Profile of ZeroZeroNi

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1563

General Information


Thread: Bunkers21 Jun 2021, 07:49 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Jun 2021, 05:55 AMShadowLinkX37 ??? I can't complain about things becasue I have a badge? Not if this the complaint is this petty. Neither of those things justifies why they cost zero pop, it's not a justification, it's an example of weird balancing logic. not to mention the video showing a LGB which should AT THE VERY LEAST deal a pixel of HP to an enclosed bunker with 1 man. Grenades are intended to clear garrisons such as this IRL. And bundle-nade IRL used blow off threads of tanks or derail trains they don't do that in game, I wonder if the 0 pop fighting position or the new 0 pop soviet bunker actually takes any decent damage from bundle-nade. Why not just give bren guns 90% moving DPS on sections since pfusi's get that on G43s. Alls fair right? Hey, so long as you give Grens the ability to upgrade 2 lmg 42's and a 5th since section get to do that then sure all fair as you said. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pershing vs Tiger. Shouldn't Pershing be buffed?21 Jun 2021, 05:45 AM Jump back to quoted post15 May 2021, 16:01 PMleithianz They cost pretty much the same (630mp + 230fuel vs 640mp + 230fuel), but tiger has been spotted many times in ML, and none(AFAIK) of the Pershing on field. And I believe there is a good reason to it. Pershing's stat is simply not worth it after the last nerf. 1) Armor & health Tiger: 1040 health + 300 armor Pershing: 960 health + 270 armor Even Panther & Brummbarr has same (or higher after vetted) armor than "HEAVY" tank that costs 230fuel. 2) gun Pershing has pen. of +20 on every range. And deals better in AI. But Tiger shoots faster. How fast? Combined with 1), Tiger vet.3 wins over Pershing vet.3 in any range. Even vet.0 Tiger has 50:50 on vet3 Pershing. 3) vet Pershing / Tiger vet1: acceleration + 30% / Blitzkrieg vet2: turret rotation + 20% + unlock grenade / range +5 + accuracy + 20% + turret rotation +30% vet3: accuracy + 20% + reload -30% / reload - 30% + rotation + 20% + max. speed + 20% + acceleration + 20% This TBH is just way in favor of Tiger. It gets range +5 while Pershing gets to throw grenade.... Really revamp needs to be done here in the Pershing's favor. Overall, Pershing is inferior in all ways except for the AI a little. As I've mentioned, Vet3 Pershing lose to the vet0 Tiger. I haven't seen Pershing commander in any mode recently. Any thoughts on this topic? No, Ostheer doesn't have 60 range TDs. OKW doesn't have 60 range ATGs. AEF has both. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bunkers21 Jun 2021, 05:39 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Jun 2021, 01:25 AMShadowLinkX37 I still don't understand why these are 0 popcap and apparently immune to light gammon bombs. Is there a reason axis bunkers need significantly more armor than the USF counterpart? Yeah why is it that a 17 lbr can't be de-crewed have to be destroyed and has brace that just about negates all damage and can be repaired while brace has the same damage, pen, range as pak43 is non-doc and has +40% more hp???? oh right pak 43 shoot through walls I guess since that justify's it you can accept not being able to throw nades justifies it's higher armor. I didn't expect such a petty and thoughtless complaint from a MOD, shame on you. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Stug E is still a terrible tank21 Jun 2021, 05:33 AM In a faction where you have Brums anything else is gonna feel like trash. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: PTRS Penals and Soviet vs Ostheer balance19 Jun 2021, 06:22 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Jun 2021, 22:24 PMblvckdream M3 and Penals is so easy to counter as Ostheer. Not sure what your problem is. Get MG42 LMG Grens and Pgrens and make sure you have a Pak once it's time for T70 and you should always win against equally skilled players. What's way harder to counter is 4 Cons + Zis into T70. You do realize he is talking from a 3v3+ perspective. It would be very easy to counter m3 as Ost if this was only 1v1. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: PTRS Penals and Soviet vs Ostheer balance19 Jun 2021, 06:20 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Jun 2021, 22:10 PMKatitof especially considering the fact that you have to severely delay ATG for that infantry. What are you high or have you never played the game. That is the most stupid statement that I'v heard from you. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The devs did it again... Buffed B4 into the heaven17 Jun 2021, 14:08 PM would it be so bad to turn the B4 into a pak43 clone with a vet1 single shot barrage ability that does 640 damage??? You know just food for thought. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Why will ppsh41 be removed from GRCA tactics??17 Jun 2021, 03:57 AM Title. I don't really understand this change. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Infantry combat8 Jun 2021, 12:45 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jun 2021, 23:00 PMGachiGasm Its actually funny how speaking of blobing ppl seem to forget that vCoH (with all it problems) managed to be much more punishing for ppl who blob. Staring from the fact that inderect fire like mortars gave suppresion, LMGs had suppresion, pintles had suppresion. In CoH2 its a) You have mass advantage b) You have just stronger inf. Have one of those and you can blob to no-end and it will effective. All this race to "no-bullshit-wipes" while was wellcomed to some degree, just benifited blobing. Sure, loosing one squad to a demo-charge is frustrating for sure, but loosing blob to a demo-charge is a bad play which teaches you that blobing is bad. Lowering lethality more or less fixed problem of RNG squad wipes but at the same time, nothing was brought to keep blobing less attractive to do. Well CoH2 is super risk free in every department. Capping has no risk, teching has no risk I don't think people would appreciate risks in coh2 at this late of a stage. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Infantry combat8 Jun 2021, 12:38 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jun 2021, 19:14 PMKatitof Does it need even more tho? Does that even make a difference in the slightest??? In: COH2 Balance