Profile of pigsoup

Jump back to quoted post30 Apr 2014, 21:00 PMTri86

in that case you need to work on your reading comprehension. it's hard at first but keep at it you'll get there. trust me it'll pay off when you can actually understand what people are posting.

i guess you're having a hard time understanding that mostly everything's been resolved. i think it's people like you who don't get it that continue to post. all i do is respond or disagree.

Jump back to quoted post30 Apr 2014, 11:31 AMTri86

oh i understood that perfectly and explained why that doesn't matter. most of the time an at gun will get one shot off before either unit moves out of range. that's just my experience though. what point did i miss now?

that 40fu difference comes at the cost of better survivability and better AT capabilities. it's what i prefer. i'd rather have other units dealing with infantry.

other than my first post i never said there was anything wrong with it, i said i don't like its new role and i prefer the previous TD version. i've said it many times throughout the thread.

Jump back to quoted post29 Apr 2014, 13:21 PMMorgolKing

I think the Soviet AT buff and changes to blitz were adequate. Even with the Panther buff to penetration, it will still be underperforming.

The issue is survivability. Why buy a unit that expensive, which because of its cost will always come out when the Soviet player has a couple tanks and an AT. Even if it can penetrate more, it will die very quickly and there goes all your fuel investment.

Jump back to quoted post28 Apr 2014, 19:42 PMTristan44

German smines don't wipe squads after one explosion. You have a chance to retreat.