Profile of Thunderhun

Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2014, 17:50 PMsluzbenik

I like the new assymetrical balance of long-range grens vs cons and penals.

The problem is grens are too effective at long range. So my brief list:

1) Slightly nerf long-range gren damage so cons have a chance OR increase default Molotov range. Can't do both, or Sov will be totally OP again.
3) Increase M3 long-range DPS and nerf the close range if you want. I really have been trying to use it at range. IT DOES NOT WORK, like that guy's video shows it does no damage at max range and any closer, it gets eaten alive by pios or faust.

After that we can look at LMG and G43 efficiency once vetted. I don't think they are a big deal unvetted, but vet 2 is atrocious.

Jump back to quoted post30 Mar 2014, 04:14 AMVonIvan

You bet!


But anyway back to the more important issues at hand:
1. Cons Need to be even with Grens
2. CEs Need to be as effective as Pios
3. M3s should have a slight armor increase for their cost
4. LMGs and G43s Need to be nerfed, while SVT's(far range), PPsHs(mid range), and regular rifles(close/somewhat mid range) need a slight DPS buff to even out the playing field at the very least so they're as effective as what I put in the () part!
5. The more evening out of the factions, the better. All I care about is balance, and if you're playing Soviets in 2v2 or up, you've already put a nail in the coffin!

On a side note:
-FFS give Penals some sort of AT weapon so they're at least usable.
And for anyone who says I'm a Sovjet fanboi go play a 2v2 as the Soviets against someone who has a similar skill level to your team, and then come back and re-read this post.