Profile of Burts

isu-152 was complete complete dog crap pre patch.

Like it had paper armor, shitty AT , ISU-152 had less pen than SU-85 or even IS-2!

Like it was the perfect unit if you want to throw the game away...

1V1s im talking about here.

Now isu-152 is overperforming. Needs range reduction.

what i have noticed is that the ISU-152 has a minimum range. Even a shitty stug can kill it if it gets close.

i woudn't say pgs are useless. Yes, they might be a bit squishy, but they deal the best medium range dps of all units beating even i believe DP gaurds at close mid range.


And from a realistic point of view "elite infantry" which are armed for example only with ppsh or MP44s shouldn't be too useful and should only work in specific situations.

There is a reason why everyone made more rifles than SMGs and for example every 12 man soviet squad had 1 dp. Rifles were not made en mass because they were cheap, a mosin nagant or a kar 98k was simply better than a ppsh or mp 40. Machine guns were another vital part of infantry combat.
Which is why in this game having either a maxim or HMG 42 or Dp gaurds or lmg grens is very very important.

Simply put it, a rifle is effective in all situations. Whether it be close range, medium range or long range.

Weapons such as ppsh or mp 44 are not all-round weapons.

The reason why shocks and pgs are not effective is because of the maps.

Pretty much all maps 1v1 except semois and stalingrad are open or nearly open fields. Which is kind of sad because there was so much urban fighting... The most epic battles except maybe for kursk were fought in urban areas......

i usually get a katyusha when playing the advanced warfare commander

4 cons molotov
maxim and zis 2x
katyusha
t-34/85s

well, now that ive done some testing i think ALL arty needs a buff

All arty was a crucial part of WW2 whether mortars, field guns altirelly or whatever.