Profile of rezzzzen

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 76

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/rezzzzen


Thread: Day 1 Issue's with COH2 that still aren't fixed23 Feb 2014, 18:54 PM eastern front mod for coh2, seriously ? In: Lobby
Thread: The elephant(s) in the room16 Feb 2014, 21:23 PM Because of the issues I'm writing about in this post, I went ahead and actually cancelled my purchase of Company of Heroes 2. I regard the current situation as no less than hopeless. So how exactly did you get to a conclusion that current situation is hopeless when you dont own the game? you played at free weekend? i just want to know where did you get all your knowledge... thank you for your response also this In: Lobby
Thread: AmiPolizeiFunk9 Feb 2014, 12:57 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Feb 2014, 12:15 PMMilkaCow There is nothing wrong with voicing ones opinion, but in this case the who, when and where/how was a problem. First of all there are quite some people who actually like CoH2, amongst them quite some vCoH players so you can't say that 'all' vCoH players hated it. People had different expectations - some wanted a re-skinned vCoH with better graphics located on the eastern front, others wanted a similar game. CoH2 shares a lot of similarities with vCoH, but some essential ones (popcap, resources, commanders) are different, meaning it actually plays different. Second Ami just ran SNF5, the biggest CoH2 tournament which was supported by Relic. Additionally Relic is long known to post quite a bit on this page and have a good relation to CoH2.org - which is also run by Ami, putting him in a position pretty close to Relic. Lastly he continuously praised the game during the casts. Third is that the opinion was voiced on a stream, which was highlighted and in a way that makes it look even worse than the actual content (in my opinion). Combining this, a person with a high profile in CoH2, who runs a site with a rather okay user count, who said he 'supports' the game and loves the CoH-franchise publicly bashes the game. Do you really wonder why this makes people that actually like CoH2 angry and annoyed? Or why this is causing such a fall out? Hell yea, it's getting blown out of proportion, but as a person who got a lot of publicity Ami should've known what it would cause. To anyone who did not know this all along (I mean, his lack of knowledge about CoH2 was visible during the casts already showing quite disinterest) it just looks wierd - this self-declared supporter actually hates the game. I guess it would be best to move along and let the topic die. In general, let the whole 'vCoH pros hate CoH2' die. If you say you dislike the game once and give reasons then it's constructive criticism. If you say it twice - well okay, you wanna be thorough. If you say it 30-40 times then it's not constructive criticism anymore, it's trying to ruin the game for others as well and it gets quite effing annoying. If you don't like CoH2 okay, go play something else and leave the people that play and like CoH2 alone. Now if you run a CoH2 fan page and don't like CoH2 it's a bit harder to just move on. Doing nothing will only make the situation worse, closing down the page would be a huge middle finger to anyone who helped build the site and has an interest in it's continuation. So what other possibilities are there? Change the people who run CoH2.org - so maybe Ami should do that and try to negotiate a deal with a group of persons that actually like the game (and page) and want to keep it running. +1 i completely agree with what you said especially this part Jump back to quoted post9 Feb 2014, 12:15 PMMilkaCow There is nothing wrong with voicing ones opinion, but in this case the who, when and where/how was a problem. In: Fan Clubs
Thread: Pio/CE Flamethrower upgrade29 Dec 2013, 16:17 PM Straight to my point. I really dislike idea of getting flamethrowers for pios/CE and after first fight they explode when fuel tank (5%chance) gets hit. Maybe its not big percentage but it makes flame upgrades somehow pointless when you know this can happen. Secondly it involves no skill just pure RNG. On the other hand i like these little things happening to your troops but it should somehow involve your opponent at least trying little bit harder to get rid off that flame squad. So here is what i propose: 0% chance from small arms fire - involved no skill just pray to RNG gods 5% chance from mortar fire (this is basically how it works now and a lot of things about mortars is RNG so dont change this(of course discuss)) - i would probably go for 0% also 25-50% (discuss the percentage) chance from mines. - counter, playing as soviets 25-50% (discuss the percentage) chance from a rifle nade IF squad is suppressed or pinned. - counter, playing as germans Its almost same amount of munition (yes i know Rnades are unlocked at BP2 but if you think about it that u can also use mines as germans (those 80muni AI mines) to counter those CEs its in my eyes ok) so i think it MIGHT be balanced this way. of course feel free to discuss. Also it will make you buy wirecutters/minedetectors a lot more to prevent your flame pios getting "mined". So there is more space for 2pios opening etc. This will eliminate the total randomness of small arms fire to almost instagib your squad with 60munitions with it. Provides a counter for 60 muni upgrade in a 30 muni mine which may or may not (this is why i want bigger percentage(closer to 50% or even more) on mine detonation to make it somehow reliable) destroy the flamethrower which a lot of times kill at least 1-2 more models + mine detonation can be really harmful. Provides a counter for 35 muni(correct me if wrong) as a rifle nade BUT Combat Engineers squad MUST be pinned or suppressed to avoid being it even more easy to kill those poor CE. I know it might be little bit complicated, being it just one upgrade but i really think that spending that 60 muni will ALWAYS be better somewhere else and this is a problem which i am trying to mitigate. thank you for reading be polite In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: So, I missed the whole "why russians hate coh2" thing...30 Nov 2013, 11:37 AM SINGLE PLAYER SPOILER ALERT In: Lobby
Thread: Commander Overlap a serious problem22 Nov 2013, 00:10 AM 0-(-1) In: Lobby
Thread: Here's your f-ing Tiger Relic (replay)19 Nov 2013, 23:17 PM What about removing one ability from this commander, giving him normal tiger at 6cp(or whatever normal tiger is) and at 8-9 CP u can upgrade for free but stopping ur income. You still need to save up for tiger a lot of resources. u can use tiger and later in the game vet up or you can play without ever going for that option if u think stopping income now will be too drastic. This doctrine is all about giving vet to units so it fits in the purpose of the commander quite well. What do you think? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: GG, not.3 Nov 2013, 11:18 AM Once I said GG when i was getting baseraped at 25-30min mark, I didnt quit but try to push him back. It was more than one hour long battle and in the end I emerged victorious. Never give up !!! In: Lobby
Thread: New Commanders / Units discussion 23 Sep 2013, 23:18 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Sep 2013, 23:11 PMRubbers 120 mp for an infantry unit? Idc how fucking weak they are, thats OP as shit.... I mean thats super easily spammable and cheaper than conscripts or engineers and give way too much capping power... Also, if they are anything like the Ostruppen units in game already, for 120 mp, this will be overpowered. they said that they are weaker that actual osttruppen in the game, but when they are in cover their stats are buffed, and when they move they cant shoot In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: New Commanders / Units discussion 23 Sep 2013, 22:14 PM from what i remembered : - Ostruppen unit (6 men squad) - 120MP - M-42 AT gun - "something around 200mp" so i guess 170-200 In: COH2 Gameplay