Profile of Aradan

Jump back to quoted post23 Mar 2020, 12:11 PMachpawel

I can only add it has been a glaring problem for years. It is far more effective than other units as it is basically a unit that deletes its counters (just like many other soviet units such as ZiS being able to barrage infantry and support weapons). You can outmaneuver it being a better player and hopefully not get snared or just ouranged. But you simply have to be significantly better to win, especially as ostheer. It is bittersweet to read about how powerful brumbar, panther or tiger or elephant are and, at the same time, the same people don't see anything wrong with things like, ISU, which is a combination of elephant and brumbar with insane range. The same people keep repeatning that it is the axis that have lategame armour advantage, etc. but fail to understand what tournament results show. The level of twisted logics here is just incredible. But I can understand that it was the allies who won the war and that asymetrical balance means that certain factions should be simply better. Why not admit it just openly? ISU has to be better and more cost effective than other units simply because Soviets won the war. It has to outrange all units and fight against factions without proper tank destroyers. It has to be supported by infantry with satchels because regular snares wouldn't be enough. Period.

Jump back to quoted post23 Mar 2020, 11:00 AMAlphrum

didn't know jadpanzer had high pen my bad

Jump back to quoted post19 Mar 2020, 14:08 PMWiderstreit

Now have so many spotting options for soviets fraction, non-doc cancer = nobrainer. Fan-boy move.

Can community stop fighing from fraction positions? Simply make them balanced, without any fan-boy shit?