Profile of Gbpirate

Avatar Area

Offline United States
Posts: 1156 | Subs: 1

General Information
Register Time: 20 Jan 2014, 06:00 AM
Last Visit Time: 9 Oct 2025, 20:43 PM
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/gbpirate
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCON2ubiyRfjP0HY9AGAuXIw
Steam: 76561198035726839
Residence:

Canada
Nationality:

United States
Timezone: America/Toronto
Game Name: GBPirate

Show Latest Posts


Thread: R1 G1 Vasa v GBPirate10 Oct 2015, 15:53 PM Good game. It took a while! In: Replays
Thread: Mirror USF at gun with UKF 6 pounder 7 Oct 2015, 05:00 AM Red Bear, even though we are in rival clans and I hate you very much, I will respond courteously to your thread: non, monsieur. jk. I like you. also, btw, I think USF AT gun shouldn't get pen with vet. It should get high pen like all AT guns then increased accuracy, RoF, or whatever AT guns usually get at vet. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What was the point of introducing DOT flame damage?5 Oct 2015, 06:02 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Oct 2015, 05:52 AMHon3ynuts Why would you build a tank for denying cover though? It seems redundant since at that point in the game tanks just blow up all the cover or kill infantry outright with their high burst damage. Infantry flamers i can see why you might differentiate them there are tons of other options for anti infantry upgrades. However for a tank it is either going to be better or worse vs infantry than something with a cannon and if its worse you will go for the unit that can also engage other tanks. In other words flamer tanks can only be anti infantry specialists or serve no strategic function in game. I can see the intent for infantry and the results seem like a positive direction for infantry(i try to avoid green cover and garrisons vs flamers) but for tanks the changes just don't make much sense I think it may be a way for a player to push of high-vetted infantry with LMGS. With such high dps, penals, cons, rifles can easily get repulsed by LMG Obers/vetted LMG grens, which are useless against a KV-8 or a Croc. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Blobing as whermach = easy game mode4 Oct 2015, 07:34 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Oct 2015, 23:10 PMDanigermid Ah i almost forget about that abilities like bomb or cannon run... and they can spam them all the time... Lol what? Ostheer can spam call-ins? The only time I can conceivably spam any sort of off-map is with CAS or deliberate construction of muni caches. In that case, Stuka CAS from Lightning War, Blitzkrieg, or Jaeger Infantry is the go-to spam, but that happens in rare cases. Also, as a note, *Wehrmacht Finally, everything suggested here would work to counter blobs. MGs, Pack Howitzer, Centaur, Mines/Demo, etc. I don't know what your rank is but, typically, as players get higher ranks, blobbing is encountered less often in 1v1s and 2v2s the closer one's rank gets to 1. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: COH 2 becoming pointless3 Oct 2015, 06:08 AM Is it acceptable to make an account to complain? OP has two posts... In: Lobby
Thread: Star Crossed Cup 4 Signups3 Oct 2015, 05:20 AM ~TAB~ GBPirate 76561198035726839 In: Events Central
Thread: Tank-Flamer will BURN/Kill tanks ?2 Oct 2015, 22:22 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Oct 2015, 19:34 PMferwiner It was pretty common during ww2 to destroy tanks by throwing molotovs or granades inside. Ofc if you were not able to throw it inside you would aim the engine but that made tanks hard to repair, removing smoking bodies from inside is much less of a problem. Such tanks could be and were used then. You wouldn't throw a molotov cocktail inside a tank. You would throw it on the engine, or on the treads of tanks (if they were made out of rubber) in order to disable it. Jump back to quoted post2 Oct 2015, 18:45 PMPaRaNo1a Alcohol in the air in a Russian tank? You must try harder, most probably they were getting out to ask for more molotovs I don't think you understood what I said. What I said, really, is wrong. Molotovs were actually mass-produced. For some reading: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Molotov_cocktail#Finland In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Tank-Flamer will BURN/Kill tanks ?2 Oct 2015, 18:30 PM I mean, any fire could potentially disable a tank. The Finns threw molotovs on the back of T34s over the engine block so the crew would be forced to evacuate because there would be burning alcohol on the air intake for the engine/crew and exhaust. Essentially, you don't have to make a tank an oven, you just have to make the crew unable to breathe so they're forced out. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why does the UKF have offmap arty without need of vision!1 Oct 2015, 06:21 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Sep 2015, 23:25 PMDaktDakter 442142131 Hmm looks like someone got his pak/puppchen/shrek walls wiped out L2P and adapt. Build vehicles, it's not sim city or ANNO2070 bro. I don't mean to be rude, and my French has been rather poor in recent months, but, I must say, with all due respect, fuck you. This is most certainly not a L2P issue. Frankly, the issue that Iron Emperor has brought up in this thread is a legitimate issue. Every off-map artillery/air-strike ability that belongs to the original and the WFA factions needs to have line of sight to be called in. If you, or someone else would like to prove me wrong, then so be it. But in the meantime, don't be a condescending asshole. Thanks. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Exchanging punches29 Sep 2015, 21:49 PM Me getting rekt in the end by GenObi. I realizeed that, rather than spam nades, if I would've planted tellers, this game may have turned out a lot differently... Also, Centaur wrecks everything. (My poor Stukas) In: Replays