The doctrine of the Red Army paratroops.
7 Oct 2014, 12:38 PM
#41
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
It's an outline of Commander. Paratroopers and gun can deliver the A-7 Glider (could carry seven paratroopers or a gun with ammunition and crew of four people). Possible to change CP for better balance.
7 Oct 2014, 13:05 PM
#42
Posts: 8
Good idea guys but soviet paras should be long awaited long range infantry squad armed with SVT and DP and can be upgraded with PPS for CQB , with some ability to increase accuracy like us paras and ostheer stroops.
7 Oct 2014, 13:26 PM
#43
Posts: 862
There are already FG42s.... Fallschirmjaegars.
Another piece of German fantasy kit Relic pulled out of the historical dustbin.
The FG42 was quite unreliable and mechanically defficient in its first incarnation and it is unclear how many of the 2nd (and 3rd) were produced but it was in the low thousands and was not without mechanical issues itself.
The Russians had almost 100,000 BARs, maybe they should be an upgrade package for Cons or Shocks in the Lend Lease commander? (The original WWI m1918 production was given to the soviets, there were about 100,000. The m1918A2 was the one mass produced for the US in WWII.)
8 Oct 2014, 11:33 AM
#44
Posts: 923
Good idea guys but soviet paras should be long awaited long range infantry squad armed with SVT and DP and can be upgraded with PPS for CQB , with some ability to increase accuracy like us paras and ostheer stroops.
This! + maybe some better AT ability than is currently availible?
OffTopic: Would you stop with the historical discussions? As long as they fill the spirit of things no need for details.
Disclaimer: Posts made while drunk should not count against this poster.
8 Oct 2014, 18:31 PM
#45
Posts: 56
OffTopic: Would you stop with the historical discussions? As long as they fill the spirit of things no need for details.
This game is based on history. Even more, in some things Relic tries actually to follow it, like bringing fuel and munition starved OKW faction in general
(yeah, plenty of stuff is broken beyond normal, but WWII is highly controversial)
Still, if you design something based on history, you should take history into account.
As for game purpose. Isn't it strange to combine DP with short-ranged SVT?
8 Oct 2014, 18:59 PM
#46
Posts: 8
This game is based on history. Even more, in some things Relic tries actually to follow it, like bringing fuel and munition starved OKW faction in general
(yeah, plenty of stuff is broken beyond normal, but WWII is highly controversial)
Still, if you design something based on history, you should take history into account.
As for game purpose. Isn't it strange to combine DP with short-ranged SVT?
SVT should have long range profile , about historical accuracy , say it to mass produced ostwinds , sturmtigers and more and more.
8 Oct 2014, 19:18 PM
#47
Posts: 1701
Keep dreaming guys 
Blaue Division - The best corp
BPX - Black Phoenix, Clan leader.
BPX - Black Phoenix, Clan leader.
9 Oct 2014, 10:40 AM
#48
Posts: 2
@Historical Discussion - I think that it has a place here; but I don't personally believe that it should be the end all be all.
We have the Sturmtiger as a non-doctrinal unit to begin with, that should stomp out any "This shouldn't be here because it isn't realistic/historically accurate" arguments to begin with.
This doctrine is quite interesting to me, I must say I like it. I'd certainly love to see another Soviet doctrine that genuinely changes their overall playstyle and not one that simply supplements it.
We have the Sturmtiger as a non-doctrinal unit to begin with, that should stomp out any "This shouldn't be here because it isn't realistic/historically accurate" arguments to begin with.
This doctrine is quite interesting to me, I must say I like it. I'd certainly love to see another Soviet doctrine that genuinely changes their overall playstyle and not one that simply supplements it.
9 Oct 2014, 10:46 AM
#49
Posts: 923
@Historical Discussion - I think that it has a place here; but I don't personally believe that it should be the end all be all.
We have the Sturmtiger as a non-doctrinal unit to begin with, that should stomp out any "This shouldn't be here because it isn't realistic/historically accurate" arguments to begin with.
This doctrine is quite interesting to me, I must say I like it. I'd certainly love to see another Soviet doctrine that genuinely changes their overall playstyle and not one that simply supplements it.
Exactly. As long as it is kinda inline with the spirit of things the need for detailed discussions about amount of combat jumps is irrelevant. Don't think US paras dropped single squads on pin-point locations of active battlefields either.
Disclaimer: Posts made while drunk should not count against this poster.
9 Oct 2014, 13:19 PM
#50
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
Exactly. As long as it is kinda inline with the spirit of things the need for detailed discussions about amount of combat jumps is irrelevant. Don't think US paras dropped single squads on pin-point locations of active battlefields either.
So guys, can you have more suggestions, comments or questions about this commander?
9 Oct 2014, 14:06 PM
#51
Posts: 923
Sorry sorry, yeah sure.
I think the original idea of commander abilites are trying to be a no-tier commander until late game, rather then complementing the regular Soviet army.
I would rather see abit more airstrikes, maybe as a supply drop than the light tank and AT-gun.
Another thing that would be cool is to bring back the old gliders from commandos. Like a FHQ but placeable in an open spot. The danger of objects that US paras suffer from would also mean bullshit landings in cities would probably not take place.
This thing would make the commander: Offensive by means of strong infantry, (preferably VDV should be long-range since the sovs lack in that area.) and call in FHQ, providing a and a mobile lategame force infantry force. But it is lacking in lategame tanks and would, thanks to several call-ins and infantry focus, be a muniheavy commander.
