Login

russian armor
COH2.ORG » Replays » Interesting game

Interesting game

PAGES (1)down
Upload replay Upload replay     Upload replay New Reply
by T.R. Stormjäger 11th October 2019, 01:31 AM
Faymonville Approach (2)
Faymonville Approach
  • [00:00:06] RepoRogue: gl, hf
  • [00:00:06] Stormjäger: glhf
  • [00:00:12] Stormjäger: aren't you the reddit guy?
  • [00:00:15] RepoRogue: I've seen you around reddit, its nice to get to play against you!
  • [00:00:17] RepoRogue: Yep
  • [00:00:21] Stormjäger: Kk glhf
  • [00:32:31] RepoRogue: I can't beat the blob
  • [00:32:31] RepoRogue: gg
  • [00:32:33] RepoRogue: wp
  • [00:32:40] Stormjäger: I can't even blame you
Honor
Honor it
1
 Download
Download
13
 Chat
Show Chat
Patch: 3.0.0.23310
Duration: 00:32:42
T.R. Stormjäger
11 Oct 2019, 01:31 AM
#1
avatar of T.R. Stormjäger

Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3

Feymonville, 34 minutes, Ostheer south lv16 vs USF north lv12.

Pretty interesting game with a lot of standoffs and careful rushes around the map. I tried to be Kimbo at the start and rush the usf base, but I'm not Polish so it failed.

I like the new map as well, though I was very confused at the start with the retreat paths which costed a couple wipes.
Playercard of T.R. Stormjäger

1v1: Pstreak: - 1
1v1: Pstreak: + 1
1v1: 14streak: - 2
1v1: Pstreak: - 7


Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
RepoRogue
13 Oct 2019, 06:23 AM
#2
avatar of RepoRogue

Posts: 19

Good game! It was fun playing against you.

Spoilers for game results.

Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
empirescurropt
22 Oct 2019, 13:45 PM
#3
avatar of empirescurropt

Posts: 708 | Subs: 1

Faymonville Approach Action packed !

Very good fight !!

wp buys !!!
GGs

Game Casted!


[replay]https://www.twitch.tv/videos/498019089[/replay]
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
RepoRogue
22 Oct 2019, 20:04 PM
#4
avatar of RepoRogue

Posts: 19

jump backJump back to quoted post22 Oct 2019, 13:45 PMempirescurropt
Faymonville Approach Action packed !

Very good fight !!

wp buys !!!
GGs

Game Casted!


[replay]https://www.twitch.tv/videos/498019089[/replay]


Thanks for casting our game! I totally agree with your criticisms with my choice to go for the second Pershing. I really misplayed with my first one. I'm not sure a Sherman would have been better, but I could have pivoted into Captain tech and just started pummeling the LMG blob and the Paks with it.

I also didn't mean to imply there was anything wrong with blobbing. I just wasn't prepared that game to deal with a well controlled LMG blob. This game actually got me to really start rethinking how I build in the mid-to-late game. Similar loses, or just slower victories, have, along with the advice of better players, pushed me towards more of a focus on indirect fire to deal with Pak spam (a very valid tactic) and long range infantry blobs (another valid tactic).

In general, I'm a little to obsessed with having a balanced and mobile army, and just not flexible enough with my tech/build choices.

My opponent also played very well here, with the possible exception of the 222 base dive. Those rifle grenades vs. my MGs were absolutely killer.
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
empirescurropt
22 Oct 2019, 21:16 PM
#5
avatar of empirescurropt

Posts: 708 | Subs: 1

jump backJump back to quoted post22 Oct 2019, 20:04 PMRepoRogue


Thanks for casting our game! I totally agree with your criticisms with my choice to go for the second Pershing. I really misplayed with my first one. I'm not sure a Sherman would have been better, but I could have pivoted into Captain tech and just started pummeling the LMG blob and the Paks with it.

I also didn't mean to imply there was anything wrong with blobbing. I just wasn't prepared that game to deal with a well controlled LMG blob. This game actually got me to really start rethinking how I build in the mid-to-late game. Similar loses, or just slower victories, have, along with the advice of better players, pushed me towards more of a focus on indirect fire to deal with Pak spam (a very valid tactic) and long range infantry blobs (another valid tactic).

In general, I'm a little to obsessed with having a balanced and mobile army, and just not flexible enough with my tech/build choices.

My opponent also played very well here, with the possible exception of the 222 base dive. Those rifle grenades vs. my MGs were absolutely killer.




i dont intend to change or give proper advice its more a view of point
wen your are in deep combat action its difficult to tink clear and what decision to take its not easy to play vs a strong oponent but sometimes small changes in the type of build could be a more "effective gameplay" still was a good game just pity that dindt last longer so GG wp !
Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
T.R. Stormjäger
22 Oct 2019, 22:43 PM
#6
avatar of T.R. Stormjäger

Posts: 3588 | Subs: 3

jump backJump back to quoted post22 Oct 2019, 20:04 PMRepoRogue


Thanks for casting our game! I totally agree with your criticisms with my choice to go for the second Pershing. I really misplayed with my first one. I'm not sure a Sherman would have been better, but I could have pivoted into Captain tech and just started pummeling the LMG blob and the Paks with it.

I also didn't mean to imply there was anything wrong with blobbing. I just wasn't prepared that game to deal with a well controlled LMG blob. This game actually got me to really start rethinking how I build in the mid-to-late game. Similar loses, or just slower victories, have, along with the advice of better players, pushed me towards more of a focus on indirect fire to deal with Pak spam (a very valid tactic) and long range infantry blobs (another valid tactic).

In general, I'm a little to obsessed with having a balanced and mobile army, and just not flexible enough with my tech/build choices.

My opponent also played very well here, with the possible exception of the 222 base dive. Those rifle grenades vs. my MGs were absolutely killer.


It’s interesting because after this game I went through numerous strats and couldn’t figure out Ostheer, until i started doing my current one and jumped to rank 181 from where I was at 280.

As for the game itself you probably could have used the mgs better imo when attacking. The usf 50 cal is best in offense with its rapid set up time. A Scott for mobile indirect fire and some good mg play and I would have lost most likely.

3rd pak was a bit overkill, but I had no fuel for tanks and had to camp at VPs, so I thought might as well.

The blob was more of a result of me having to hold the middle and drain VPs, so I wasn’t trying to attack the north without tanks.
Playercard of T.R. Stormjäger

1v1: Pstreak: - 1
1v1: Pstreak: + 1
1v1: 14streak: - 2
1v1: Pstreak: - 7


Reply Reply Multi Quote Reply Reply
PAGES (1)down
Upload replay Upload replay     Upload replay New Reply
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest
COH2.ORG » Replays » Interesting game

Livestreams

Treadz
 unknown 33
hjtheman
 United States 0
HelpingHans
 United Kingdom 172

Ladders Top 10

UKF
USF
OKW
SOV
OST
1v1
2v2
3v3
4v4
  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

Top Tier Teams
VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Einhoven Country Honor
Honor it
11
 Download
Download
1267
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

754 users are online: 754 guests
0 post in the last 24h
13 posts in the last week
32 posts in the last month
Registered members: 50086
Welcome our newest member, Tamrio32892
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM