OK 49:55 and 51:13 is what I am talking about. If this was the only time that I ever saw this happen the thread would not exisit but I think I showcases just how weak pgrens are against units that are not even meant to be a threat to them.
Alrighty then. Your timestamps dont seem to coincide with anything, but I watched the last 20 mins.
You are right, there are a number of cases there of SU85 sniping PGren models.
More than I personally find acceptable from a primarily TD vehicle, considering how many of the few shots actually directed at PGrens, scored a model kill.
However, this is not a factor of PGren armor. Even if PGrens had 5 armor, they still would die to a SU85 direct hit.
Nor does Vet affect it at all.
Noteworthy that those PGren snipes didnt impair the PGrens with Shreks from ripping several SU85s apart.
Not even SU76s did, though they did manage more model kills.
Returning to topic, SU85 infantry accuracy may need some attention, I agree.
Too many snipes in too few shots fired.
But I dont see evidence here for buffing PGrens.
Also double checked Turtle's observation bout PGrens mid range, and it is indeed appreciable. However since it doubles when in near range, I think getting them in close, especially with their 0% movement accuracy modifier, is worth it. You "can" fire from mid range with respectable results but their near DPS is monstrous, and you deliver it consistently on the entire approach. So, the lesson to take home from this, is advance your PGrens through progressive cover. If you can avoid unnecessary model deaths on approach, and hence the high reinforce cost, they will run just about anything off the field once they reach near range.
From Sov side, flame hurts them like hell.
Protip: You can use Molotovs to place a wall of fire between yourself and assaulting PGrens. Trademrk showed me this. How cool is that, to be able to use Molotovs for a defensive purpose as well.