Profile of pigsoup

Jump back to quoted post23 Aug 2015, 22:11 PMmiragefla

None of these truly help the USF major issues, it would end up being just a crutch, similar to a few patches ago where Ostheer had to just sit and hold and wait for Tigers and Stug Es and hope it would do something when they had all these other issues. And in smaller games the Pershing won't have that many units to support as that's where all the fuel would be going and it'd come late like the other heavy tanks where you'd have either multiple mediums trying to roll over your army unless you invested in your own vehicles that would delay a possible call-in further.

And as I said, Pershing won't be game-changing given that Axis can already deal with IS-2s with their own arsenal of things such as Jagdpanzers, Stugs, multiple ATGs, and their AT in general.

...

Jump back to quoted post18 Aug 2015, 17:40 PMBasilone

...
2) There have been several videos from some of the best fps players like Levelcapgaming, Jackfrags, and one of the best analytical cod players Ozerec that discuss how they disliked the faster ttk in certain games because it discouraged more player movement. Tychocelchuu (literally one of the first to start shoutcasting coh a long long time ago) has also talked about it related specifically to coh in his vids before, and everything he says is in alignment with what the highly competitive players want, he's never subjectively bitching about personal l2p problems. Now I've given two coh specific sources, in addition to the competitive gaming community at large backing more survivability to facilitate more movement. Couldn't give less of a shit if you find some top 50 ladder player that disagrees.