I think the original idea of commander abilites are trying to be a no-tier commander until late game, rather then complementing the regular Soviet army.
I would rather see abit more airstrikes, maybe as a supply drop than the light tank and AT-gun.
Another thing that would be cool is to bring back the old gliders from commandos. Like a FHQ but placeable in an open spot. The danger of objects that US paras suffer from would also mean bullshit landings in cities would probably not take place.
This thing would make the commander: Offensive by means of strong infantry, (preferably VDV should be long-range since the sovs lack in that area.) and call in FHQ, providing a and a mobile lategame force infantry force. But it is lacking in lategame tanks and would, thanks to several call-ins and infantry focus, be a muniheavy commander.
Disclaimer: Posts made while drunk should not count against this poster.
9 Oct 2014, 14:41 PM
#52
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
I invented this doctrine with friends long before the Western Front.
With the current balance of the USSR's hard to play without of calling tanks. Can be replaced T-60 double T-34-85?
With the current balance of the USSR's hard to play without of calling tanks. Can be replaced T-60 double T-34-85?
10 Oct 2014, 09:19 AM
#53
Posts: 923
I invented this doctrine with friends long before the Western Front.
With the current balance of the USSR's hard to play without of calling tanks. Can be replaced T-60 double T-34-85?
I don't know. Plenty of doctrines have no late game call ins. This could be the offset for good early game pushing. The fixing of this theoretical commanders late game abilites lies in the general overlook of the Soviet faction. Adding T-34s don't seem to fit the commander.
Also Early game commanders should not be looked down upon in teamgames. It just makes a shift of who among your own team is leading the battle.
Disclaimer: Posts made while drunk should not count against this poster.
10 Oct 2014, 16:04 PM
#54
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
Some photos of Soviet paratroopers.
Paratroopers wore special parachute jacket and pants with large pockets.
In the winter, wear heat-insulated sheepskin outfit with big fur collars - brown, protective or dark blue.
Over the form dressed white or summer camouflage suit.
Paratroopers wore special parachute jacket and pants with large pockets.
In the winter, wear heat-insulated sheepskin outfit with big fur collars - brown, protective or dark blue.
Over the form dressed white or summer camouflage suit.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
SHOUT IT OUT!
SupremeStefan: https://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=3457737797
Last Friday, 12:42 PM
Last Friday, 12:42 PM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone not dead yet. when that happens the font will switch to Papyrus 
Last Wednesday, 00:16 AM
Last Wednesday, 00:16 AM
aerafield: yeah I already prepared my "Can't believe there's comic mode for the 10 daily visitors even on this April 1st" 
Last Tuesday, 20:29 PM
Last Tuesday, 20:29 PM
Lady Xenarra: Does anyone else think that USF needs buffs? It feels like they’re on life support sometimes
Last Tuesday, 02:36 AM
Last Tuesday, 02:36 AM
Willy Pete: @Rosbone Ahh I missed that memo. I still think its a bad decision though. Adds frustration for players and isnt gonna make them that much money
27 Mar 2025, 15:46 PM
27 Mar 2025, 15:46 PM
Rosbone: It is also good they left it free until after the free to play weekend. Points for that.
27 Mar 2025, 09:34 AM
27 Mar 2025, 09:34 AM
Rosbone: But I agree, the cost to get a full decent Coh game pushing $115 US is not the best idea. Especially when it needs so much more work for casuals.
27 Mar 2025, 09:32 AM
27 Mar 2025, 09:32 AM
Rosbone: To be fair, it was a thank you to early fans right? They said it was not free for long and it would become a pay DLC at some point.
27 Mar 2025, 09:30 AM
27 Mar 2025, 09:30 AM
Willy Pete: Re-releasing free DLC so they can charge new players money for it. Brilliant marketing strategy 
27 Mar 2025, 04:31 AM
27 Mar 2025, 04:31 AM
Rosbone: Congrats to Relic. Looks like Coh3 has finally usurped Coh2 s the popular Coh. You smell terrific. 
.
24 Mar 2025, 02:46 AM
.24 Mar 2025, 02:46 AM
Nickbn: and again someone else replies. I mean come on guys. Give @adamírcz a chance
22 Mar 2025, 14:00 PM
22 Mar 2025, 14:00 PM
Nickbn: @Rosbone it's incredibly rude to speak on someone elses behalf, especially when a question is directly adressed to them. I understand your passion for the subject at hand but I want to hear from him.
20 Mar 2025, 10:16 AM
20 Mar 2025, 10:16 AM
Rosbone: @Nickbn No, I am just saying people should not be using any Relic owned forum since they have proven they ban anyone who says true things about Coh3.
18 Mar 2025, 19:01 PM
18 Mar 2025, 19:01 PM
Livestreams
 |
|
|
622 | ||
 |
|
|
10 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.43163.872+9
- 2.58681.879+3
- 3.800454.638-1
- 4.313114.733+9
- 5.12744.743+1
- 6.17951.778+2
- 7.282161.637+1
- 8.17773.708+3
- 9.371284.566-1
- 10.8039.672+1
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
14
Download
1357
Board Info
548 users are online:
548 guests
3 posts in the last 24h
14 posts in the last week
73 posts in the last month
14 posts in the last week
73 posts in the last month
Registered members: 53282
Welcome our newest member, 789ffan
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, 789ffan
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM