Stuart is the worst armored unit in the game, by far.
Posts: 23
Slow, inaccurate, weak weaponry, and expensive compared to other units in its class.
Discuss.
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
Posts: 23
the 250 open top halftrack has armor too, you know XD
Yes, but it's good at what it does, and it's cheap.
Posts: 219
isn't it 70 fuel? if so make it 55-60 fuel
Posts: 786 | Subs: 1
apparently it has good AT but it really doesn't excel in that regard either
Posts: 1515
Posts: 658
Stuart is in a good spot. If anything should be changed, it would be the fuel price. It's more suited to cost 55-60 fuel.
Even if it was 30 fuel it still wouldn't be worth it because the Stuart is hot garbage. Hands down the worst unit in the game next to Partisans.
The Stuart is basically a 70 fuel armored version of Rear Echelon Troops that does 0 damage and offers zero utility. M20 is like a King Tiger in Comparison to the Stuart. It is just that much better than the Stuart.
Posts: 1515
Even if it was 30 fuel it still wouldn't be worth it because the Stuart is hot garbage. Hands down the worst unit in the game next to Partisans.
The Stuart is basically a 70 fuel armored version of Rear Echelon Troops that does 0 damage and offers zero utility. M20 is like a King Tiger in Comparison to the Stuart. It is just that much better than the Stuart.
In teamgames mostly. But in 1v1s it does do it's job decently. AT is ok. Abilities are decent. AI is nothing to write home about, but is consistent. Veterancy on it is great, gaining vision.
Wouldn't really call it hot garbage. It's not as specialized as luchs, T70, flak HT, or AAHT, but it's more generalized like the AEC. Stuart and AEC are more 1v1 (maybe 2v2) unit, where there aren't a sh*tload of infantry
Posts: 556
Posts: 658
M8 being stock. I have a dream.
I would rather see the Stuart swapped with the M8 which is significantly more useful than a Stuart could ever hope to be.
Posts: 307
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
Too RNG, even at shooting sandbags which become their primary target after 5 minutes in the game.
ahahhahah post of the week
seriously we need a hall of fame thread with the bost forum posts
Posts: 1197
Posts: 503 | Subs: 1
I would rather see the Stuart swapped with the M8 which is significantly more useful than a Stuart could ever hope to be.
Erm, no. Without Stuart in LT tier Luchs/Flak HT/222/Flame HT would become insanely oppressive. I don't want to have to tech racks super early and then get zooks instead of BARs.
Posts: 1197
Erm, no. Without Stuart in LT tier Luchs/Flak HT/222/Flame HT would become insanely oppressive. I don't want to have to tech racks super early and then get zooks instead of BARs.
FlakHT, 222 and FlameHT can all be dealt with using a snare and a couple of lucky shots. Luchs is more oppressive sure,.
Posts: 1515
FlakHT, 222 and FlameHT can all be dealt with using a snare and a couple of lucky shots. Luchs is more oppressive sure,.
You serious? This is next level low IQ play here.
Posts: 219
haven't played m8 in a long time, how is the stats and price compared to the stuart?
Posts: 348
Could be useful in 1v1 but its a def a waste in team games
Livestreams
15 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.615222.735-2
- 3.35057.860+15
- 4.1110614.644+11
- 5.276108.719+27
- 6.306114.729+2
- 7.918405.694+2
- 8.262137.657+3
- 9.722440.621+4
- 10.1041674.607-2
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
5 posts in the last week
33 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, vibhak
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM