Profile of elchino7

Jump back to quoted post17 Jul 2014, 13:11 PMKatitof

Oh, but please, name these bad P2W commanders that were not elite troops or soviet industry.

Please, tell us exactly which ones and in which way were stronger then say guard motor or shock rifle or lightning war or spearhead or the ele doctrine?

Two commanders were clear P2W.

Every single other one? Clueless noobs complaining about stuff they have never faced before and screamed OP because they were completely clueless on how to adapt and learn counters. Best example? Mechanized Assault, where oh so op AssGrens were nerfed hard only to be brought back to the state where they are STRONGER then they were released and its not like it was the only unit in that doctrine that got this kind of treatment, so please, don't say about P2W, when you're absolutely clueless and stuck in denial. You don't even know what P2W is.

Jump back to quoted post17 Jul 2014, 09:25 AMOZtheWiZARD

So as I said before: Lets not compromise 1v1 balance due to team games disproportions.

Jump back to quoted post17 Jul 2014, 11:46 AMCardboard Tank

They were totally underpowered before WFA.

With WFA they became useful again. I still preferred my Grens with LMGs but every now and then I actually built one for the hell of it. But still LMG Grens where the first choice. In some situations they were on par with LMG Grens - in most cases (US blob comes to mind) you were safer with Grens.

Now even with this minor nerf again, the PGs are not useful any longer. I could built them before for the hell of it but this slight nerf causes me to not build them any longer. That´s sufficient to make the unit useless. Especially when you need to get closer to the enemy (blob) with PGs to do damage. This will often result in your PG getting killed.

PGs now remind me of the old Penal Battalion. Costing more from the start, costing more to reinforce and performing worse/ exactly like a cheaper Conscript.