Profile of Sturmpanther

Avatar Area

Offline Germany
Posts: 5441 | Subs: 36

General Information
Register Time: 17 Jun 2013, 15:24 PM
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/soe_sturmpanther
Steam: 76561198046481660
Residence:

Germany
Nationality:

Germany
Timezone: Europe/Berlin
Game Name: SoE-Sturmpanther

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Westwall26 Jun 2018, 15:29 PM On other maps the cutoffs are even more strong! On westwall you don't lose your muni and fuel with 1 single cutoff. But yes i like many called changes. I hope after LordRommel is ready to work back(atm ill) he probably will show up here. Changes: - Remove some redcover from the bases - Remove alot of dragonteeth, I mean this, the tank traps - Bunker north still not in playable area, and the Interactivity Stage Editor has holes in it in the south that eat the camera. - Open for the muni 1 more flank in the wood/hedges - Reduce the elevations around the middle map. - Increase the HP from the both Vp houses to 20-25% health, so not a single riflende kills it. - Maybe remove the houses on the cutoff, but replace it with green cover?( or another good solution) I disagree to swich the houses to the fuel points. I don't like to have a house direct at your fuel tbh. --> Yellow In: Summer patch 2018
Thread: Langreskaya26 Jun 2018, 15:18 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2018, 15:09 PMRosbone I did not. This was an exercise for me. I learn by doing. Everyone wrote this map off but I know a couple hours and it could be highly playable. Last time I talked to Tric about this map the point layout was the main issue. Having two VPs next to each other is a bad idea(Angoville). And moving the VPs means ALL of the other points need to be changed. So that is the first thing I did was move ALL of the points. I think Angoville needs a point layout change as well and saw this as an opportunity to try it out and maybe learn something. 1. Vehicle speed boost. 2. Insta-pinning of squads. 3. Creating impassable lines to slow approaching enemies. It seems like in 1v1 maps you would only want red cover in a few places: 1. Either straight from base to base to kill/chase down retreating enemies.(RED) 2. Or across the center of the map(YELLOW) ie Crossing in the Woods. 3. Or just some random areas to punish movement thru them. Langreskaya has RED cover all around your base exits. Seems bad. And it just feels wrong to make some of the road red cover and some not. Then it becomes ambiguous and works opposite of the deep snow mechanic. As all of my posts, 75% I speak from experience and what I see everyday. 25% is to either raise awareness for other readers or to ask questions I do not know the answers too. Maybe you should ask him. His video was helpful! I agree to remove red cover infront of a base, but like around the middle VP it should stay. 1. Faster attack possible for tanks 2. Risky attack for inf, but if you get in a good position the enemy has this problem to reach middle vp. 3. People should always be know where to stand. And not hey i stand afk on a road and idc ... and all your other called points ofc Because you talked short about angovill: Don't change the vps on angovill! we can talk more about angovill in the angovill thread. In: Summer patch 2018
Thread: Port of Hamburg26 Jun 2018, 15:13 PM I agree to some of the changes. But to not all. Have to think more about it. But it is def. on my list/ plan. --> yellow. In: Summer patch 2018
Thread: CoH2 going Free to Play? Or new content dropping soon?26 Jun 2018, 14:44 PM LUL that thread xddd In: Lobby
Thread: Return of Relic Pro/Am and there will be a new update!26 Jun 2018, 09:27 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2018, 09:24 AMTatatala Another smurf account revealed. In: Lobby
Thread: Langreskaya26 Jun 2018, 09:26 AM Jump back to quoted post25 Jun 2018, 21:59 PMDiogenes5 I am level 16 across all factions so yes, Langres and Angloville are simply both horrible with the way mechanics work in COH2. They should be removed from the map pool. 1. I can / could not know it, because you have no steamid or playercard here. Sorry. 2. Langres and Angovill will stay in coh2. No matter what! (From relic) And i could imagine, in the case coh3 will come whenever, there will be maps from coh1 and coh2 too. But yes i agree both maps have to get reworked. In: Summer patch 2018
Thread: Langreskaya26 Jun 2018, 09:23 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2018, 05:06 AMRosbone As an exercise and because I have years of modifying map experience: RosboneSkaya Completely relaid out with a long list of changes. I have a feeling it will play closer to Kholodny Ferma now? More Yin/Yang with skirmishes over center cutoffs. - Moved VPs to normal locations. - Moved buildings slightly. - Added sight blockers around buildings to limit their effectiveness and allow flanking. My thought was an MG should suppress you once. You retreat. You return and flank/grenade/mortar. So the buildings still have decent vision of the map, but do not have vision at their closest base. - Moved a shed to the north side of map to mirror south. - Removed base GREEN cover. - Removed all RED cover. - Increased south base size. - Fixed base rotations for USF. - Optimized tile chunks, some exceeded 8 tiles/chunk. Changed to 4 or 5 with no visible quality change. - Flattened the major hills/elevations a lot. - Many points have sight blockers located so you can approach and take the point without being seen by buildings. As stated above, I like to make MGs in garrisons useful but not OP. I also like the idea of limiting them a lot if close to a base. Here is an example of how I tried to implement that: RED lines are sight blockers to allow approach to the garrison. GREEN lines are green cover. BLUE lines show approach paths for the blue MG garrison. PINK lines show approach paths for the pink MG garrison. Other options are putting sight blockers right on the building or using buildings with no windows. Both of those have their place, but just feel wrong to me in some instances. Like I said, the MG should suppress you once then move out of the garrison because it will get flanked/grenaded/mortared the next time. Thoughts? Did you had a talk about this map with tric? He could give you a videolink for this map. And i did not saw the map ingame yet, but removing the WHOLE redcover i disagree! For base yes ok, but whole? There is a reason, why red cover is in coh. And yes usa had problems from the base, thats why i had in worst case a solution to use sightblockers in their base xD. But maybe your change works too. In: Summer patch 2018
Thread: Return of Relic Pro/Am and there will be a new update!26 Jun 2018, 09:17 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2018, 09:11 AMsiddolio ehem I guess you are vonasten? In: Lobby
Thread: Map veto stats26 Jun 2018, 09:14 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2018, 06:18 AMLuciano I agree with Latch in this one, Counter Strike GO, one of the most competitive games on Earth, lets you play on the maps you want. I think this system is kinda agressive to the playerbase, it obligates you to do something that you dont want. This is automatch tho. Sadly we cant do nothing because vetoes are attached to coding I disagree here. And i agree with Rosbone. Its always funny when some global elite player from "only office" played on dust 2 or Mirage. They were just useless noobs You want to be one of the best coh2 players? That means you have skills --> Skill is mirco AND Mapknowledge! And that you as person can adapt to new patch and new maps. You want to play only on 1 single map --> Go and create customgame and hope that you find other same people. This remembers me of coh1 lobby system: Always schelde or hochwaldbresche... But being lv 20 oO In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Map veto stats26 Jun 2018, 09:11 AM Jump back to quoted post26 Jun 2018, 08:03 AMSiphon X. You mean this one? thank you. In: COH2 Gameplay