Profile of Losttruppen

If you have used OKW in this patch you would know they do not float at all anymore, especially with Fallschirmjager or mg34 doctrines. Perhaps you should adapt your strategy away from volks into obers into tanks.

I don't think we should hamstring axis abilities because their ally counterparts are worse, that goes against the entire asymmetric design of the game. I wouldn't be opposed to soviet supply being buffed, but because soviets depend on call ins for late game you would most likely only see this in arranged teams with a support build.

As for fuel being the determining factor late game for axis, I completely disagree. Even if you maintain units like you are supposed to you will still be held back by manpower far more often as Wehrmacht unless the game is really long or you suffer heavy tank losses.

This doc just starts to snowball significantly in the late game where you already have most of your standing army so your manpower is mostly for reinforcement or replacement. This is something of a problem for all large team games where resource management is thrown out the window and you end up churning out tigers and is2s as soon as you lose one.

This doctrine also mirrors the tactics the Wehrmacht actually employed after the encirclement of Stalingrad not that this should determine much for balance.

Fuel transfer to munitions is also only one player but that's the main topic of this thread. As for Luftwaffe supply you spend 200 mp for 50 fuel or 150 munitions, which is roughly 40 seconds of mp income for 2 minutes of fuel or munitions dropped over the span of one minute.

I wouldn't be opposed to a 1-3 minute cooldown after the drop timer ends as right now on the proper map you can have a limitless supply of munitions and still come out 30 munitions on top after dropping a flame strike. Maybe even half the cost and return to 100 mp for 25 fuel, 75 munitions on top of the cooldown.

On a well balanced map with fuel and munitions in contested territory you have 1 minute to respond and potentially steal these resources, so again I feel we shouldn't punish a doctrine for poor map design.

These care packages can be destroyed by any explosive so an arty strike on the territory circle can destroy all the crates or push the harvesting unit off the point enough to attempt an attack. I don't know if you can target them with small arms or if you need to use attack ground or barrage. They can also fall into rivers and off the map resulting in a significant loss of return on your investment.

These are quite fantastic in a building with good sight and firing lines and you can keep assault troops away from it.

I would argue the 25% received accuracy should be removed from all team weapons and soviets should revert to 4(mortar) or 5(maxim, as they need to be on the front line) man teams as I feel they have a proper amount of durability right now.

Katitof is right in that these units are being shot at by anti-infantry units meant to deal with 6 man teams, but these are essentially 3 man teams with the received accuracy debuff.

I don't see that as a problem with the current role of ostheer tier units.

Pz4 sits in a perfect spot right now as early dependable armour(especially after the jackson changes) that can hold off anything from early shermans to heavy tanks with vet and proper support and give time for your choice of call-ins.

Panthers are the alternative when you pick a doctrine without heavy tanks and this will be your only end-game viable armour or need speed over power. I only wish you weren't hamstrung by the massive MP costs to get it and as a result you see more tigers.

Ostheer units provide a level of overlap that I quite enjoy compared to most other factions. Skipping t3 would be entirely viable as you have PaKs, tellars, and Shrek Panzergrens for early armour. Even the 222 can fulfill light AA against recon planes.