Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: New infantry grouping20 Nov 2014, 18:41 PM DAT MVP Puma. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Highfiveeeee's Yay or Nay - Commander rotation coming back?20 Nov 2014, 18:39 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Nov 2014, 17:33 PMdasheepeh I dont understand why you wouldnt want it back tbh.. It removes value for those who have bought them. :Brought2ubyps2logic: In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: The imbalance between Allied and Axis Infantry Anti-tank 20 Nov 2014, 17:49 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Nov 2014, 17:38 PMand Not true. The veterancy bonuses are so high at the moment that there is plenty of room for reducing them without making them insignificant. Hmmm, OH-SU-USF veterancies are fine. In fact, vet1 from vcoh2 factions should get a massive overhauling (i made a post about how lackluster they are). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF Mortar Half Track20 Nov 2014, 17:41 PM Copy pasting the stats from the OH MHT is too hard In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The imbalance between Allied and Axis Infantry Anti-tank 20 Nov 2014, 13:57 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Nov 2014, 13:29 PMand 3rd option: reduce veterancy bonuses for all units, all factions. Fixes the efficiency of a vet volks/ober blob. Fixes the ability for vet inf to take HMGs head on. Fixes the advantage heavy tanks have over medium tanks too. Basically a lot of problems would be evened out if veterancy bonuses were redesigned. What if i told you that high dps (mostly due to upgraded weapons) is what makes infantry to take HMG head on. If you plain reduce vet bonuses theres little point on having vet units. Veterancy still requires a redesign. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The imbalance between Allied and Axis Infantry Anti-tank 20 Nov 2014, 13:12 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Nov 2014, 12:56 PMschnuersi Yes I do know this. CoH1 works this way and this concept has not been changed for CoH2. This it the asymetrical balance wich is often cited. This is the basic concept of CoH and what makes it different to other RTS games. Its also what makes it so difficult to balance. If you don't like that you really should not wast your time with it. Even if the current balance problems are solved this will not be changed. It will work as intended in contrast to now where it doesn't. The game isn't frustrating its challenging. But not for one but both. Only in different ways. The Germans start loosing and need to hang on to a small part of the map and one VCP to win. The Allies start winning and will loose over time unless they seize all VCP. That doesn't mean one is easier or more frustrating than the other. The roles are pre defined but not how you fill it out. You also are free to play the faction wich has a style you like. If it gets frustrating there is nothing that prevents you from calling gg and end the game right there. Nobody forces you to play on even though you know you can't win anymore. With CoH a longer game is not automatically a better one. Part of the concept is a average game length in the 20-30 minute range. Wich from my point of view is part of the appeal. Currently if a game goes on for 20 minuts and the Germans hit max veterancy for their starting units and roll out heavy armor you might as well call it a day. Unless the tickers are really in your favour and you have an ISU chances are if you couldn't win it in the past 20 minutes this won't change in the next 10. Coh1 =/= Coh2 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The imbalance between Allied and Axis Infantry Anti-tank 20 Nov 2014, 13:04 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Nov 2014, 12:17 PMtuvok they already tweaked at guns received xp, they're definitely open to that But that's completely different. Let me clarify. AT guns: they increased the amount of xp required to vet. They didn't change how much xp they gave to other units. Now, let's go with volks. Volks: -if you increase the amount of xp required to vet, thats would be a huge nerf since you can't just depend on them getting shrecks and fighting vehicles in order to gain veterancy. -if you decrease the amount of xp vehicles gave, you are just altering the whole ecosystem. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The imbalance between Allied and Axis Infantry Anti-tank 20 Nov 2014, 11:15 AM But that's not how the game works. You could try and tweak how much vehicles give experience but that would need a huge overhaul. PD: i'm still waiting for that Jaigen's replay. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Jagdtiger20 Nov 2014, 10:57 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Nov 2014, 08:53 AMGustavGans The nerf was necessary. Although I also think it needs a price reduction or a severe reduction of the chance of getting stunned. Anyway, if we see a less ISU meta, i expect to even see less this unit which is good. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: AA Review: It is a bit too easy 19 Nov 2014, 15:10 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Nov 2014, 13:36 PMBurts Elchino (for some reason quote did not work) You should play men of war red tide or any men of war game on hard difficulty levels. That game is really hard. And when i mean hard, prepare to frontally assault a heavily defended with tanks mortars and artillery enemy position across an open field with 10 guys and 1 armored car, then also resist mulitple counterattacks with those same 10 guys and 1 armored car That's artificially hard. Not because the AI makes good decisions, rather than having a better army which still has to make stupid decisions in order for you to be able to win with an inferior army. In: COH2 Gameplay