Cruzz, I have no idea of your standard of "decent" then, but anyway, that was those Focus guys we beaten to bump our rank from 20 into 3 if I remember correctly, they did somehow well in the early game but their build and strategy was a total failure. The other so called top 40 scrub teams were a joke.
Also assume CELO working properly, they were rank 1, unless that software is flawed.
Sorry to burst your bubble, but it's the other way around.
If you play a bunch of games in a short period of time you're basically guaranteed to get a high rank unless you get insanely low ranked randoms opponents every single time. We got #6 as axis in 11 games without facing anyone over rank 50 (The rank 47 game was in the 3vs3 ladder). That's the level of competition on the ladder in team games.
If it is your case, with respect, I wouldn't challenge you, like what that childish Disney Kiddo do. Facts are facts. But in our case, we did beat 7-8 top 50 teams there, I don't really think they were actually good.
There is recent match history at the ladder, just in case of that aggressive kiddo keep accusing me lying.
You don't really need a lot of games in these modes.
If you're experienced in 2s and are top 100-200 there, you probably will be able to pull top 50 effortlessly in 4s with AT and will have to put little effort to get top 20 or better there.
These modes are and will not be competitive, all you need to do to never meet any challenging opponent is to play off prime time.
Indeed they are NOT competitive, balance does not exist there.
We did 2v2 up to top 20 once, it is just easy as ABC in 3v3.
And yes you can get rank 1 without facing anyone good in teamgames because the matchmaking doesn't work well in these large game sizes, people don't play AT that much so the ELO differences aren't too high and the game rewards stomping people who never have a chance against you way too much in terms of ELO.
If you grind a lot, it may be possible, but if you achieve this in a short period of time and so little amount of games, you require to beat "good" teams.
However, some of them are just good on the numbers, not their skills.
Do you understand any team of players with 1,000 hours or more and or top 200 skill could probably go 20-0 in team games with allies or axis simply because you will almost always play vs randoms that cant tell their shoe from their dick and not the other top AT's? When did i call anyone a noob? Can you read?
???????
Like when i asked for the calliope to be nerfed like a week ago? Like when i said "give ostheer panzer 3 to counter allied vehicles" about 3 times this past week. dafuq?
when I said "axis was ezmode" i was clearly referring to pre brit release in 4v4s.......which only a donkey would disagree with that.
again, can you read? Are you stupid?
0/10 shitposts m8.
I agree, that's why I don't really like these modes.
Although that's generally accurate, it's also false. It's not like any of those things cant be beaten, axis lacks no tools to defeat anything you mentioned.
Never claimed as can't be beaten, to beat it really takes a hell lot of good coordination well, comparing those to 3 OneClickWonders and Win, is plainly stupid.
Some sort of Focus guys, there are recent match history, genius. Not worth to save at all because they played really bad at that game. They spammed like 6 mortars, 2 ISGs and 2 mortars HT, not really achieved anything but got wiped completely to my T70s.
*If you are playing full "abusive" mode. Maxim spam with Rifle n IS support, M20/M5 with mortar pit/sniper support, followed by Aec/T70/Stuart support, medium spam (Cromwells/Sherman) to top it with CalliOP/Artillery cover.
0
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
