Login

russian armor

Standalone America + Germany DLC

PAGES (9)down
28 Mar 2014, 15:57 PM
#41
avatar of MadeMan

Posts: 304

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Mar 2014, 15:46 PMBurts


go play starcraft II, this is a WW2 rts for a reason. If they really enable sovs+ US matches in one game i will quit the game.
Retarded.

go play with miniatures or read a history book, this is a competitive rts for a reason. If they really don't enable sovs+US matches i will quit the game.
Retarded.

See? There are two sides to the argument. I'm not really calling you retarded btw, just mirroring your statement. I can appreciate that it's a WW2 game, and I would want the single player to be accurate, but if you want CoH to be regarded as a true competitive game, then limiting options for matches seems counter-intuitive. I dunno, I find it fun either way but this is the first community for a competitive game I've ever seen want to limit options to the player to benefit 'historical realism'.
It's like if I was playing King of Fighters and demanded SNK not allow Terry to fight Andy because they are brothers in the storyline and it wouldn't make sense. Or my opponent can't pick the same character as me because it wouldn't work like that in real life.
28 Mar 2014, 15:57 PM
#42
avatar of AvNY

Posts: 862

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Mar 2014, 15:56 PMBurts


Well thats what i will apparently be doing. Or just doing 1v1 as sovs only. That way there is no americans. That might still work.


Everyone is free to find their own way to enjoy the game.
28 Mar 2014, 15:57 PM
#43
avatar of buckers

Posts: 230

german faction was called 'obercommand west' if anyone was wondering.

i guess americans will just be that or USA
28 Mar 2014, 15:59 PM
#44
avatar of Senseo1990

Posts: 317

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Mar 2014, 15:54 PMQubix


MoW ? Wargame ? why aren't you playing these kind of games when realism is so important to you ?
o_O


Those games are not more authentic than US+Sov in one team.
28 Mar 2014, 16:00 PM
#45
avatar of Senseo1990

Posts: 317

Great news!
Did they say anything about the new factions - will they implement the same commandersystem as for soviets and ostheer?


They did say that the german faction is very unique in their new ressource system and how their tiers work and even how they capture territory ... now...thats gotta be an interesting faction to say the least :D
28 Mar 2014, 16:00 PM
#46
avatar of utmost
Patrion 14

Posts: 182

link in shout box:)
28 Mar 2014, 16:01 PM
#47
avatar of jeesuspietari

Posts: 168

Yes yes historical accuracy is one of the actually important aspects in a competitive multiplayer environment
28 Mar 2014, 16:02 PM
#48
avatar of Burts

Posts: 1702

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Mar 2014, 15:57 PMMadeMan

go play with miniatures or read a history book, this is a competitive rts for a reason. If they really don't enable sovs+US matches i will quit the game.
Retarded.

See? There are two sides to the argument. I'm not really calling you retarded btw, just mirroring your statement. I can appreciate that it's a WW2 game, and I would want the single player to be accurate, but if you want CoH to be regarded as a true competitive game, then limiting options for matches seems counter-intuitive. I dunno, I find it fun either way but this is the first community for a competitive game I've ever seen want to limit options to the player to benefit 'historical realism'.
It's like if I was playing King of Fighters and demanded SNK not allow Terry to fight Andy because they are brothers in the storyline and it wouldn't make sense. Or my opponent can't pick the same character as me because it wouldn't work like that in real life.


this is a competitive RTS? really? Well if its a competitive rts it is the WORST competitive rts of all time.

If i want to play a competitive RTS i buy starcraft.
28 Mar 2014, 16:02 PM
#49
avatar of Shazz

Posts: 194



They did say that the german faction is very unique in their new ressource system and how their tiers work and even how they capture territory ... now...thats gotta be an interesting faction to say the least :D


That reads dangerously like how Brits were introduced to vCoH. ;)

Otherwise looks exciting!
28 Mar 2014, 16:06 PM
#50
avatar of HappyPhace

Posts: 309

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Mar 2014, 15:46 PMBurts


go play starcraft II, this is a WW2 rts for a reason. If they really enable sovs+ US matches in one game i will quit the game.
Retarded.


Please do. This is a video game, not a history lesson.
28 Mar 2014, 16:08 PM
#51
avatar of herr anfsim

Posts: 247

Where is Katitof?
28 Mar 2014, 16:11 PM
#52
avatar of Senseo1990

Posts: 317

Where is Katitof?


You wont see him for a while :D

20% of the joy about the announcement for me comes from the fact that Katitof was wrong all along :D
28 Mar 2014, 16:13 PM
#53
avatar of Aerohank

Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Mar 2014, 15:57 PMMadeMan

go play with miniatures or read a history book, this is a competitive rts for a reason. If they really don't enable sovs+US matches i will quit the game.
Retarded.


This is not a competitive RTS by any stretch of the imagination.
28 Mar 2014, 16:14 PM
#54
avatar of MorgolKing

Posts: 148

Me too. I want an option in automatch to not have American and Soviet armies mixed. That would take me out of the game as too jarring.

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Mar 2014, 15:54 PMBurts


I have no problem 2 german armies. I have no problem about the expansion pack. I have no problem the new german army + old one playing together. I have a problem sovs+ US playing together.

I also have a problem with US on eastern front maps.
28 Mar 2014, 16:14 PM
#55
avatar of Burts

Posts: 1702



Please do. This is a video game, not a history lesson.



Yeah, guess the new "crowd" just likes bullshit like war thunder ,WoT, and soon to be CoH2.
Well , i still have my hopes up for IL-2 BOS, atleast thats not going to be an ahistorical shitfest. I bet in 70 years we will have WW2 RTS games with 19th century weapons.

It is just sad seeing one of my favourite RTS get turned into complete dog crap.
28 Mar 2014, 16:16 PM
#56
avatar of PingPing

Posts: 329

Ah - so now we know why they broke COH1.....
28 Mar 2014, 16:18 PM
#57
avatar of sultan36z

Posts: 45

This is very great news, i dont mind this mix, it would be fun, and remeber people, THIS IS A VIDEOGAME! not an History Class
28 Mar 2014, 16:22 PM
#58
avatar of Napalm

Posts: 1595 | Subs: 2

It would be worth while to pursue this if we want to support Relic financially.
28 Mar 2014, 16:23 PM
#59
avatar of tuvok
Benefactor 115

Posts: 786

this is not a problem if the new maps make usa spawn on their left, germans in the middle and soviets on the right :p
28 Mar 2014, 16:24 PM
#60
avatar of pigsoup
Patrion 14

Posts: 4301 | Subs: 2

jump backJump back to quoted post28 Mar 2014, 16:02 PMBurts


this is a competitive RTS? really? Well if its a competitive rts it is the WORST competitive rts of all time.

If i want to play a competitive RTS i buy starcraft.


they should add 'east', 'west', or both option for sure
PAGES (9)down
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Livestreams

unknown 62
unknown 35
United States 2

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

778 users are online: 1 member and 777 guests
litianyu0707
0 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49143
Welcome our newest member, Spdcderry
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM