Profile of elchino7

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2

General Information
Steam: 76561198076231535


Thread: The most disappointing tank is the tiger9 Apr 2021, 18:17 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Apr 2021, 15:34 PMPip Not certain why you consider disagreement some sort of mortal sin. People fear having their point of views challenged. If i want one thing out of any "rework" or new balance pass on heavies, is to remove the extended range at vet2 and give them strengths/buffs in other areas as needed. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why no more non-linear teching9 Apr 2021, 18:09 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Apr 2021, 14:51 PMZeroZeroNi Why has all non linear teching been removed. Ost and Sov now essentially have linear tech. All the risk of USF non-linear teching has been removed. Only OKW and Brit has somewhat of non-liner teching but for the british it's just essentially the same thing as doctrine choice. WHy???? Because people didn't like facing: -Maxim spam, precision strike mortars and pre nerf Zis gun barrages -Double man snipers, clowncars and post rework Penals. -Pre nerf T70, M5 Quad of doom and Su76 spam. OH and UKF has always been linear tech with sprinkle options on late tech. OKW and USF (more so, compared to last BHQ rework) remains to be non linear teching though the ideal tools are accessible. When you limit options, the options you have available need to be strong enough to carry you while having less tools than your opponent. People don't like facing spam of single units or cheesy ones. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Renforce button need to change9 Apr 2021, 17:58 PM TBH i think for a future installment of the franchise, a right click on reinforce button to autocast it would be fine. In: Lobby
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - OKW Feedback8 Apr 2021, 15:10 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Apr 2021, 23:16 PMjagd wölfe This data is wrong and outdated by at least 1 patch Did those weapon profiles got changed? Then they are still valid. It SHOULD be updated up to 8/1/21 In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The current state of infantry - DPS and Utility7 Apr 2021, 19:01 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Apr 2021, 18:42 PMPip True, but "in a building" vs "behind a wall" is much more readable and intuitive than "In a crater" vs "In a crater, but it's one the mapmaker placed", y'know? Doesn't "building" cover have a slightly different icon to "green" cover anyway, though? Sure, that'd probably be enough, if it's actually possible to edit these sorts of UI elements. If we're going down that route I'd suggest the yellow shield, but with it being bisected diagonally, be used for "no suppression resistance" yellow cover. Having a gap in it would be a reasonable indicator that it's "worse" than regular yellow cover. It would probably be cleaner to just have a different colour though. That's even WORSE, it's not recognisable as cover at all if it's using the "no cover" ui elements! Probably a good idea, if this is within the scope of the Balance Team. It might be nice to do something sort of similar for player-built green cover too (if Mainlines keep their sandbags), as this would make map cover preferable to player-built cover. Would going from 45 range to 48 range really make all that much of a difference? Whatever i suggest is more in the realms of COH3. The only thing i see possible for COH2 is cutting down suppression recover and suppression modifier from 0.5 to 0.75 Anything from adding, modifying UI or using more type of cover i don't think it's gonna happen. I still don't think it's confusing that light cover with and without suppression modifiers would be an issue because generally light cover is not good enough to play around when suppression is involved but enough to make frontal push good against MGs. In case you are curious, the game has a lot of type of covers which are unused. I think all weapons have their profiles made to use them. They are: Open, Ice, Water, Mud, Team weapon heavy, DefCover narrow, Snow, Deep Snow, DefCover, Smoke, Bunker, Haltftrack Garrison (?), Emplacement and Trench. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: The current state of infantry - DPS and Utility7 Apr 2021, 18:23 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Apr 2021, 17:10 PMPip Doing that has the problem of not being intuitive/readable, you'd potentially have two sets of cover that are displayed identically in-game, but with different effects for no discernable reason. If it were possible to simply add a new UI element so we had; Red, Yellow, Green, Building, and a new, say, "Blue" cover, then this'd be fine. Mapper-placed cover could be Yellow, and player created "yellow" cover could then be "blue", identical to regular yellow cover apart from the lack of suppression resistance. I don't think it should be an issue to display as yellow. Right now we have green for both heavy cover and garrison cover which are different modifiers. Ideally i would say give a small green border for yellow light cover to signify that it provides some sort of suppression resistance. Alternative just give it the grey colour. I still think light cover created by any explosive is too strong for how "passive" it is available. It's 0.50 RA and 0.50 suppression modifier AND 2.5 suppression recovery rate. While at first i thought of simple removing any cover properties, i thought it would kill any viability of camouflage units late game. I think a more "neutral" cover should be added with 0.75 RA, 1.00 suppression modifier and 1.5 suppression recovery would been better. Leaving light cover generation to either big ordnances (offmap, Avre/ST, Howitzers). In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: The current state of infantry - DPS and Utility7 Apr 2021, 17:01 PM The solution should be that map created yellow cover should provide suppression resistance but player generated ones should not. At most it should be limited to heavy offmap artillery. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Map veto's appear to not be working7 Apr 2021, 16:23 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Apr 2021, 12:02 PMGiaA Just gonna go out on a limb and say this is false. Hasn't happened to me once. Consider how many vetoes you have and how many players there are. IIRC the rate is 15 maps = 5 vetoes. It's highly unlikely that an arranged team facing 2 randoms suddenly vetoes all maps. 4 randoms can make it possible but it's still extremely rare due to overlap of vetoes. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: The current state of infantry - DPS and Utility7 Apr 2021, 16:16 PM Low DPS means cover doesn't matter at all. As transitioning from one range to another goes unpunished. Now you just favoured CQC units as they can't be punished by long range DPS units. That's how the game looked like at release. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Map veto's appear to not be working7 Apr 2021, 00:00 AM Jump back to quoted post6 Apr 2021, 23:07 PMKisiel If I remember right, veto makes the map less likely to be picked, but it is still possible it will be Yep specially if it's 2v2 and higher. More so if you are playing random. In: COH2 Bugs