Why is IS2 so godly, and tiger is so shitty?
Posts: 2779
Tiger should be fearsome, but now it's performance is just like a fatter overpriced panzer 4, without decent penetration and splash damage, slow firing and slow maneuvering. Stalin infantry can even dance in front of it.
IS2 can now one shot squad wipe, one shot killing PAK, that's not reasonable. Even the Tiger Ace cannot do that.
Posts: 157
IS-2 vs Tiger is pretty evenly matched from my experience, with who has better tank micro being the victor (IE stuttering your tank for each shot)with a bit of RNG.
If you're looking to 1 shot Russian squads go for the sturmpanzer IV, thing is awesome.
Posts: 2779
Well, for starters the IS-2 has a 122mm gun with HE rounds, while the tiger has an 88mm gun with HE rounds (I believe). That explains the squad wipe ability of the IS-2. I'm not totally familiar with the penetration tables but I think the the Tiger should penetrate every tank the Russians have nearly 100% of the time aside from the front armor on the IS-2.
IS-2 vs Tiger is pretty evenly matched from my experience, with who has better tank micro being the victor (IE stuttering your tank for each shot)with a bit of RNG.
If you're looking to 1 shot Russian squads go for the sturmpanzer IV, thing is awesome.
First, I just watched a shoutcast from propagandacast, showing 2 Tigers facing a single IS2, need to run away.
Second, who cares reality.
Third, brumbar Strumpanzer IV never do squad wipe, their anti infantry ability is even worse than Ostwind.
Posts: 308
Posts: 308
First, I just watched a shoutcast from propagandacast, showing 2 Tigers facing a single IS2, need to run away.
Second, who cares reality.
Third, brumbar Strumpanzer IV never do squad wipe, their anti infantry ability is even worse than Ostwind.
Brummbar is awful.
Posts: 4928
Posts: 589
Posts: 4928
Posts: 366
Tiger vs Is-2 ... tiger will win all times.
try to get tiger to vet 2 if you can.. than the +10 range and massive accuracy buff kicks in..watch the tiger shred everything.
tip : in team games if one mate is elite troops.. he can vet the tiger upon spawn
Posts: 344
IMHO, a well-microed Panther is worth just as much, if not more, than a Tiger, plus it leaves doctrine choices open (I felt the same in vCoH, except for the part where a Tiger is badass as all hell and had that "oh s**t" factor).
Posts: 1003
Posts: 337
Posts: 202
AiR's Tiger Armee here vs. several IS-2s, note the vet 3 IS-2 was nearly helpless 1vs1 with a unvetteed and damaged tiger iirc. http://www.coh2.org/replays/12355/heavy-tank-battle-of-the-year-mvgame
Posts: 2779
This thread is so fail. Everyone knows the tiger owns the Is-2 1vs1...other circumstances not withstanding. The Is-2 is godly as an all purpose tank, destroying infnatry so hard, but is usually easily countered by german heavies. If anything, I think the IS-2 needs a buff vs. the big cats headon.
AiR's Tiger Armee here vs. several IS-2s, note the vet 3 IS-2 was nearly helpless 1vs1 with a unvetteed and damaged tiger iirc. http://www.coh2.org/replays/12355/heavy-tank-battle-of-the-year-mvgame
R
N
G
Posts: 249
Posts: 2807 | Subs: 6
Tiger is full shitty tank, when it hits the field i don't fell it's a game changer
And sturmpanzer can also wipe squad if cons are close to each other, for example in some hole with yellow cover
Posts: 217
PZG shrecks can only get a shot or two in and after that you risk losing your shreck squad to the enemey and thats almost gg that late in the game.
What I like to do is go T4 if I feel the IS 2 is coming. Panthers do really well against IS2s because you can do a lot of damage faster and you are also able to flank the Russian beast. I almost never kill an IS2 in one battle, but because you can repair your Panther relativly faster you can always put pressure on that IS2.
In the best case scenario you also have Tactical smoke to protect your Panthers.
It can be done with paks, stugs (with Vet1 stun ability) and shrecks, but that takes more micro and I dont really like Pak guns, too easy to decrew, especially with shocks on the field... or KV8 lol
Posts: 688
I guess those complaining about he Brumm are doing so because they use it for anti-tank purposes...
Posts: 202
The Brummbar definately does not need to do more damage.
I guess those complaining about he Brumm are doing so because they use it for anti-tank purposes...
LuL. Brummbar is so fail if the enemy has any clue what "micro" means....turretless inf killer so easy to avoid, get a crit on it and it's near useless, and it doesn't instagib or wipe half of a squad near as much as practically every peice of russian armour.
Posts: 1130
@Volsky
I agree panthers are awesome AT tanks but current meta doesn't support them in 1 vs 1 battles. indeed its practical suicide ot go tier 4 these days.
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1099614.642-1
- 5.280162.633+8
- 6.305114.728+1
- 7.916405.693-2
- 8.271108.715+22
- 9.721440.621+3
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
6 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, starkindustries
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM