Profile of Junaid

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 509

General Information
Register Time: 4 Mar 2014, 04:14 AM
Last Visit Time: 3 May 2017, 19:33 PM


Thread: Design Suggestion re USF vehicles (less bugs)2 Jul 2016, 11:56 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Jun 2016, 16:11 PMElSlayer You didn't understood how it affected number of tanks. I explained. Why do you think that I defending it? I don't even care about its existance. I never use it, except maybe when I want to keep M20 on my base in case if I urgently need mines, but don't need M20 itself. Happens 1 in 20 games because I suck at unit preservation. Ah ok then. I apologize for not understanding your intent. In: Lobby
Thread: More hotfix incoming2 Jul 2016, 10:21 AM Lol i knew they'd mess this up In: Lobby
Thread: USF exploit still exists29 Jun 2016, 23:41 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Jun 2016, 21:03 PMXoctic I see. Yeah thats pretty stupid, relic just loves fucking everybody over I guess. I mean what do they have to lose, they already made all the money they can Yes its despicable. I'm currently shopping around for an alternative rts, but don't know of any yet sadly In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Any reason for it?29 Jun 2016, 23:36 PM katitof's analysis is a bit misleading cause he doesn't take moving accuracy into account. Most tank fights are fights of movement. Relic really shafted EFA factions in this regard though, so both t34 and p4 ought to have same moving accuracy OR shermans/cromwell need to be toned down. EDIT: I fully support his use of stats though. More people ought to use numbers. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Design Suggestion re USF vehicles (less bugs)29 Jun 2016, 12:41 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Jun 2016, 05:33 AMElSlayer By freeing popcap. You mean pop-cap exploit. You're defending it? In: Lobby
Thread: Design Suggestion re USF vehicles (less bugs)29 Jun 2016, 12:39 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Jun 2016, 05:57 AMlanciano Isn't the reason usf have weaker vehicles because they can pop out and self repair? Usf vehicles armour would have to be on Par with the factions if the self repair ability was removed. Plz read OP more carefully. USF is not losing self repair nor crit repair nor territory cap. In: Lobby
Thread: Reworking muh Riflemen29 Jun 2016, 00:29 AM OP why dont you put up some replays of your mod? id be happy to help you test if you want. i mean, usf is kinda stale in rifle reliance and all In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Design Suggestion re USF vehicles (less bugs)29 Jun 2016, 00:21 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Jun 2016, 20:51 PMGhostTX I'd say the manpower flexing is important, as allies need more of the glass tanks to overcome the Axis tanks. Being able to manage the crews and get that extra one or two tanks, is crucial, since allies can't 1:1 axis tanks, even with combined arms (riflemen/at gun) support. i dont understand your post. how does this change affect no. of usf tanks? In: Lobby
Thread: Design Suggestion re USF vehicles (less bugs)28 Jun 2016, 20:32 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Jun 2016, 20:05 PMbicho1 self ripair is free ? crit repair will cost 10 ammo ? Yes ofcourse! It wouldn't be a replacement otherwise! In: Lobby
Thread: Design Suggestion re USF vehicles (less bugs)28 Jun 2016, 19:55 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Jun 2016, 16:59 PMBudwise It was a bad mechanic from the start. They should have to have RE's to repair like every other faction. It's not a risk/reward, its just reward. Nobody abandons their Sherman on the front lines to repair it, they go back to a safe place. All this mechanic does is allow USF players to not have to preserve their RE squads. And no free vet 3 zooka squads popping out of things to counter their counters etc. It's just silly. Either RE's can't repair and keep this mechanic or drop the crew mechanic. USF can't have the best of both worlds. tbh i kinda agree with you that there is little risk in this mechanic, but I know for a fact that complete removal is not at all possible. Which is why i suggested alternative abilities to cover the same things. In: Lobby