Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: People are probably taking this game too seriously 24 May 2015, 03:25 AM Jump back to quoted post24 May 2015, 01:59 AMmeh This isn't a Soccer Game, there is nothing they have in common other then 2 teams, and even the teams are hardly random. They way the scoring system is different, the way they win is different. Soccer had Refs, and if you wanna call refs RNG, then maybe.... Coin toss at beggining of game Although in the pass, coin toss has defined the winner of a match. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Are guards' DPs worth the muni?24 May 2015, 03:17 AM Jump back to quoted post24 May 2015, 02:09 AMCookiezNcreem Well if veterancy based received accuracy doesnt switch over why would the initial received accuracy? putting a conscript in a guard squad would make it horribly worse then because that 1.087 conscript received accuracy at vet 0(assuming the original conscript entity veterancy doesnt transfer) would make the guards,no matter their veterancy,into vet 0 conscripts when merged enough..which isnt the case. Basically Received accuracy is squad specific like veterancy because received accuracy changes with veterancy.... I look for it and you are right. Armor is applied entity wise, while it seems that base receive accuracy applies to squads. received_accuracy_modifier: { \| \| \| \| \| \| $REF: "modifiers\received_accuracy_modifier.lua"; \| \| \| \| \| \| application_type: "apply_to_squad"; \| \| \| \| \| \| exclusive: false; \| \| \| \| \| \| modifier_id: ""; \| \| \| \| \| \| negative_tooltip: 11001782; \| \| \| \| \| \| positive_tooltip: 11001783; \| \| \| \| \| \| target_type_name: ""; \| \| \| \| \| \| usage_type: "multiplication"; \| \| \| \| \| \| value: 1.087f; Your explanation is not correct although, cause previously, armor was modified by veterancy. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Let's talk about Volksgrenadiers24 May 2015, 02:10 AM Jump back to quoted post24 May 2015, 00:15 AMAlexzandvar The con PPSH is inferior to the Shock One. You can make weapons have different stats for different units. Not in the case of weapons that can be dropped. Performance of them is only affected by squad modificators. (That is why you shouldnt pick LMG from Partisans) Note: reminder that you shouldn't also pick Bars with SP/Falls/PG In: COH2 Balance
Thread: No tech demo just poor design.24 May 2015, 02:05 AM Jump back to quoted post24 May 2015, 00:12 AMAlexzandvar This sentence doesn't make any sense. USF has a fraction of the munition sinks Ostheer and OKW do and you yourself said we see few demo's from them. I think it's clear. You have munition sinks: 1919s, flamers, Bars, Zooks (yeah at least you have the possibility), nades, MG gunner, etc. Therefore you have less munition to expend in demos. As OH i'll say you'll have a pretty hard time fielding them as you prioritize other things first: medics, LMGs, Tellers. Jump back to quoted post24 May 2015, 00:12 AMAlexzandvar If you give Axis demo's (Ostheer standard and OKW in a doctrine); you won't see as many yes but the option will actually be there for players who want to use it. That's exactly my point. Jump back to quoted post23 May 2015, 23:50 PMdaspoulos Considering that demoes cost 90 munitions, I think requiring them to be hidden is a bad idea, if you think nerfing their camouflage is a good idea then reducing cost needs to be domne. My point is allowing a bit more counterplay (paying attention to the battlefield) as a way to balance the power they have. On a similar way on how S-minefield have the signs. If that means reducing the price, it would be ok IMO. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Are guards' DPs worth the muni?24 May 2015, 01:50 AM Jump back to quoted post23 May 2015, 23:49 PMCookiezNcreem Unless the OverLord all knowing Strategist Sarantini told you it wasn't then im pretty sure received accuracy is squad-type specific. I(and others)would be brutally killing original MG crews to get rid of the penalty all day if it wasnt. MG penalties will persist, but model stats will persist. That is why you can have support weapons with extra vision (PIo/Pathfinders) or camo (OH). To clarify, a vet3 conscript won't retain it's veterancy buffs because those are squad specific but anything from the unit itself will ("Me thinks" RA, armor, DPS, reinforce cost). In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: No tech demo just poor design.23 May 2015, 23:40 PM The point is, how good would it be for Axis to have demos, when they have a lot of useful munition sinks in comparison to Soviets. We don't see as much demos with USF since they do have munition sinks and it's commander locked. If you want Paratroopers demos, sure have it, and know that the use is so niche that no ones use it. Give OH demos, and give SU the ability to make bunkers which can heal, reinforce and supress. Hey, you would have demos to destroy them... I'll say, make demos been able to be seen, so you need to use some clever use of LoS and location to make use of it (and not just in the middle of the road). In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Are guards' DPs worth the muni?23 May 2015, 23:31 PM Jump back to quoted post23 May 2015, 21:44 PMCookiezNcreem I'm pretty sure received accuracy is squad specific. Hey, you are the Senior strategist here. You should be sure and showing up stats and shit In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: No tech demo just poor design.23 May 2015, 18:19 PM Jump back to quoted post23 May 2015, 18:17 PMKurtWilde Moi, trolling? nein The troll post/account just got banhammered. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: No tech demo just poor design.23 May 2015, 18:10 PM Lol wut. Eventhough low quality, i admire the effort put into it this troll acount. ༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つGibe Ketetof artist tag༼ つ ◕_◕ ༽つ In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Are guards' DPs worth the muni?23 May 2015, 18:08 PM Jump back to quoted post23 May 2015, 16:36 PMcomputerheat wut? Conscript "Added a received accuracy modifier of 1.087" Although you should still do it, specially since in general i'll rather have a conscript sitting in base reinforcing rather than a Guard. In: COH2 Gameplay