Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: Fuel or Ammo first?21 Jun 2021, 17:34 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Jun 2021, 12:28 PMafrrs all 3 are important , this poll is irrelevant Nah. VPs are not that important as an opening move. VPs are a resource that you only need 1 to win a game. Fuel/Ammo will give you eventually the VPs. This doesn't work the other way round. Answering OP: It depends on what you are gonna use your resources first. If you are planning on rushing a vehicle you might want to rush fuel first. On the other hand, if you want a performance boost through weapon upgrade or surprise someone with some mine/grenade, you might want munitions. Say, you are playing Soviets, you might want first munition as you are generally more limited by mp in order to tech. Therefore you might want to be more cost effective as early as you can with your CE flamer. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Hi Maybe someone can help me 20 Jun 2021, 19:35 PM New patch has rolled out. Therefore its highly unlikely someone can watch it. In: Lobby
Thread: sandbag behind flag is awful mechanic.20 Jun 2021, 19:28 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Jun 2021, 16:22 PMGachiGasm I was proposing back in the day, that sandbags just should take damage from small arms. Game already has such mechanic. For example, UKF mortar pit is giving you cover if you stand behind it. You will have full benifit of green cover, but the mortar pit itself will be taking damage from enemy shooting at your inf and hitting mortar pit in process. This would be a perfect solution imo. With it sandbags will be degrading over time after each engagement and you would have to either repair them or later on rebuild them since they will be eventually destoyed. The only thing that should be done - make them non-targetable by inf without flames\AT weapons, to prevent players focus fire them with blobs. And speaking of sandbags behind points. I belive size of non-buildable area around the flag could be easily increased, this will at least alow enemy to use your sandbags, with enouth given space. Aren't most non MGs small arm fire only visuals? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Urban Assault Doc feedback (USA)20 Jun 2021, 19:15 PM Jump back to quoted post19 Jun 2021, 15:58 PMPip I'm still of the opinion that the zero-micro, pinpoint-accurate rifle grenades on REs are not a particularly good bit of design. I was a little disappointed that they reverted the change that made them manually activated, at the very least. Me 2 Jump back to quoted post19 Jun 2021, 18:35 PMKatitof Standing at half range to RETs to hardcounter the upgrade is not enough? That's not the point. If the ability needs buffs after making it manual do so. Some might argue that it is similar to a flamethrower. But it would be more akin to having the flamethrower do little to no dmg and it leaving a 5s duration flame every 15s that needs to be moved around. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Rework in MG deployment16 Jun 2021, 16:32 PM Are you selecting the MG and right clicking or using the "get out of garrison" button ? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Winrates indicate horrible balance14 Jun 2021, 21:40 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Jun 2021, 19:18 PMTanithScout MG42 cannot be underestimated. I'd love to see the stats of 3v3/4v4 with only OKW as the Axis. You can, just scroll down a bit. You only have information for May as that was a feature which was added recently. 4xOKW = 54% (2099) 4xOH = 46% (1583) Both are the least popular combination. Most popular combination is 2xOKW/2xOH with a 62% (19330). Against the most common match up from allies it sits at 57% (BSSU) BSSU sits at 51% (9449), been the only one positive combination. Followed closely at 49% by BBSU and BSUU (5349/5371) and SSSU (3632) at 48% In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Winrates indicate horrible balance13 Jun 2021, 20:56 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Jun 2021, 20:32 PMblvckdream Ahh...so I use all all games then people complain Allies players are simply noobs and don't know how to play and if I choose Top 200 the sample size is too small. I guess that proves the game is totally balanced then. How could I ever doubt the balance team? Top200 for 3v3 and 4v4 is useless cause it just shows how not even 1% of the games are balanced match making wise. All stats for 3v3/4v4 works in the context that it's the only useful sample we have. And the counterargument they gave you of "noob" allies doesn't work because there are both noobs on Allies and Axis and in the past we already have stats that made Allies have better WR. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: KT is trash 11 Jun 2021, 19:46 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Jun 2021, 18:15 PMLady Xenarra Casual? Well we did have a recent (with money) 3v3 tournament featuring many of the regulars here. Members of the balance team also play 3v3 regularly at the top ranks too. I wouldn't say those ppl at the top 100 play casually, they take their games extremely seriously including yours truly. 4v4 is just a clusterfuck though and probably closer to what you were thinking yes. The problem is not the game mode per se, but the matchmaking. The coh2stats shows it clearly by how there are not enough players to make games "fair". In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update 2021 Live Now10 Jun 2021, 23:08 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Jun 2021, 22:04 PMLewka While Blizzard Activision is a sole company, the studios that they own are kinda isolated from each other. They do their own thing. So even when it was bought back in 2000 something, Blizzard kept doing it's own thing because the OG devs and founders of the company were still there. Fast forward 15 years and you could see how the company kept bleeding talents and they either retired or left. And we are not talking about entry positions. 10 years ago you could be hyped by whatever Blizzard was doing. 5 years ago you had HOPE that Blizzard kept whatever ember it still had going on. Nowadays you should just treat it like any other company out there. You know what they say. Fool me once, shame on you, fool me twice, shame on me. In: Lobby
Thread: Commander Update 2021 Live Now10 Jun 2021, 17:57 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Jun 2021, 22:32 PMLewka Curious. Are you paying attention to World of Warcraft at all? They are very behind schedule in releasing their first content patch for Shadowlands, it's been almost 8 months since the expansion released and still no new content to the game, the wait is just awful... Way more behind schedule than CoH2 is that's for sure, if CoH2 even is behind schedule. I mean, it doesn't really feel like it is Never played WoW. I just know that for quite some time Blizzard has been screwing up their title flagships left and right. Specially those who have been given the "classic" treatment in terms of people assigned to them. In: Lobby