Profile of elchino7

Nerf P47, too stronk!

You could reduce a bit splash and direct damage, but that's it.

Because i think the discussion is focusing in the "wrong" direction of the problem, i'll quote myself again.

Static artillery lives on a black and white world, where you either have the direct hardcounter or you pray to make a push so powerful that you are able to YOLO your tanks into the enemy base.

IMO: static artillery design is a bit flawed.
With the new changes, i think offmap (besides Stuka) don't 1 shot artillery. Perfect.
Artillery shouldn't be able to be built under the protection of the MG bunkers, inside the base.
This also means no automatic reinforcement or healing.
By making artillery more vulnerable, you could reduce a bit the mp to build them making them a bit more affordable on 1v1.

Specifically talking about the B4:
Veterancy shouldn't be affecting reload time neither damage.
Vet1: PS
Vet2: increase rotation speed/aim time etc.
Vet3: range

The weapon on itself needs a huge increase on popcap while reducing the crew popcap. This solves crewing it with CE to reduce popcap and mp drain.

____________________...________________________________

My line of thought is that you shouldn't be FORCE to choose a commander to remain competitive or be able to deal with a doctrinal/nondoc unit.

Those who are saying just use a Stuka commander, are directly falling in the same discussion as the ISU vs EleJT, Call in meta, or let's just use the same commanders over and over again because they are the only reliable ones.

You shouldn't have to use an ISU because the blobbing army is too strong. You shouldn't have to use a JT to counter the ISU. You shouldn't have to use a B4 to be able to deal with a JT/KT. You shouldn't have to go Close Air support/Jaeger Armor to deal with the B4.

____________________...________________________________


TL;DR: Static artillery needs to be more affordable but more vulnerable to non offmap threats. B4 needs to be bring more in line with the other artillery regarding veterancy and crew, while the other 2 need some love.

M10 should arrive earlier. It should have the same HP as the Jackson.

The Jackson will remain a hard* unit to use (besides 1on1) and you can't really buff** it without changing the damage per shell.

I remember certain unit which dealt the same damage per shell, but it got a reload buff and damage nerf to make it more consistent.

*It's easier to lose since you have a minor margin of error.
**A buff on pen, when using AP, is not out of mind.

This is basically for those who didn't want to/know how change some values inside the replay files.

Good news.

Player card doesn't mean as much as people like to think it does

If you are actually high-ranked someone will be along to tell you that you "obviously" got that way through cheese strats and abusing the current meta

At least you know a couple of things:
-The meta
-How to properly make use of it

You don't need to be able to apply the knowledge, rather than having it to have a proper discussion. Thing is, theres too many wannabe compstomp theorycrafter fanboy warriors4v4 only players * who impose in others L2P (whenever i use X unit or in my hands that would never happen) and hide on the annonimity of the internet.

*Joke. But theres a reality on which big game modes don't take into consideration some factors of the game and potentially makes other worst.