some people don't seem to understand the problem.Lets say we have a conscript squad. And an Mg-42 with a gren squad.Oorah molotov costs the same as the riflegrenade
nope.
however, while getting close, conscripts will take considerable damage and will lose atleast 3 crewmembers
If they attack through the middle of the road.
At best, they can kill 2 crewmembers, often , they wont kill anything.
If german players repositions in due time his mg, there are 50% chances for the mg not to lose one model, and 50% chances to lose one model. If german player doesn't move his mg in due time, he might lose between 3 and all crew members
Now lets say we have a grenadier approaching a maxmim,while 1 conscript squad is gaurding it. Maxim surpresses grenadiers, and grenadiers fire rifle nade. They kill 3 men, which is 45 manpower
2, 3, or 4 men, depening on situation.
And grens retreat with probaly no losses ( might have lost one)
Yes, if maxim is alone. If 1 con squad is next to maxim like in your example, be sure they will lose more.
So there you have it folks, that is the problem. Grenadiers can assault maxim and inflict manpower losses while losing no manpower, while soviets can assault an mg for and cause some manpower losses, but probaly taking more while doing so.
Not convinced.
i can't take anything you say seriously, too much bias