Profile of Puppetmaster

Why does people rage post on forums when they lost a match? I'll never understand.

Because people would rather believe they lost because X ability or X faction is OP and needs nerfing, rather than realising they probably lost because either their opponent was better or they made mistakes.

"isn't worth very much because I don't play allies" should have been your first and only sentence in the thread.

I've said it before and I will say it again.

People who do not play all factions and are clearly biased, should not be allowed in the balance forum.

but we havent seen this tank in any mode like past!

I would suggest you:



(UK Joke) Show Spoiler

There was a tiger in one of your games yesterday.....................


On topic, Tiger is fine.

hard time repair

This isn't the fault of the tiger, but of power creep and no repair changes to Ost / Sov. If you like we could drop the health of the Tiger, making it faster to repair

easilly penetrate by su76

SU76 has roughly a 63% chance to penetrate, hardly easily (I don't know how to calculate close / far pen).

Also, WTS bias. WTB thread lock.

K thx bye

There aren't commanders with scopes and railway. But well recon + nuke is impossible to avoid on anything bigger than 1v1.

Not but there is with Stuka dive bomb , pretty much the same in this instance

Not to rain on your parade but.... you guys were losing 85-498 VPs with almost no map control until the brit player dropped from the game. Until that point you had killed 0 of his 3 emplacements. Maybe you meant to show how strong the brit cheese is LOL.

Side note: it's hilarious to watch an un-braced bofors almost outheal the damage from 2 mortar HT flame barrages + normal attacks with only repairs from the forward assembly engineers. Good shit.

For the first 10 - 15 minutes of the game we had more map control than they did, I was also doing a decent job of harassing their fuel point and had 2 caches up by 11 minutes (a 3rd by 12 minutes though it wasn't alive for that long) so didnt need to have total map control (they hadn't built any caches).

I deliberately didn't attack the emplacements before I was ready because it drains my man power / resources and feeds the emplacements vet. As you saw from my ally his MHT / mortars were getting attacked by counter barrage.

At 20 minutes when my LeFh was ready I had:

3x LMG Grens (1x Vet 3 2x Vet 2)
Sweeper Pios
Pak40
2x 222 /w Spotting Scopes (Vet 2)
Panther
LeFH

He had:

2x IS No weapons (Vet 2)
Cromwell (Vet 1)
3 Emplacments
2 Mines up, Not in the most optimal places. No ATG.

The Brit was pretty much done at this point. He has pretty much no army to deal with mine and my LeFH means his emplacements are on borrowed time (though I cleared the northern Bofors without my LeFH). Sure we had lost a lot of VP's at this point, but whats the point to drain my MP attacking his emplacements, delaying my Panther / LeFH and feeding his emplacements vet.

A Win is a win whether its at 500 VPs or 1 VP. My ally seemed to have problems with the USF Blob. If he was doing better vs that then map control would have been better and our VP's would not have drained that low. Point still stands though that we won.

Care to share your replay vs top 25 ranked 2v2 Brit? How about your playercard?


Also as a general comment, I don't think people who do not play all factions (specifically Allies or Brits) at all should be commenting on balance.