Gun's? Were? Axis has 1 AT gun and one mobile rocket platform.
It's not like the Pak43 has been out of meta for ages since artillery proliferation became a thing.
Zooks got a price reduction to make them easier to get in more plentiful numbers, and the PTRS has AI utility the Shrek does not. Outside of RNG snipes all the factions are now on a much more level playing field than they ever were before.
Axis (especially OKW) has to fight a lot of armor. And are you implying British units do not have good armor? Also you do know that the the Pak40 only has 10 more pen than the ZiS gun does right, and the Rackten has the same penetration as a ZiS gun.
You are hopleless here. No point of keeping it.
Im showing how your logic is invalid and broken and you tell me that pak43 is out of meta, while it has nothing to do with it.
Best at guns belong to axis yet they face paper armor for which is impossible to bounce Pak shell or even schreck (chance to bounce for E8 is just pure laught).
Yet you say that IS should not have 45 because it's not facing 60 range, but you dont want to apply that logic to axis units.
Im saying about paper armour, you about amount of tanks. Again, you just jump around the point.
On the other hand bazooka and 57mm with bad penetration must face a lot bigger armour.
Yes, zis is good but still worse.
Im not saying nerf axis at, buff allied.
Im saying how your logic is defined for axis on this one.
Plus, I dont take brits into this, because they are still during beta process.
No point of keeping this. Im done.
0
tadevosiana
~TAB~Australian Magic
~TAB~Australian Magic
Relic Entertainment
보드카 중대 
