|
2 suggestions,
Bren LMG for Assault guards.
Convert Muni to Fuel ability for Lends Lease instead of Zis truck, you can't give this allies. I t only converts your own muni to fuel. |
That would make things so much worse its not even funny.
OG jeagers had 5 G43, it was 2nd most overpowered infantry squad ever concieved in this game right after old OKW Jeagers who outranged all other infantry, had enough sight to utilize it and had passive perma sprint, you could kite to death everything that wasn't vehicle with them, while with ost JLI you would just run up and kill on retreat everything, G43 shoot rapidly enough its irrelevant if they do 16 or 14, they'd have to do 12 or 10.
Buddy, Why do you not think through some of the things you say. So you are saying rifles are OP??? |
|
I say redesign the Jaeger command squad.
Lower their weapon damage to 14 and give them 5 g43's maybe with the same stats a rifle grands or something with better long range or what ever. Them being able 1 volley models is bull. |
Mp40 volks should be a non-doctrinal, global upgrade choice, like stgs you mean like coh1??? |
And on a small side note: Some weapons like HMGs and LMGs have increased penetration. Depending on your opponent, the Shock troop armor is worth less than calculated in a "standard" formula.
to be fair the only time this would really be a concern, if anyone was dumb enough to charge an mg head through it's arch head on. And if one suddenly find them self in front of an AI tank. In both cases Any amount of defense vs these is sort of pointless. |
That would be something. Reminds me of Wehr version of shock troops then but with sprint instead of body armour. Im guessing this would be OP though since they can be called in at the start of a match
There isn't too much difference between vet3 shocks and vet3 6 man ass grens.
Ass grens have around 10% lower dps and around 11% lower defenses (shocks have 66% to be dealt damage with 83% chance to be hit which is around 44.4% to avoid damage, while 6 man ass grens have 40% chance to avoid damage)
|
Thread: RK 43 4 May 2021, 15:42 PM
Someone mentioned raket is bad because it can hardly penetrate kv1/comet/churchil, but in reality raket has higher penetrate than 57.
(57: 150/140/130 vs raket: 200/190/180)
Thinking about it, OkW p4 or vet2 OST p4 has 234 armor which is only 6 less than churchil. Panther has 260 by default and goes up to 286. It can bounce almost half the shot even at the close range. So... You see what I mean. 57 isn't the best at least on the hand of allies. Whom need high pen to deal with high armor tanks. I'd rather use 6pounder on this matter.
But 57 has HVAP, with it it has 60 range + 225/210/195 pen + considerable higher fire rate. |
Thread: RK 43 4 May 2021, 15:35 PM
What do you mean? The stats are there for everyone to look up.
Well I mean he could have said, "I wish it had the same stats as M1". It's not as if the weapon can not m1 stats by not being m1. |
Thread: RK 43 4 May 2021, 14:30 PM
He said that because the Pak40 is an Axis unit and therefore could potentially be used for OKW.
I personally prefer the M1 ATG over any other AT-gun because of ROF, reaction time, cone of fire, insane range and ability to self spot at vet1 plus very very good penetration with HVAP. If you feed the M1 muni it is definitely the best ATG. It is also objectively the best ATG against any sort of light vehicle due to ROF and cone of fire even without muni. It also costs only 270 MP which makes it quite a bit easier to afford in the early game compared to regular AT-guns and the Raketenwerfer.
I mean you could always have the stats. |
Thread: RK 43 4 May 2021, 14:23 PM
Raketen is absolutely garbage. I would throw a party if OKW got the pak40.
Stupid question, why do people think pak 40 is best ATG?? I mean isn't USF m1 57mm better??? |
0
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
