3 SU85's should take out a tiger ace
And IL-2 bombing run
Posts: 307
3 SU85's should take out a tiger ace
Posts: 307
If this game is going into a big P2W milking cow I will simply unistall it and never see it again
Posts: 307
I bought the commanders because I wanted the full online experience.
I did not buy the commanders because I support P2W.
I now hate the new commanders and consider Relic incompetent. Will not buy any more DLC. Fuck you for ruining the game I enjoyed so much, and fuck u even more if u deliberately made the commanders op to boost sales.
Posts: 307
Posts: 1944 | Subs: 2
It's just sad to read what you write. Relic is only balancing game for 1v1 and somewhat 2v2.
Any issue there is in 1v1 is magnified by factor of few for team games.
Try not to go full retard when writing posts, thanks..
Posts: 56
If someone wants to play old school
Posts: 3293
90% of the people that posted in this thread agree with Trainz if you didn't notice
Posts: 79
This way of thiking let companies do whatever they like, because they don't even have to bother being fair to customers, you will buy their product anyway.
Totally agree, cant believe how much fuss people are making, its a fact of life stuff costs money get over it! Even if they brought out the commanders for free people would still whine. Its a game, you know one of those things you play in your spare time for fun not a top level sport like some people seem to think. OMFG monopoly is so RNG with those chance cards and Mayfair is so OP I lost yesterday to the dam boot because of that!
Posts: 419
This bussiness model cleary shows that Relic/Sega was never interested in e-sport or even competetive multiplayer.
Posts: 51
I think the best solution would be to SPLIT the multiplayer in TWO portions.
First is for use of original commanders ONLY.
Second is for use of original commanders PLUS dlc ones.
If someone wants to play old school - choose first option in the game menu.
If someone wants to use these OP commanders for different gameplay - choose DLC option.
How simply it is?
Let me know what you think.
Posts: 1468 | Subs: 4
Posts: 177
Posts: 971
Posts: 2425
Permanently BannedPosts: 665
Most humorous part to me is watching people QQ about losing to T-70s when they're trying to play gren gren gren HMG mortar extended tier 1. Sorry, but I'm not sorry that that isn't going to counter a T70. You know it is coming, it is obvious that it is coming - tech sooner to compensate.
I'm not saying the doctrine shouldn't be changed, I think it should, but the game isn't doomed because one commander warps the meta-game. Unless you're in the top 25 or so pretty much every "balance" issue can be overcome by playing better. I know it is hard to admit and easy to QQ about "pay2win" commanders but at the end of the day learning to adapt and counter builds is part of any RTS.
Posts: 45
Posts: 40
Posts: 1162
Posts: 1468 | Subs: 4
Ciez: What conventional build do you recommend then as an adaptation?
114 | |||||
13 | |||||
3 | |||||
2 | |||||
7 | |||||
5 | |||||
2 | |||||
2 | |||||
2 | |||||
1 |