Profile of Australian Magic

Anyways: "Everything changed when the nation of WFA attacked"

Hard to disagree.
There was a time when Grens with LMG were beast and we were thinking how to lower their DPS.
There was a time when Elephnat was untouchable.

And then WFA came out

That mine is a non doctrinal regal, The tiger won't be retreating.

It's but you can't have mines, at guns and jacksons. Mines and at guns or mines and jackson or at gun and jackson.
Sure you can go for airborne and get doc at gun but what's the point of makinf only 1 doctrine useful? In fact it's already the only useful...



By the way, once I posted my replay. 3 Jacksons vs 1 Panther. 6 shell, one by one bounced... Is it right?

You do realize that zooks have a ONE HUNDRED percent chance to penetrate the rear armor of a panther at all ranges, right? If you're blitzing in to flank something with your Panther, you'll easily be exposing your rear armor to zooks.

Yes, people don't always have them - I actually think they're a little too expensive fuel-wise. Just wanted to point out the obvious flaw in your statement. They are in fact a threat to all Ost armor except for the Tiger (because of higher rear armor than the panther)

Really wanna know where your arbitrary claim of 40% chance for Panther to beat an Is-2 is coming from. It's pretty much a 0% chance for the Panther to score a kill on an Is-2 if a ZiS gun is around, or if the Soviet knows that his munitions can be used to plant mines.

If it is an actual 1v1, with no interference - which will never happen - the Panther has a 100% chance of beating the Is-2 as long as it has an infantry unit spotting for it. Probably a 0% chance of winning in a vacuum 1v1 (doesn't mean anything though).

Same exact logic applies to Jackson vs Tiger.

Yes but Pnahter has 800hp, not 480 and bazzoka deals 80 dmg, not 120.
Upgrading for zooks, grenades and bars can be deadly for USF because it delays Sherman for about 4mins. You have to give up something.

I was testing Panther vs IS2 but in fact I can't remember if it was Panther or vet 2 Panther... I think Vet 2.. and Vet 2 Panther has a chance to win against IS2. It depends if RNG is behind you. Maybe not 40% but 30% tho.

Maxims in green cover will beat Obers easily. You also have flamer penals which do well, mortars, snipers and tanks. Sure the KV-1 isn't great against other tanks but it is solid against infantry. Although I do think that Obers could use some nerfing, they're pretty stupid strong (but then again LMG paras are even more stronger than vet 5 Obers).

Anyways I think you're missing the entire point of our argument Australian Magic. When one faction is *forced* into a *doctrinal* counter to your *doctrinal* unit, a flaw exists somewhere that needs addressing. CoH 2 should not be a rock-paper-scissors game of commander selection. The stock armies should have the capability of countering any doctrinal units, with commanders adding to variety based on player's preferences and perhaps the map. This same imbalance can be seen with stuff like the Jagdtiger, although more-so in team-games than 1v1 - if your team doesn't have access to P47... good luck ever killing that JT. Similarly if you don't have access to IS2s or T34/85s as Soviet you're going to have a much harder time dealing with Tigers, although ZiS guns are still solid against them.

Long story short, the B4 should not force a doctrinal counter-pick from your opponent. It just doesn't add up to compelling game play. Furthermore the B4 should NOT have the ability to 1-shot KTs from full hp, let alone anything else that happens to be within a screen's width of that nuclear impact.

We (maybe I should say Relic) have proven in the past that some things simply should not exist within this game as veterency buffs. With regard to the B4 these include - increased damage and decreased barrage cooldown. I'd also make the argument that all precision strikes should be re-worked just like Blitz should be re-worked (it's really freaking stupid when you think about it... what... the tank driver just magically grows rocket boosters or some pudding on the back of the tank? c'mon now... why not like a toggle-able muni cost to increase accuracy for 30 sec or something to use during a big push). But anyways, as I've said - Relic has decided that these types of veterency bonuses simply do not fall in line with the rest of the game mechanics and, numerous times in the past, have been removed because of their overly dramatic impact on game play (alpha rifle vet, katyusha/werfer vet bonuses, ML-20/leFH18 vet bonuses are examples of these principles) - so why then should the B4 be the exception to this rule? The Pack Howi also breaks the mold in this regard and, to not surprise, magically becomes completely stupid when it hits vet 2 (although it sucks for its price before vet 2 so re-working the vet 2 would need compensation in other arenas). Furthermore, while I'm on the topic of the Counterattack doctrine in general - For Mother Russia is completely broken because it adds raw damage - and not raw accuracy to units.

Penals, mortars, sniper, maxims. Theoretically all of these units can counter Obers but practically penals will die before reach obers, snipers need huge attention which is sometimes hard in late game, mortars are very rng dependant and maxims need terrain advantage, althogh 4-5 vetted obers can handle them easily.

Why do you think paras are stronger? DPS is similar but veteranscy buffs for Obers are insane.

Relic designed game for doctrinal counters. That's something we have to deal with.
Yet I think before WFA it was quite nice. I mean, you could counter Tiger with SU or IS with Panther, no matter which doctrine you chose. The only problem was with Elephnat because SU85 is useless against Ele and T34 is too weak but if we remove USF and OKW right now, the game would be someplace near to the level when you dont need to pick up doctrinal counter.
Everything have changed since WFA.


Non-doc King Tiger, immune to small fire 5 vet Volks shredding tanks, Obers like terminators, Jadgtiger.
It's really hard to counter such units for Soviets without doctrinal help.
Units like non-doc T34/85 and SU100 would change a lot (t34/76 could be low CP call in and SU85 could be placed in some Anti tank doctrine). But that's not gonna happen.

On the other hand, OKW can counter everything with non-doc units (except arty, although Stuka could do it).

When (if) Relic will fix B-4 pop cap bug, it should solve few issues. Then you could try to counter it with non-doc units like Stuka or PzWerfer.
Other option are reduction of health, decreasing range or something like that.

Yes, I agree it should not kill King Tiger with single shot but it should take more than half health in my opinion.
Maybe instead of +50% it should get +25%? B4 does not shoot with 4-6 shells. There is only 1 so it has to powerful.

I won't argue about Mother Russia since I dont use it often - spamming Huuurah, Molotov and AT nades needs a lot of muni...

B-4 can kill KT in 1 shot only with Mother Russia or Mark Target is also needed?
I don;t rememeber...

it's not the only unit you have against obers. maxims can work to pin and there are numerous other options, both doctrinal and not, for dealing damage. they're not all ideal in all circumstances but you have options.

Post of the year

Obers wreck maxims before maxims do anything.