 PMAffe
I just complain that the soviets still missing there own Units like KV-85, ISU-122, SU-122 and SU-100 and while all this is still missing we get now american Equipment that already come in june with the USA faction.

WHY MUST IT BE THE SHERMAN?
WHY NOT SU-100 ISU-122 OR KV-85?
WHY?


Damn u guys are never happy... cant u just appreciate good and free content?
PAGES (8)down
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

698 users are online: 698 guests
1 post in the last 24h
7 posts in the last week
39 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49062
Welcome our newest member, Mclatc16
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM